N Belhomme, A Lescoat, L Dion, P Pottier, E Triby, T Pelaccia
{"title":"The culture of doubt: Do medical students really experience clinical uncertainty when they should?","authors":"N Belhomme, A Lescoat, L Dion, P Pottier, E Triby, T Pelaccia","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2024.2323181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Uncertainty is a fundamental aspect of medical practice, necessitating incorporation into undergraduate medical training. The integrative model of uncertainty tolerance (UT) developed by Hillen and Han serves as a comprehensive framework for exploring clinical uncertainty. While studies have extensively examined UT dimensions, including sources, responses, and moderators, the factors influencing the perception of uncertainty stimuli remain underexplored. However, students' ability to perceive uncertainty and their approach to uncertain stimuli play a crucial role in enabling them to develop adaptive responses to uncertainty, necessary for their comfort in these situations. Defining uncertainty as a metacognitive state suggests significant variability in its perception among individuals and within an individual over time. Moreover, several studies have demonstrated the substantial influence of various individual and contextual factors on how individuals perceive and respond to uncertainty. In this paper, the authors present multiple hypotheses to address the question of whether students genuinely perceive uncertainty stimuli when they should. The authors argue that students' personal relationship with their knowledge is essential in their ability to identify clinical uncertainty, particularly concerning the limits of medical knowledge. Therefore, they propose that an academic culture fostering doubt, through exposing students to a variety of perspectives, would enhance their ability to identify uncertainty zones in a clinical situation at an early stage. Drawing on Dewey's situational theory, the authors emphasize the importance of better understanding, in a work setting, the influence of contextual and situational characteristics on individual perceptions of uncertainty. In line with this idea, ethnographic studies would offer valuable insights into identifying the relationship between the students, their work environment, and their perception of clinical uncertainty.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":" ","pages":"163-165"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2323181","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Uncertainty is a fundamental aspect of medical practice, necessitating incorporation into undergraduate medical training. The integrative model of uncertainty tolerance (UT) developed by Hillen and Han serves as a comprehensive framework for exploring clinical uncertainty. While studies have extensively examined UT dimensions, including sources, responses, and moderators, the factors influencing the perception of uncertainty stimuli remain underexplored. However, students' ability to perceive uncertainty and their approach to uncertain stimuli play a crucial role in enabling them to develop adaptive responses to uncertainty, necessary for their comfort in these situations. Defining uncertainty as a metacognitive state suggests significant variability in its perception among individuals and within an individual over time. Moreover, several studies have demonstrated the substantial influence of various individual and contextual factors on how individuals perceive and respond to uncertainty. In this paper, the authors present multiple hypotheses to address the question of whether students genuinely perceive uncertainty stimuli when they should. The authors argue that students' personal relationship with their knowledge is essential in their ability to identify clinical uncertainty, particularly concerning the limits of medical knowledge. Therefore, they propose that an academic culture fostering doubt, through exposing students to a variety of perspectives, would enhance their ability to identify uncertainty zones in a clinical situation at an early stage. Drawing on Dewey's situational theory, the authors emphasize the importance of better understanding, in a work setting, the influence of contextual and situational characteristics on individual perceptions of uncertainty. In line with this idea, ethnographic studies would offer valuable insights into identifying the relationship between the students, their work environment, and their perception of clinical uncertainty.
不确定性是医学实践的一个基本方面,有必要将其纳入本科医学培训。Hillen 和 Han 提出的不确定性耐受性(UT)综合模型是探索临床不确定性的综合框架。虽然已有研究广泛考察了UT的各个维度,包括来源、反应和调节因素,但对影响不确定性刺激感知的因素仍未进行深入探讨。然而,学生感知不确定性的能力以及他们处理不确定性刺激的方法在使他们对不确定性做出适应性反应方面起着至关重要的作用,而这正是他们在这些情况下保持舒适的必要条件。将不确定性定义为一种元认知状态表明,个体之间以及个体内部对不确定性的感知随着时间的推移存在很大的差异。此外,多项研究表明,各种个体因素和环境因素对个体如何感知和应对不确定性有着重大影响。在本文中,作者提出了多个假设,以解决学生是否在应该感知不确定性刺激时真正感知到不确定性刺激的问题。作者认为,学生个人与知识之间的关系对于他们识别临床不确定性的能力至关重要,尤其是在医学知识的局限性方面。因此,他们提出,通过让学生接触各种不同的视角,营造一种鼓励怀疑的学术文化,将提高他们在早期阶段识别临床情况中不确定性区域的能力。根据杜威的情境理论,作者强调了在工作环境中更好地理解背景和情境特征对个人不确定性感知的影响的重要性。根据这一观点,人种学研究将为确定学生、他们的工作环境和他们对临床不确定性的感知之间的关系提供有价值的见解。
期刊介绍:
Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.