Jeffery R. Hughey, Kathy Ann Miller, Paul W. Gabrielson
{"title":"Genetic analysis of Ulva (Ulvaceae, Chlorophyta) type specimens resolves northeast Pacific blade-forming species","authors":"Jeffery R. Hughey, Kathy Ann Miller, Paul W. Gabrielson","doi":"10.1515/bot-2023-0072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Misapplication of <jats:italic>Ulva</jats:italic> epithets in GenBank has led to confusion in the scientific literature and community. To solve some of the problems, targeted DNA sequencing of plastid encoded <jats:italic>rbc</jats:italic>L gene amplicons or high-throughput sequencing was performed on all blade-forming <jats:italic>Ulva</jats:italic> type specimens from the northeast Pacific. Recently collected specimens from at or near type localities were also analyzed for some taxa. Based on these genetic analyses, we confirmed currently recognized species: <jats:italic>U. californica</jats:italic>, with <jats:italic>U. angusta</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>U. scagelii</jats:italic> as heterotypic synonyms, <jats:italic>U. stenophylla</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>U. taeniata</jats:italic>, and <jats:italic>U. tanneri</jats:italic>. <jats:italic>Ulva dactylifera</jats:italic>, currently considered a synonym of <jats:italic>U. taeniata</jats:italic> based on morpho-anatomy, is recognized as a distinct species, as is <jats:italic>U. expansa</jats:italic> whose type specimen was sequenced in 2018. All but two of the ITS, <jats:italic>rbc</jats:italic>L and <jats:italic>tuf</jats:italic>A sequences in GenBank that were labeled <jats:italic>U. californica</jats:italic> were correctly named, in contrast to <jats:italic>U. taeniata</jats:italic>, for which only one of 14 sequences was correctly labeled. These results show that DNA sequencing of <jats:italic>Ulva</jats:italic> type specimens is essential for the correct application of names.","PeriodicalId":9191,"journal":{"name":"Botanica Marina","volume":"133 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Botanica Marina","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/bot-2023-0072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Misapplication of Ulva epithets in GenBank has led to confusion in the scientific literature and community. To solve some of the problems, targeted DNA sequencing of plastid encoded rbcL gene amplicons or high-throughput sequencing was performed on all blade-forming Ulva type specimens from the northeast Pacific. Recently collected specimens from at or near type localities were also analyzed for some taxa. Based on these genetic analyses, we confirmed currently recognized species: U. californica, with U. angusta and U. scagelii as heterotypic synonyms, U. stenophylla, U. taeniata, and U. tanneri. Ulva dactylifera, currently considered a synonym of U. taeniata based on morpho-anatomy, is recognized as a distinct species, as is U. expansa whose type specimen was sequenced in 2018. All but two of the ITS, rbcL and tufA sequences in GenBank that were labeled U. californica were correctly named, in contrast to U. taeniata, for which only one of 14 sequences was correctly labeled. These results show that DNA sequencing of Ulva type specimens is essential for the correct application of names.
期刊介绍:
Botanica Marina publishes high-quality contributions from all of the disciplines of marine botany at all levels of biological organisation from subcellular to ecosystem: chemistry and applications, genomics, physiology and ecology, phylogeny and biogeography. Research involving global or interdisciplinary interest is especially welcome. Applied science papers are appreciated, particularly when they illustrate the application of emerging conceptual issues or promote developing technologies. The journal invites state-of-the art reviews dealing with recent developments in marine botany.