The prevalence of gambling problems in prison populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Behavioral Addictions Pub Date : 2024-03-08 Print Date: 2024-03-26 DOI:10.1556/2006.2024.00005
Elise Victoria Tørdal, Ståle Pallesen, Dominic Sagoe, Lise Øen Jones, Farha Mahjabeen
{"title":"The prevalence of gambling problems in prison populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Elise Victoria Tørdal, Ståle Pallesen, Dominic Sagoe, Lise Øen Jones, Farha Mahjabeen","doi":"10.1556/2006.2024.00005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The overall prevalence of gambling problems across prison populations is currently unknown. The objective of the present study was therefore to quantitatively synthetize prevalence estimates of gambling problems in prison populations using a random effects meta-analytic model and to investigate if the estimates were moderated by time frame, cut-off levels, and sample size.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To be included the studies had to report original data on the prevalence of gambling problems in a prison sample and to be written in a European language, whereas data based on abstracts or qualitative reports were excluded. The search ended on December 1, 2023 and were conducted in Web of Science, PubMed, Cinahl, PsycINFO, Embase, Google Scholar, Grey Literature Report, and GreyNet. Risk of bias was assessed with a standardized 10-item measure for epidemiological studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 26 studies comprising 9,491 participants were included. The vast majority of the participants were males. The most commonly used instrument for assessment of gambling problems was the South Oaks Gambling Screen. The pooled random-effects gambling problems prevalence estimate was 30.8% (95% CI = 25.1-37.3). The meta-regression analysis showed that none of the three moderator variables (criteria, timeframe, sample size) were related to the gambling problems prevalence. Common limitations of the included studies entailed not being representative nationally or for the target population, lack of randomization, and low response rate. The meta-analysis was restricted to studies published in a European language.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the studies show that 1 in 3 prisoners has gambling problems and suggests that more emphasis on relevant prevention and treatment is warranted for this population. The study was funded by the Norwegian Competence Center for Gambling and Gaming Research and pre-registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023390552).</p>","PeriodicalId":15049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Addictions","volume":" ","pages":"25-35"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10988396/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Addictions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2024.00005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The overall prevalence of gambling problems across prison populations is currently unknown. The objective of the present study was therefore to quantitatively synthetize prevalence estimates of gambling problems in prison populations using a random effects meta-analytic model and to investigate if the estimates were moderated by time frame, cut-off levels, and sample size.

Methods: To be included the studies had to report original data on the prevalence of gambling problems in a prison sample and to be written in a European language, whereas data based on abstracts or qualitative reports were excluded. The search ended on December 1, 2023 and were conducted in Web of Science, PubMed, Cinahl, PsycINFO, Embase, Google Scholar, Grey Literature Report, and GreyNet. Risk of bias was assessed with a standardized 10-item measure for epidemiological studies.

Results: A total of 26 studies comprising 9,491 participants were included. The vast majority of the participants were males. The most commonly used instrument for assessment of gambling problems was the South Oaks Gambling Screen. The pooled random-effects gambling problems prevalence estimate was 30.8% (95% CI = 25.1-37.3). The meta-regression analysis showed that none of the three moderator variables (criteria, timeframe, sample size) were related to the gambling problems prevalence. Common limitations of the included studies entailed not being representative nationally or for the target population, lack of randomization, and low response rate. The meta-analysis was restricted to studies published in a European language.

Conclusions: Overall, the studies show that 1 in 3 prisoners has gambling problems and suggests that more emphasis on relevant prevention and treatment is warranted for this population. The study was funded by the Norwegian Competence Center for Gambling and Gaming Research and pre-registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023390552).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
监狱人群中赌博问题的流行率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
导言:目前尚不清楚监狱人群中赌博问题的总体流行率。因此,本研究的目的是利用随机效应元分析模型,对监狱人群中赌博问题的流行率估计值进行定量综合,并研究这些估计值是否受时间框架、截止水平和样本大小的影响:纳入的研究必须报告监狱样本中赌博问题流行率的原始数据,并以欧洲语言撰写,而基于摘要或定性报告的数据则被排除在外。检索截止日期为 2023 年 12 月 1 日,检索范围包括 Web of Science、PubMed、Cinahl、PsycINFO、Embase、Google Scholar、Grey Literature Report 和 GreyNet。对流行病学研究的偏倚风险采用标准化的 10 项衡量标准进行评估:结果:共纳入 26 项研究,9 491 名参与者。绝大多数参与者为男性。最常用的赌博问题评估工具是南橡树赌博筛查。汇总的随机效应赌博问题流行率估计为 30.8%(95% CI = 25.1-37.3)。元回归分析表明,三个调节变量(标准、时间范围、样本大小)均与赌博问题流行率无关。所纳入研究的共同局限性包括:不具有全国或目标人群的代表性、缺乏随机性以及响应率低。荟萃分析仅限于以欧洲语言发表的研究:总体而言,这些研究表明,每三名囚犯中就有一人存在赌博问题,这也表明需要更加重视对这一人群的相关预防和治疗。该研究由挪威赌博和博彩研究能力中心资助,并在PROSPERO(CRD42023390552)进行了预先登记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Journal of Behavioral Addictions is to create a forum for the scientific information exchange with regard to behavioral addictions. The journal is a broad focused interdisciplinary one that publishes manuscripts on different approaches of non-substance addictions, research reports focusing on the addictive patterns of various behaviors, especially disorders of the impulsive-compulsive spectrum, and also publishes reviews in these topics. Coverage ranges from genetic and neurobiological research through psychological and clinical psychiatric approaches to epidemiological, sociological and anthropological aspects.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to: Deep learning(s) in gaming disorder through the user-avatar bond: A longitudinal study using machine learning. Machine Learning(s) in gaming disorder through the user-avatar bond: A step towards conceptual and methodological clarity. User-avatar bond as diagnostic indicator for gaming disorder: A word on the side of caution. Long-term changes on behavioral addictions symptoms among adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder treated with methylphenidate. Mainland China's 2021 restrictions on under-18s' video game time were imposed when older 2019 restrictions already applied: Omitting the historical regulatory context is misleading.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1