Regional compared to general anesthesia for total shoulder arthroplasty

Q4 Medicine Seminars in Arthroplasty Pub Date : 2024-03-04 DOI:10.1053/j.sart.2024.01.013
Nikhil Vallabhaneni BA, Lawrence C. Vanderham MS, PA-C, Skye Jacobson BS, Jacqueline G. Tobin MS, Alexander S. Guareschi BS, Josef K. Eichinger MD, Richard J. Friedman MD, FRCSC
{"title":"Regional compared to general anesthesia for total shoulder arthroplasty","authors":"Nikhil Vallabhaneni BA,&nbsp;Lawrence C. Vanderham MS, PA-C,&nbsp;Skye Jacobson BS,&nbsp;Jacqueline G. Tobin MS,&nbsp;Alexander S. Guareschi BS,&nbsp;Josef K. Eichinger MD,&nbsp;Richard J. Friedman MD, FRCSC","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.01.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a common procedure for numerous shoulder pathologies, including glenohumeral arthritis, rotator cuff tears, and proximal humerus fractures. Prior literature has shown that patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty under regional anesthesia (RA) are at significantly lower risk of postoperative complications and reoperation compared to general anesthesia (GA). The purpose of this study is to compare GA vs. RA in patients undergoing primary elective TSA.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried from 2010 to 2019 to identify all patients who underwent primary elective TSA with the use of GA (n = 24,563) or RA (n = 475). After matching based on age, sex, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification score, 475 matched pairs of patients undergoing TSA using GA or RA were compared. Relevant demographic characteristics and postoperative complication, readmission, and reoperation rates within 30 days of surgery were compared between groups. Operative time and total hospital length of stay (LOS) were also compared. Chi-squared tests were used to compare categorical variables. Continuous variables were compared using independent sample <em>t</em>-test and one-way ANOVA for binomial and multinomial groups, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>RA patients exhibited significantly higher rates of readmission (<em>P</em> &lt; .001) and reoperation (<em>P</em> = .034) compared to GA patients. GA patients showed higher operative times than RA patients when comparing the two cohorts and stratifying patients by body mass index. GA patients also exhibited significantly increased LOS (<em>P</em>=&lt;.001) compared to RA patients. Except for increased readmission and reoperation rates, there was no significant difference in the remaining medical complication rates between the groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>RA patients were found to have higher rates of readmission and reoperation within 30 days of surgery compared to GA patients. GA was associated with longer operative times compared to RA across various body mass index groups. GA was associated with longer LOS compared to RA. However, for all perioperative and short-term postoperative medical complications, patients undergoing TSA under RA had similar rates to GA patients. These findings can be used to guide clinical decision-making when selecting the appropriate anesthetic strategy for patients requiring elective primary TSA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"34 2","pages":"Pages 451-456"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452724000245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a common procedure for numerous shoulder pathologies, including glenohumeral arthritis, rotator cuff tears, and proximal humerus fractures. Prior literature has shown that patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty under regional anesthesia (RA) are at significantly lower risk of postoperative complications and reoperation compared to general anesthesia (GA). The purpose of this study is to compare GA vs. RA in patients undergoing primary elective TSA.

Methods

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried from 2010 to 2019 to identify all patients who underwent primary elective TSA with the use of GA (n = 24,563) or RA (n = 475). After matching based on age, sex, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification score, 475 matched pairs of patients undergoing TSA using GA or RA were compared. Relevant demographic characteristics and postoperative complication, readmission, and reoperation rates within 30 days of surgery were compared between groups. Operative time and total hospital length of stay (LOS) were also compared. Chi-squared tests were used to compare categorical variables. Continuous variables were compared using independent sample t-test and one-way ANOVA for binomial and multinomial groups, respectively.

Results

RA patients exhibited significantly higher rates of readmission (P < .001) and reoperation (P = .034) compared to GA patients. GA patients showed higher operative times than RA patients when comparing the two cohorts and stratifying patients by body mass index. GA patients also exhibited significantly increased LOS (P=<.001) compared to RA patients. Except for increased readmission and reoperation rates, there was no significant difference in the remaining medical complication rates between the groups.

Conclusion

RA patients were found to have higher rates of readmission and reoperation within 30 days of surgery compared to GA patients. GA was associated with longer operative times compared to RA across various body mass index groups. GA was associated with longer LOS compared to RA. However, for all perioperative and short-term postoperative medical complications, patients undergoing TSA under RA had similar rates to GA patients. These findings can be used to guide clinical decision-making when selecting the appropriate anesthetic strategy for patients requiring elective primary TSA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全肩关节置换术中区域麻醉与全身麻醉的比较
背景全肩关节置换术(TSA)是治疗多种肩部病症的常见手术,包括盂肱关节炎、肩袖撕裂和肱骨近端骨折。先前的文献显示,与全身麻醉(GA)相比,在区域麻醉(RA)下接受全髋关节和膝关节置换术的患者术后并发症和再次手术的风险要低得多。本研究的目的是对接受初级择期TSA手术的患者进行GA与RA的比较。方法查询了2010年至2019年的国家外科质量改进计划数据库,以确定所有接受初级择期TSA手术并使用GA(n = 24,563)或RA(n = 475)的患者。根据年龄、性别和美国麻醉医师协会分类评分进行匹配后,对 475 对使用 GA 或 RA 进行 TSA 的匹配患者进行了比较。比较了两组患者的相关人口统计学特征、术后并发症发生率、再入院率以及术后 30 天内的再次手术率。同时还比较了手术时间和总住院时间(LOS)。采用卡方检验比较分类变量。连续变量分别采用独立样本 t 检验和单因素方差分析对二项组和多项组进行比较。结果与 GA 患者相比,RA 患者的再入院率(P < .001)和再手术率(P = .034)明显更高。将两组患者进行比较并按体重指数进行分层后,GA 患者的手术时间高于 RA 患者。与 RA 患者相比,GA 患者的 LOS 也明显增加(P=0.001)。除了再入院率和再手术率增加外,两组患者在其余医疗并发症发生率方面没有明显差异。在不同体重指数组别中,GA 的手术时间比 RA 长。与 RA 相比,GA 与更长的 LOS 相关。然而,就所有围手术期和术后短期医疗并发症而言,在RA条件下接受TSA手术的患者与GA患者的并发症发生率相似。这些研究结果可用于指导临床决策,为需要进行选择性初级 TSA 的患者选择合适的麻醉策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Arthroplasty
Seminars in Arthroplasty Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
期刊介绍: Each issue of Seminars in Arthroplasty provides a comprehensive, current overview of a single topic in arthroplasty. The journal addresses orthopedic surgeons, providing authoritative reviews with emphasis on new developments relevant to their practice.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Comparing comorbidity burden between patients undergoing ambulatory rotator cuff repair vs. inpatient anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty Reaching MCID, SCB, and PASS for ASES, SANE, SST, and VAS following shoulder arthroplasty does not correlate with patient satisfaction Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty using hybrid glenoid fixation with a porous-coated titanium post. Two- to ten-year follow-up of 256 cases with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1