Different Response of the Ionospheric TEC and EEJ to Ultra-Fast Kelvin Waves in the Mesosphere and Lower Thermosphere

IF 3.7 2区 地球科学 Space Weather Pub Date : 2024-03-07 DOI:10.1029/2023sw003699
Ruidi Sun, Sheng-Yang Gu, Xiankang Dou, Yusong Qin, Yafei Wei
{"title":"Different Response of the Ionospheric TEC and EEJ to Ultra-Fast Kelvin Waves in the Mesosphere and Lower Thermosphere","authors":"Ruidi Sun, Sheng-Yang Gu, Xiankang Dou, Yusong Qin, Yafei Wei","doi":"10.1029/2023sw003699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We studied the response of ionospheric total electron content (TEC) and equatorial electrojet (EEJ) to the ultra-fast Kelvin wave (UFKW) at the equator in the mesosphere using zonal wind data obtained from TIMED Doppler Interferometer (TIDI), EEJ data over the monitoring station Jicamarca (12°S, 77°W) and global TEC maps. The least squares fitting method is utilized to perform a spectral analysis of zonal wind, EEJ and TEC. Our analysis results demonstrate that UFKW events can be divided into four categories: (a) UFKW events with both TEC and EEJ response; (b) UFKW events with TEC response but without EEJ response; (c) UFKW events with EEJ response but without TEC response; (d) UFKW events without neither TEC response nor EEJ response. The first type of UFKW events occur the most often and is generally thought to generate a response in EEJ at approximately 105–110 km through the dynamo effect. The polarization electric field associated with EEJ then produces a response in the ionospheric TEC through the fountain effect. The lack of EEJ response in the second type of UFKWs may be due to the influence of eastward background winds. We found that all UFKW events with EEJ response have a response in TEC. The fourth type of UFKWs have smaller amplitudes, shorter vertical wavelengths and longer periods, which make them more likely to dissipate and cannot propagate to higher altitudes. These UFKWs cannot propagate to the altitude of EEJ and produce a response in EEJ, much less in TEC.","PeriodicalId":22181,"journal":{"name":"Space Weather","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Space Weather","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2023sw003699","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We studied the response of ionospheric total electron content (TEC) and equatorial electrojet (EEJ) to the ultra-fast Kelvin wave (UFKW) at the equator in the mesosphere using zonal wind data obtained from TIMED Doppler Interferometer (TIDI), EEJ data over the monitoring station Jicamarca (12°S, 77°W) and global TEC maps. The least squares fitting method is utilized to perform a spectral analysis of zonal wind, EEJ and TEC. Our analysis results demonstrate that UFKW events can be divided into four categories: (a) UFKW events with both TEC and EEJ response; (b) UFKW events with TEC response but without EEJ response; (c) UFKW events with EEJ response but without TEC response; (d) UFKW events without neither TEC response nor EEJ response. The first type of UFKW events occur the most often and is generally thought to generate a response in EEJ at approximately 105–110 km through the dynamo effect. The polarization electric field associated with EEJ then produces a response in the ionospheric TEC through the fountain effect. The lack of EEJ response in the second type of UFKWs may be due to the influence of eastward background winds. We found that all UFKW events with EEJ response have a response in TEC. The fourth type of UFKWs have smaller amplitudes, shorter vertical wavelengths and longer periods, which make them more likely to dissipate and cannot propagate to higher altitudes. These UFKWs cannot propagate to the altitude of EEJ and produce a response in EEJ, much less in TEC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电离层 TEC 和 EEJ 对中间层和低热层超快开尔文波的不同响应
我们利用从 TIMED 多普勒干涉仪(TIDI)获得的带状风数据、监测站 Jicamarca(南纬 12°,西经 77°)上空的 EEJ 数据和全球 TEC 地图,研究了电离层电子总含量(TEC)和赤道电射流(EEJ)对赤道中层超快开尔文波(UFKW)的响应。利用最小二乘拟合方法对带状风、EEJ 和 TEC 进行了频谱分析。分析结果表明,UFKW 事件可分为四类:(a) UFKW 事件同时具有 TEC 和 EEJ 响应;(b) UFKW 事件具有 TEC 响应,但没有 EEJ 响应;(c) UFKW 事件具有 EEJ 响应,但没有 TEC 响应;(d) UFKW 事件既没有 TEC 响应,也没有 EEJ 响应。第一类 UFKW 事件发生得最频繁,一般认为是通过动力效应在大约 105-110 公里处的 EEJ 产生了响应。然后,与 EEJ 相关的极化电场通过喷泉效应在电离层 TEC 中产生响应。第二类 UFKW 缺乏 EEJ 响应可能是由于东向背景风的影响。我们发现,所有具有 EEJ 响应的 UFKW 事件都有 TEC 响应。第四类 UFKW 的振幅较小,垂直波长较短,周期较长,因此更容易消散,无法向高空传播。这些 UFKW 无法传播到 EEJ 高度并在 EEJ 中产生响应,更不会在 TEC 中产生响应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
29.70%
发文量
166
期刊最新文献
Quantification of Representation Error in the Neutral Winds and Ion Drifts Using Data Assimilation A Novel Ionospheric Inversion Model: PINN-SAMI3 (Physics Informed Neural Network Based on SAMI3) Nowcasting Solar EUV Irradiance With Photospheric Magnetic Fields and the Mg II Index Calculating the High-Latitude Ionospheric Electrodynamics Using a Machine Learning-Based Field-Aligned Current Model Effects of Forbush Decreases on the Global Electric Circuit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1