Social Cognitive Predictors of Bystander Intervention in Racial Microaggressions Among College Students

IF 2.8 2区 社会学 Q1 ETHNIC STUDIES Race and Social Problems Pub Date : 2024-03-08 DOI:10.1007/s12552-024-09412-2
Laura Reid Marks, Lyndsay Jenkins, Lara Perez-Felkner, Da’Shay Portis Templeton, Khyati Verma
{"title":"Social Cognitive Predictors of Bystander Intervention in Racial Microaggressions Among College Students","authors":"Laura Reid Marks, Lyndsay Jenkins, Lara Perez-Felkner, Da’Shay Portis Templeton, Khyati Verma","doi":"10.1007/s12552-024-09412-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Integrating microintervention strategies and the bystander intervention model, we examined social cognitive predictors (i.e., moral disengagement, empathy, and self-efficacy) of the five steps of the bystander intervention model (i.e., Notice, Interpret, Accept, Know, and Act) to address racial microaggressions in a sample of 452 racially diverse college students. Data were collected using an online survey. Path analyses showed that moral disengagement was significantly and negatively related to each step of the model for White students, but for students of color, it was only significantly negatively associated with Act. Empathy was significantly and positively associated with Interpret, Accept, and Act for White students. For student of color, however, there was a significant and positive association solely between Empathy and Act. For both White students and students of color, self-efficacy was positively associated with Notice, Interpret, Accept, Know, and Act. Finally, race did not significantly moderate any relationships. Strengths, limitations, future directions for research, and implications of the study findings are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":46715,"journal":{"name":"Race and Social Problems","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Race and Social Problems","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-024-09412-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integrating microintervention strategies and the bystander intervention model, we examined social cognitive predictors (i.e., moral disengagement, empathy, and self-efficacy) of the five steps of the bystander intervention model (i.e., Notice, Interpret, Accept, Know, and Act) to address racial microaggressions in a sample of 452 racially diverse college students. Data were collected using an online survey. Path analyses showed that moral disengagement was significantly and negatively related to each step of the model for White students, but for students of color, it was only significantly negatively associated with Act. Empathy was significantly and positively associated with Interpret, Accept, and Act for White students. For student of color, however, there was a significant and positive association solely between Empathy and Act. For both White students and students of color, self-efficacy was positively associated with Notice, Interpret, Accept, Know, and Act. Finally, race did not significantly moderate any relationships. Strengths, limitations, future directions for research, and implications of the study findings are discussed.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学生种族微冒犯中旁观者干预的社会认知预测因素
结合微干预策略和旁观者干预模式,我们研究了旁观者干预模式五个步骤(即注意、解释、接受、了解和行动)的社会认知预测因素(即道德脱离、移情和自我效能),以解决 452 名不同种族大学生的种族微诽谤问题。数据是通过在线调查收集的。路径分析显示,对于白人学生来说,道德偏离与模型的每一步都有显著的负相关,但对于有色人种学生来说,道德偏离只与 "行动 "有显著的负相关。对于白人学生来说,移情与 "解读"、"接受 "和 "行动 "有明显的正相关。然而,对于有色人种学生而言,移情只与 "行动 "呈显著正相关。无论是白人学生还是有色人种学生,自我效能感都与 "注意"、"解释"、"接受"、"了解 "和 "行动 "呈正相关。最后,种族并没有在很大程度上调节任何关系。本文讨论了研究结果的优势、局限性、未来研究方向和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.50%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Race and Social Problems (RASP) provides a multidisciplinary forum for the publication of articles and discussion of issues germane to race and its enduring relationship to socioeconomic, psychological, political, and cultural problems. The journal publishes original empirical studies, reviews of past research, theoretical studies, and invited essays that advance the understanding of the complexities of race and its relationship to social problems.  Submissions from the fields of social work, anthropology, communications, criminology, economics, history, law, political science, psychology, public health, and sociology are welcome.
期刊最新文献
How Collection of Racial Demographics Highlights or Hides Participants’ Multiraciality: An Illustrative Example and Warning for Social Scientists The Relationship Between Intimate Partner Violence Policing and Family Surveillance in Large U.S. Counties Unequal Returns: Exploring Racial Differences in the Mental Health Benefits of Religious Service Attendance among Low-Income Mothers American Entrepreneur 1990–2010: Black Business Ownership as a Path Way Out of Poverty & Violence Cultural Socialization and Civic Engagement Among Racially Diverse Students of Color: Examining Ethnic-Racial Identity Components as Mediators and Neighborhood Racial Composition as a Moderator
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1