Ecological Predictors of Organelle Genome Evolution: Phylogenetic Correlations with Taxonomically Broad, Sparse, Unsystematized Data.

IF 6.1 1区 生物学 Q1 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY Systematic Biology Pub Date : 2024-07-27 DOI:10.1093/sysbio/syae009
Konstantinos Giannakis, Luke Richards, Iain G Johnston
{"title":"Ecological Predictors of Organelle Genome Evolution: Phylogenetic Correlations with Taxonomically Broad, Sparse, Unsystematized Data.","authors":"Konstantinos Giannakis, Luke Richards, Iain G Johnston","doi":"10.1093/sysbio/syae009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Comparative analysis of variables across phylogenetically linked observations can reveal mechanisms and insights in evolutionary biology. As the taxonomic breadth of the sample of interest increases, challenges of data sparsity, poor phylogenetic resolution, and complicated evolutionary dynamics emerge. Here, we investigate a cross-eukaryotic question where all these problems exist: which organismal ecology features are correlated with gene retention in mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA (organelle DNA or oDNA). Through a wide palette of synthetic control studies, we first characterize the specificity and sensitivity of a collection of parametric and non-parametric phylogenetic comparative approaches to identify relationships in the face of such sparse and awkward datasets. This analysis is not directly focused on oDNA, and so provides generalizable insights into comparative approaches with challenging data. We then combine and curate ecological data coupled to oDNA genome information across eukaryotes, including a new semi-automated approach for gathering data on organismal traits from less systematized open-access resources including encyclopedia articles on species and taxa. The curation process also involved resolving several issues with existing datasets, including enforcing the clade-specificity of several ecological features and fixing incorrect annotations. Combining this unique dataset with our benchmarked comparative approaches, we confirm support for several known links between organismal ecology and organelle gene retention, identify several previously unidentified relationships constituting possible ecological contributors to oDNA genome evolution, and provide support for a recently hypothesized link between environmental demand and oDNA retention. We, with caution, discuss the implications of these findings for organelle evolution and of this pipeline for broad comparative analyses in other fields.</p>","PeriodicalId":22120,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11282362/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syae009","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comparative analysis of variables across phylogenetically linked observations can reveal mechanisms and insights in evolutionary biology. As the taxonomic breadth of the sample of interest increases, challenges of data sparsity, poor phylogenetic resolution, and complicated evolutionary dynamics emerge. Here, we investigate a cross-eukaryotic question where all these problems exist: which organismal ecology features are correlated with gene retention in mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA (organelle DNA or oDNA). Through a wide palette of synthetic control studies, we first characterize the specificity and sensitivity of a collection of parametric and non-parametric phylogenetic comparative approaches to identify relationships in the face of such sparse and awkward datasets. This analysis is not directly focused on oDNA, and so provides generalizable insights into comparative approaches with challenging data. We then combine and curate ecological data coupled to oDNA genome information across eukaryotes, including a new semi-automated approach for gathering data on organismal traits from less systematized open-access resources including encyclopedia articles on species and taxa. The curation process also involved resolving several issues with existing datasets, including enforcing the clade-specificity of several ecological features and fixing incorrect annotations. Combining this unique dataset with our benchmarked comparative approaches, we confirm support for several known links between organismal ecology and organelle gene retention, identify several previously unidentified relationships constituting possible ecological contributors to oDNA genome evolution, and provide support for a recently hypothesized link between environmental demand and oDNA retention. We, with caution, discuss the implications of these findings for organelle evolution and of this pipeline for broad comparative analyses in other fields.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
细胞器基因组进化的生态学预测因素:与分类广泛、稀疏、非系统化数据的系统发育相关性。
对具有系统发育联系的观测数据中的变量进行比较分析,可以揭示生物进化的机制和规律。随着感兴趣样本的分类广度增加,数据稀少、系统发育分辨率低和复杂的进化动态等挑战也随之出现。在这里,我们研究了一个存在所有这些问题的跨真核生物问题:哪些生物生态学特征与线粒体和叶绿体 DNA(细胞器 DNA 或 oDNA)中的基因保留相关。通过广泛的合成对照研究,我们首先确定了一系列参数和非参数系统发育比较方法的特异性和灵敏度,以便在面对如此稀少和笨拙的数据集时识别各种关系。这项分析并不直接针对 oDNA,因此能为具有挑战性数据的比较方法提供具有普遍意义的见解。然后,我们将生态学数据与真核生物的 oDNA 基因组信息结合起来并进行整理,包括采用一种新的半自动化方法,从系统化程度较低的开放获取资源(包括物种和类群的百科全书文章)中收集有关生物特征的数据。整理过程还涉及解决现有数据集的几个问题,包括强制执行几个生态特征的支系特异性和修正不正确的注释。通过将这一独特的数据集与我们的基准比较方法相结合,我们证实了生物生态学与细胞器基因保留之间的几种已知联系,确定了构成 oDNA 基因组进化的可能生态因素的几种以前未确定的关系,并为最近假设的环境需求与 oDNA 保留之间的联系提供了支持。我们谨慎地讨论了这些发现对细胞器进化的影响,以及这一管道对其他领域广泛比较分析的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Biology
Systematic Biology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
70
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Biology is the bimonthly journal of the Society of Systematic Biologists. Papers for the journal are original contributions to the theory, principles, and methods of systematics as well as phylogeny, evolution, morphology, biogeography, paleontology, genetics, and the classification of all living things. A Points of View section offers a forum for discussion, while book reviews and announcements of general interest are also featured.
期刊最新文献
The limits of the metapopulation: Lineage fragmentation in a widespread terrestrial salamander (Plethodon cinereus) Dating in the Dark: Elevated Substitution Rates in Cave Cockroaches (Blattodea: Nocticolidae) Have Negative Impacts on Molecular Date Estimates. Clockor2: Inferring Global and Local Strict Molecular Clocks Using Root-to-Tip Regression. Phylogenomics of Neogastropoda: The Backbone Hidden in the Bush. Distinguishing Cophylogenetic Signal from Phylogenetic Congruence Clarifies the Interplay Between Evolutionary History and Species Interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1