Approaches and Limitations of L2 Textbook Evaluation Research

Thamer Kalfut
{"title":"Approaches and Limitations of L2 Textbook Evaluation Research","authors":"Thamer Kalfut","doi":"10.36892/ijlls.v6i1.1617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evaluation of L2 textbooks is an important aspect of curriculum development in L2 learning and teaching. It has been the subject of research since the 1970s. A large number of studies have been conducted to investigate the language skills, linguistic elements, or/and social factors presented in textbooks. However, even so, the issue of evaluation research approaches has not received very much critical attention. As a result, this research project is concerned with the methodology used in textbook research. It aims to provide an overview of current approaches to L2 textbook evaluation research, as well to highlight their major limitations. It reviews research methods used in previous studies targeting textbooks from grade one to grade twelve in various countries and reveals two main approaches. The first approach seeks to conduct a thorough assessment of one specific English textbook. L2 material researchers often use a Likert scale checklist to investigate the strengths and weaknesses of an entire English language textbook. The second approach evaluates an English textbook from a micro perspective, with a particular emphasis on one single aspect of it, such as reading or writing. These findings may help us to better understand current evaluation approaches used by textbook researchers and their limitations. It shows what needs to be done to improve this evaluation process in the future.","PeriodicalId":506434,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language and Literary Studies","volume":"2 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language and Literary Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v6i1.1617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The evaluation of L2 textbooks is an important aspect of curriculum development in L2 learning and teaching. It has been the subject of research since the 1970s. A large number of studies have been conducted to investigate the language skills, linguistic elements, or/and social factors presented in textbooks. However, even so, the issue of evaluation research approaches has not received very much critical attention. As a result, this research project is concerned with the methodology used in textbook research. It aims to provide an overview of current approaches to L2 textbook evaluation research, as well to highlight their major limitations. It reviews research methods used in previous studies targeting textbooks from grade one to grade twelve in various countries and reveals two main approaches. The first approach seeks to conduct a thorough assessment of one specific English textbook. L2 material researchers often use a Likert scale checklist to investigate the strengths and weaknesses of an entire English language textbook. The second approach evaluates an English textbook from a micro perspective, with a particular emphasis on one single aspect of it, such as reading or writing. These findings may help us to better understand current evaluation approaches used by textbook researchers and their limitations. It shows what needs to be done to improve this evaluation process in the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中级教科书评价研究的方法和局限性
对第二语言教科书的评价是第二语言学习和教学课程开发的一个重要方面。自 20 世纪 70 年代以来,它一直是研究的主题。对教科书中介绍的语言技能、语言要素或/和社会因素进行了大量研究。然而,即便如此,评价研究方法的问题并没有得到太多的关注。因此,本研究项目关注教科书研究中使用的方法。它旨在概述当前的 L2 教科书评价研究方法,并强调其主要局限性。它回顾了以往针对各国一至十二年级教科书的研究中使用的研究方法,并揭示了两种主要方法。第一种方法是对一本特定的英语教科书进行全面评估。第二语言教材研究人员通常使用李克特量表检查表来调查整本英语教科书的优缺点。第二种方法是从微观角度评估英语教材,特别强调其中的一个方面,如阅读或写作。这些发现可以帮助我们更好地理解教科书研究人员目前使用的评价方法及其局限性。它说明了今后需要做些什么来改进这一评价过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Examining the Quality of Arabic Subtitles: A Multi-dimensional Assessment Approach Benefits, Challenges, and Attitudes Toward ChatGPT in English Writing Courses at Saudi Universities An Action Research on the Impact of Podcasts in Grammar Learning of Elementary Students Learner Autonomy, Language Learning Strategies and English Language Proficiency of Filipino Senior High School Students The Ambiguity Commune of The Novel “The Magic Mountain”: Social Class Tensions and Inquiry of Self
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1