Vaccine hesitancy in healthcare professionals and health sciences students of the last courses

Sergi Gomez , Pere Godoy
{"title":"Vaccine hesitancy in healthcare professionals and health sciences students of the last courses","authors":"Sergi Gomez ,&nbsp;Pere Godoy","doi":"10.1016/j.vacune.2024.02.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the vaccination hesitancy of health professionals and students in the last courses of the medical and nursing degrees.</p></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><p>Cross-sectional study in which the data of the students of the last courses of the main universities of Lleida and Barcelona and of the doctors and nurses teaching staff of them have been collected. The collection was done through a previously validated questionnaire about their opinions regarding different aspects of the vaccines and the fact of having delayed or refused the administration of a vaccine. The dependent variable was vaccine hesitancy and its association with the main independent variables was determined with the odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). The ORs were adjusted using logistic regression models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A 33% of vaccine hesitancy has been found among health professionals and students in the last courses, with 12% of people who have refused the administration of any vaccine. It is higher in women and nurses. The main rejected vaccines have been, in order, flu, COVID, and HPV and the main reasons, not believing them necessary, safe or effective.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Up to a third of health professionals or students have vaccine hesitancy, especially nursing staff, the main collective in charge of administering vaccines who, according to other studies, have more relevance in population vaccination hesitancy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101272,"journal":{"name":"Vacunas (English Edition)","volume":"25 1","pages":"Pages 54-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vacunas (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2445146024000189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the vaccination hesitancy of health professionals and students in the last courses of the medical and nursing degrees.

Material and method

Cross-sectional study in which the data of the students of the last courses of the main universities of Lleida and Barcelona and of the doctors and nurses teaching staff of them have been collected. The collection was done through a previously validated questionnaire about their opinions regarding different aspects of the vaccines and the fact of having delayed or refused the administration of a vaccine. The dependent variable was vaccine hesitancy and its association with the main independent variables was determined with the odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). The ORs were adjusted using logistic regression models.

Results

A 33% of vaccine hesitancy has been found among health professionals and students in the last courses, with 12% of people who have refused the administration of any vaccine. It is higher in women and nurses. The main rejected vaccines have been, in order, flu, COVID, and HPV and the main reasons, not believing them necessary, safe or effective.

Conclusions

Up to a third of health professionals or students have vaccine hesitancy, especially nursing staff, the main collective in charge of administering vaccines who, according to other studies, have more relevance in population vaccination hesitancy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健专业人员和最后几门课程的健康科学学生对疫苗的犹豫态度
材料和方法横断面研究收集了莱里达和巴塞罗那两所主要大学最后一门课程的学生以及医生和护士教学人员的数据。数据收集是通过一份事先经过验证的调查问卷进行的,问卷内容涉及他们对疫苗不同方面的看法,以及曾延迟或拒绝接种疫苗的事实。因变量是疫苗接种犹豫不决,其与主要自变量的关系通过几率比(OR)及其 95% 的置信区间(CI)来确定。使用逻辑回归模型对比值进行了调整。结果 在最后一门课程中发现,卫生专业人员和学生的疫苗接种犹豫率为 33%,其中 12% 的人拒绝接种任何疫苗。女性和护士的比例更高。拒绝接受的主要疫苗依次为流感、COVID 和 HPV,主要原因是认为这些疫苗没有必要、不安全或无效。结论 高达三分之一的卫生专业人员或学生有疫苗接种犹豫症,尤其是护理人员,他们是负责接种疫苗的主要群体,根据其他研究,他们在人群疫苗接种犹豫症中的相关性更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Review of vaccine packaging formats and their key features Could molecular farming be a game changing paradigm in the production of immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer immunotherapy? Psychological characteristics and their impact on the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines Comments on “Prevalence of HCV among patients with HIV in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis” Measles eradication: Still a long and winding road
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1