Bibliometric analysis of studies on threat assessment and prioritization of species for conservation

Z. A. Wani, S. Pant, J. Bhat, Mohd Tariq, Sazada Siddiqui, Mohammed O. Alshaharni
{"title":"Bibliometric analysis of studies on threat assessment and prioritization of species for conservation","authors":"Z. A. Wani, S. Pant, J. Bhat, Mohd Tariq, Sazada Siddiqui, Mohammed O. Alshaharni","doi":"10.3389/ffgc.2024.1374120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study investigated the evolution and current situation of research on threat assessment and prioritization of species for conservation at a global level by analyzing bibliometrically the most relevant and productive authors, sources, and countries, most cited papers, country collaborations and most frequent keywords as reflected in the scientific literature using the Web of Science database. From 1989–2022, a total of 315 relevant documents were retrieved from 129 sources. Results revealed that since 1989, there has been an increase in the number of publications on threat assessment and prioritization of species for conservation. A total of 1,300 authors have contributed to the field through their research contributions. Among the 129 sources, the journals ‘Biodiversity and Conservation’ and ‘Biological Conservation’ are the most relevant and productive. Among countries, the USA has produced the highest number of publications, whereas Benin has the highest Multiple Country Production with a rate of 71.4%. Among the authors, ‘Keith DA’ has received the most citations, and among the sources, the journal ‘Biological Conservation’ received the highest number of citations. Conservation, biodiversity, conservation priorities, species richness, and threatened species are the most frequently used keywords and follow power-law distribution. The present study will be useful to the researchers in determining which journals to target and how to identify potential research partners in the concerned field. It is recommended that institutions in developed countries be encouraged to lead research programs in developing and underdeveloped countries so that such studies will be carried out at local, regional, and global scale, as biodiversity loss is a global issue.","PeriodicalId":507254,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change","volume":"67 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2024.1374120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study investigated the evolution and current situation of research on threat assessment and prioritization of species for conservation at a global level by analyzing bibliometrically the most relevant and productive authors, sources, and countries, most cited papers, country collaborations and most frequent keywords as reflected in the scientific literature using the Web of Science database. From 1989–2022, a total of 315 relevant documents were retrieved from 129 sources. Results revealed that since 1989, there has been an increase in the number of publications on threat assessment and prioritization of species for conservation. A total of 1,300 authors have contributed to the field through their research contributions. Among the 129 sources, the journals ‘Biodiversity and Conservation’ and ‘Biological Conservation’ are the most relevant and productive. Among countries, the USA has produced the highest number of publications, whereas Benin has the highest Multiple Country Production with a rate of 71.4%. Among the authors, ‘Keith DA’ has received the most citations, and among the sources, the journal ‘Biological Conservation’ received the highest number of citations. Conservation, biodiversity, conservation priorities, species richness, and threatened species are the most frequently used keywords and follow power-law distribution. The present study will be useful to the researchers in determining which journals to target and how to identify potential research partners in the concerned field. It is recommended that institutions in developed countries be encouraged to lead research programs in developing and underdeveloped countries so that such studies will be carried out at local, regional, and global scale, as biodiversity loss is a global issue.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
威胁评估和物种保护优先次序研究的文献计量分析
本研究通过使用科学网数据库对科学文献中反映的最相关、最有成果的作者、来源和国家、被引用次数最多的论文、国家合作以及最常见的关键词进行文献计量学分析,调查了全球范围内物种保护威胁评估和优先级排序研究的演变和现状。从 1989 年到 2022 年,共从 129 个来源检索到 315 篇相关文献。结果显示,自 1989 年以来,有关威胁评估和物种保护优先次序的出版物数量有所增加。共有 1,300 位作者通过他们的研究成果为该领域做出了贡献。在 129 个资料来源中,《生物多样性与保护》和《生物保护》期刊是最相关和最有成果的。在各国中,美国的出版物数量最多,而贝宁的 "多国出版 "率最高,达到 71.4%。在作者中,"Keith DA "被引用的次数最多;在来源中,"生物保护 "期刊被引用的次数最多。保护、生物多样性、保护重点、物种丰富度和濒危物种是使用频率最高的关键词,且呈幂律分布。本研究将有助于研究人员确定目标期刊以及如何确定相关领域的潜在研究合作伙伴。建议鼓励发达国家的机构领导发展中国家和不发达国家的研究项目,以便在地方、区域和全球范围内开展此类研究,因为生物多样性的丧失是一个全球性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of GM (1,1) to predict the dynamics of stand carbon storage in Pinus Kesiya var. langbianensis natural forests Forest zone and root compartments outweigh long-term nutrient enrichment in structuring arid mangrove root microbiomes Soil amendment mitigates mortality from drought and heat waves in dryland tree juveniles Analysis of mangrove distribution and suitable habitat in Beihai, China, using optimized MaxEnt modeling: improving mangrove restoration efficiency Addressing the altitudinal and geographical gradient in European beech via photosynthetic parameters: a case study on Calabrian beech transplanted to Denmark
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1