Evaluating ChatGPT ability to answer urinary tract Infection-Related questions

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infectious diseases now Pub Date : 2024-03-08 DOI:10.1016/j.idnow.2024.104884
Hakan Cakir , Ufuk Caglar , Sami Sekkeli , Esra Zerdali , Omer Sarilar , Oguzhan Yildiz , Faruk Ozgor
{"title":"Evaluating ChatGPT ability to answer urinary tract Infection-Related questions","authors":"Hakan Cakir ,&nbsp;Ufuk Caglar ,&nbsp;Sami Sekkeli ,&nbsp;Esra Zerdali ,&nbsp;Omer Sarilar ,&nbsp;Oguzhan Yildiz ,&nbsp;Faruk Ozgor","doi":"10.1016/j.idnow.2024.104884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>For the first time, the accuracy and proficiency of ChatGPT answers on urogenital tract infection (UTIs) were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study aimed to create two lists of questions: frequently asked questions (FAQs, public-based inquiries) on relevant topics, and questions based on guideline information (guideline-based inquiries). ChatGPT responses to FAQs and scientific questions were scored by two urologists and an infectious disease specialist. Quality and reliability of all ChatGPT answers were checked using the Global Quality Score (GQS). The reproducibility of ChatGPT answers was analyzed by asking each question twice.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All in all, 96.2 % of FAQs (75/78 inquiries) related to UTIs were correctly and adequately answered by ChatGPT, and scored GQS 5. None of the ChatGPT answers were classified as GQS 2 and GQS 1. Moreover, FAQs about cystitis, urethritis, and epididymo-orchitis were answered by ChatGPT with 100 % accuracy (GQS 5). ChatGPT answers for EAU urological infections guidelines showed that 61 (89.7 %), 5 (7.4 %), and 2 (2.9 %) ChatGPT responses were scored GQS 5, GQS 4, and GQS 3, respectively. None of the ChatGPT responses for EAU urological infections guidelines were categorized as GQS 2 and GQS 1. Comparison of mean GQS values of ChatGPT answers for FAQs and EAU urological guideline questions showed that ChatGPT was similarly able to respond to both question groups (p = 0.168). The ChatGPT response reproducibility rate was highest for the FAQ subgroups of cystitis, urethritis, and epididymo-orchitis (100 % for each subgroup).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The present study showed that ChatGPT gave accurate and satisfactory answers for both public-based inquiries, and EAU urological infection guideline-based questions. Reproducibility of ChatGPT answers exceeded 90% for both FAQs and scientific questions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13539,"journal":{"name":"Infectious diseases now","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666991924000393/pdfft?md5=c75d26b339be033e68ccd551c6111988&pid=1-s2.0-S2666991924000393-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious diseases now","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666991924000393","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

For the first time, the accuracy and proficiency of ChatGPT answers on urogenital tract infection (UTIs) were evaluated.

Methods

The study aimed to create two lists of questions: frequently asked questions (FAQs, public-based inquiries) on relevant topics, and questions based on guideline information (guideline-based inquiries). ChatGPT responses to FAQs and scientific questions were scored by two urologists and an infectious disease specialist. Quality and reliability of all ChatGPT answers were checked using the Global Quality Score (GQS). The reproducibility of ChatGPT answers was analyzed by asking each question twice.

Results

All in all, 96.2 % of FAQs (75/78 inquiries) related to UTIs were correctly and adequately answered by ChatGPT, and scored GQS 5. None of the ChatGPT answers were classified as GQS 2 and GQS 1. Moreover, FAQs about cystitis, urethritis, and epididymo-orchitis were answered by ChatGPT with 100 % accuracy (GQS 5). ChatGPT answers for EAU urological infections guidelines showed that 61 (89.7 %), 5 (7.4 %), and 2 (2.9 %) ChatGPT responses were scored GQS 5, GQS 4, and GQS 3, respectively. None of the ChatGPT responses for EAU urological infections guidelines were categorized as GQS 2 and GQS 1. Comparison of mean GQS values of ChatGPT answers for FAQs and EAU urological guideline questions showed that ChatGPT was similarly able to respond to both question groups (p = 0.168). The ChatGPT response reproducibility rate was highest for the FAQ subgroups of cystitis, urethritis, and epididymo-orchitis (100 % for each subgroup).

Conclusion

The present study showed that ChatGPT gave accurate and satisfactory answers for both public-based inquiries, and EAU urological infection guideline-based questions. Reproducibility of ChatGPT answers exceeded 90% for both FAQs and scientific questions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估 ChatGPT 回答尿路感染相关问题的能力。
简介:首次评估了 ChatGPT 有关泌尿生殖道感染(UTI)答案的准确性和熟练程度:该研究首次评估了有关泌尿生殖道感染(UTI)的 ChatGPT 答案的准确性和熟练程度:研究旨在创建两个问题列表:相关主题的常见问题(FAQ,基于公众的咨询)和基于指南信息的问题(基于指南的咨询)。由两名泌尿科医生和一名传染病专家对 ChatGPT 上的常见问题和科学问题的回复进行评分。所有 ChatGPT 答案的质量和可靠性均采用全球质量评分 (GQS) 进行检查。通过对每个问题提问两次来分析 ChatGPT 答案的再现性:总之,96.2% 的UTI 相关常见问题(75/78 个咨询)都得到了 ChatGPT 的正确和充分回答,并获得了 GQS 5 分。此外,ChatGPT 对有关膀胱炎、尿道炎和附睾睾丸炎的常见问题的回答准确率为 100%(GQS 5)。针对 EAU 泌尿系统感染指南的 ChatGPT 答案显示,61 个(89.7%)、5 个(7.4%)和 2 个(2.9%)ChatGPT 答案分别获得了 GQS 5、GQS 4 和 GQS 3 分。比较常见问题和 EAU 泌尿系统指南问题的 ChatGPT 答案的平均 GQS 值显示,ChatGPT 对两组问题的回答能力相似(p= 0.168)。膀胱炎、尿道炎和附睾睾丸炎常见问题亚组的 ChatGPT 回答重现率最高(各亚组均为 100%):本研究表明,ChatGPT 对基于公众的咨询和基于 EAU 泌尿系统感染指南的问题都给出了准确和令人满意的答案。对于常见问题和科学问题,ChatGPT 答案的再现性均超过 90%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infectious diseases now
Infectious diseases now Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
116
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
Outcomes of low-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole treatment in patients with non-HIV pneumocystis pneumonia: A nationwide Japanese retrospective cohort study. A case series of intermittent nucleoside analogue-based (NA) regimen to maintain HBV virological suppression in coinfected HBV/HIV patients with suppressed viremia. The resurgence of diphtheria in Zinder, Niger. The effects of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on the delivery of maternal and child health services in South Africa. Impact of [18F] FDG PET/CT on outcomes in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: A retrospective single-center experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1