How and Why Teachers Taught About the 2020 U.S. Election: An Analysis of Survey Responses From Twelve States

IF 3.5 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Aera Open Pub Date : 2024-03-09 DOI:10.1177/23328584241234884
Paul G. Fitchett, Brett L. M. Levy, Jeremy D. Stoddard
{"title":"How and Why Teachers Taught About the 2020 U.S. Election: An Analysis of Survey Responses From Twelve States","authors":"Paul G. Fitchett, Brett L. M. Levy, Jeremy D. Stoddard","doi":"10.1177/23328584241234884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores social studies teachers’ self-reported instruction about teaching the 2020 election in U.S. secondary schools. We analyzed survey responses from 1,723 secondary social studies teachers from 12 states (3 left-leaning, 3 right-leaning, 6 battleground) collected in the weeks after the election, examining self-reported pedagogies, topics taught, and overall frequency of teaching about the election. Respondents reported teaching about the election more frequently if they taught courses in civics or government and/or if they had greater control over their curricula. Analyses indicated that teachers’ demographic characteristics, teaching contexts, and ideologies about civic education were related to the election-related topics they taught and the instructional practices they employed. Our findings have important implications for educators, administrators, policymakers, and others interested in strengthening civic learning.","PeriodicalId":31132,"journal":{"name":"Aera Open","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aera Open","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584241234884","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores social studies teachers’ self-reported instruction about teaching the 2020 election in U.S. secondary schools. We analyzed survey responses from 1,723 secondary social studies teachers from 12 states (3 left-leaning, 3 right-leaning, 6 battleground) collected in the weeks after the election, examining self-reported pedagogies, topics taught, and overall frequency of teaching about the election. Respondents reported teaching about the election more frequently if they taught courses in civics or government and/or if they had greater control over their curricula. Analyses indicated that teachers’ demographic characteristics, teaching contexts, and ideologies about civic education were related to the election-related topics they taught and the instructional practices they employed. Our findings have important implications for educators, administrators, policymakers, and others interested in strengthening civic learning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师如何及为何教授 2020 年美国大选:十二个州的调查反馈分析
本研究探讨了社会研究教师自我报告的美国中学 2020 年大选教学情况。我们分析了来自 12 个州(3 个左倾州、3 个右倾州、6 个战场州)的 1723 名中学社会学教师在大选后几周内的调查反馈,研究了自我报告的教学方法、教授的主题以及教授大选的总体频率。受访者表示,如果他们教授的是公民或政府课程,和/或如果他们对自己的课程有更大的控制权,那么他们教授大选的频率会更高。分析表明,教师的人口统计特征、教学背景和公民教育意识形态与他们教授的选举相关主题和采用的教学方法有关。我们的研究结果对教育工作者、管理者、政策制定者以及其他有志于加强公民学习的人具有重要的启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aera Open
Aera Open EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
60
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cross-National Comparison of the Relative Size of Lower-Tail and Upper-Tail SES Achievement Gaps Measuring the Efficacy of Zearn Math in Louisiana Undergraduate Grading Practices of International and Domestic Faculty: Evidence From Three Large U.S. Public Universities Does Knowing the Word Matter for Preschool DLLS? Individualized Vocabulary Words on Phonological Awareness Performance Silent Covenants and Structural Barriers: State Standards Committees and the Maintenance of Race-Evasive Social Studies Standards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1