Morgan D. T. Frost, Kimberly J. Komatsu, Lauren M. Porensky, Kurt O. Reinhart, Kevin R. Wilcox, Zachary L. T. Bunch, Ashley D. Jolin, Katielyn A. Johnston, Gracen E. Trimas, Sally E. Koerner
{"title":"Plant, insect, and soil microbial communities vary across brome invasion gradients in northern mixed‐grass prairies","authors":"Morgan D. T. Frost, Kimberly J. Komatsu, Lauren M. Porensky, Kurt O. Reinhart, Kevin R. Wilcox, Zachary L. T. Bunch, Ashley D. Jolin, Katielyn A. Johnston, Gracen E. Trimas, Sally E. Koerner","doi":"10.1111/oik.10515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Species interactions shape native plant communities, influencing both composition and ecosystem processes, with invasion by non‐native species threatening these dynamic relationships, native species, and function. The consequences of invasive plants in particular may stretch across taxa to impact plant, insect, and soil microbial communities directly and indirectly, with consequences for ecological functioning. In northern mixed‐grass prairies in the United States, invasion by two annual brome grasses, <jats:italic>Bromus arvensis</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>B. tectorum</jats:italic>, negatively impacts rangeland plants; however, the simultaneous effects on insects and soil microbes (bacteria and archaea), and the implications for ecological function, have received less attention. Here, using observational field studies conducted at two mixed‐grass prairie sites in Montana and Wyoming, we assessed the relationships between plants, insects, and soil microbes across gradients of invasion by <jats:italic>B. arvensis</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>B. tectorum</jats:italic>. Overall, we found differences in plant and insect communities and functional groups with increasing invasion abundance for both brome species. However, associations between invasion and the soil microbial community were species specific, as we only saw these relationships under <jats:italic>B. tectorum</jats:italic> invasion, implying <jats:italic>B. tectorum</jats:italic> may have more substantial consequences for rangeland management. While invasion by annual bromes may cause changes in certain plant and insect functional groups, such as C<jats:sub>4</jats:sub> perennial grasses and certain insect herbivores, soil microbial functional groups may be less impacted, especially under <jats:italic>B. arvensis</jats:italic> invasion. This work sheds light on the need to explore changes in natural communities across taxa and to all invasive species, as ecosystem effects are likely to be contingent upon both.","PeriodicalId":19496,"journal":{"name":"Oikos","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oikos","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.10515","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Species interactions shape native plant communities, influencing both composition and ecosystem processes, with invasion by non‐native species threatening these dynamic relationships, native species, and function. The consequences of invasive plants in particular may stretch across taxa to impact plant, insect, and soil microbial communities directly and indirectly, with consequences for ecological functioning. In northern mixed‐grass prairies in the United States, invasion by two annual brome grasses, Bromus arvensis and B. tectorum, negatively impacts rangeland plants; however, the simultaneous effects on insects and soil microbes (bacteria and archaea), and the implications for ecological function, have received less attention. Here, using observational field studies conducted at two mixed‐grass prairie sites in Montana and Wyoming, we assessed the relationships between plants, insects, and soil microbes across gradients of invasion by B. arvensis and B. tectorum. Overall, we found differences in plant and insect communities and functional groups with increasing invasion abundance for both brome species. However, associations between invasion and the soil microbial community were species specific, as we only saw these relationships under B. tectorum invasion, implying B. tectorum may have more substantial consequences for rangeland management. While invasion by annual bromes may cause changes in certain plant and insect functional groups, such as C4 perennial grasses and certain insect herbivores, soil microbial functional groups may be less impacted, especially under B. arvensis invasion. This work sheds light on the need to explore changes in natural communities across taxa and to all invasive species, as ecosystem effects are likely to be contingent upon both.
物种间的相互作用塑造了本地植物群落,影响着其组成和生态系统过程,而非本地物种的入侵则威胁着这些动态关系、本地物种和功能。特别是入侵植物的后果可能会延伸到各个类群,直接或间接地影响植物、昆虫和土壤微生物群落,从而对生态功能造成影响。在美国北部混合草草原,两种一年生锦鸡儿草(Bromus arvensis 和 B. tectorum)的入侵对牧场植物产生了负面影响;然而,同时对昆虫和土壤微生物(细菌和古细菌)产生的影响以及对生态功能的影响却较少受到关注。在这里,我们利用在蒙大拿州和怀俄明州的两个混合草草原地点进行的野外观察研究,评估了在 B. arvensis 和 B. tectorum 入侵梯度上植物、昆虫和土壤微生物之间的关系。总体而言,我们发现随着入侵丰度的增加,这两种锦鸡儿属植物和昆虫群落及功能群之间存在差异。然而,入侵与土壤微生物群落之间的关系是有物种特异性的,因为我们只在 B. tectorum 入侵的情况下看到了这些关系,这意味着 B. tectorum 可能会对牧场管理产生更大的影响。虽然一年生草本植物的入侵可能会导致某些植物和昆虫功能群的变化,如 C4 多年生禾本科植物和某些昆虫食草动物,但土壤微生物功能群受到的影响可能较小,尤其是在 B. arvensis 入侵的情况下。这项研究揭示了探索不同类群的自然群落变化以及所有入侵物种变化的必要性,因为生态系统的影响可能取决于这两方面。
期刊介绍:
Oikos publishes original and innovative research on all aspects of ecology, defined as organism-environment interactions at various spatiotemporal scales, so including macroecology and evolutionary ecology. Emphasis is on theoretical and empirical work aimed at generalization and synthesis across taxa, systems and ecological disciplines. Papers can contribute to new developments in ecology by reporting novel theory or critical empirical results, and "synthesis" can include developing new theory, tests of general hypotheses, or bringing together established or emerging areas of ecology. Confirming or extending the established literature, by for example showing results that are novel for a new taxon, or purely applied research, is given low priority.