Influence of access cavity design on root canal instrumentation efficacy in molars – An in vitro study

Vedamani Chandolu, Jyothi Mandava, Roopesh Borugadda, K. Sirisha, Konagala Ravi Kumar, Sameera Goteti, Lalitha Sri Roja Nallamilli
{"title":"Influence of access cavity design on root canal instrumentation efficacy in molars – An in vitro study","authors":"Vedamani Chandolu, Jyothi Mandava, Roopesh Borugadda, K. Sirisha, Konagala Ravi Kumar, Sameera Goteti, Lalitha Sri Roja Nallamilli","doi":"10.4103/jcde.jcde_272_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Several designs of access cavity have been evolved in the recent past with the concept of minimal tooth tissue removal which would improve the root canal treated teeth fracture resistance.\n \n \n \n To investigate the effect of conservative design access cavity during the instrumentation of maxillary molar root canals.\n \n \n \n Eighty noncarious maxillary molars were assigned to the traditional and conservative access groups (n = 40 each). After designated access preparations, the teeth were immersed in Lugols’s solution for staining the pulp tissue. Root canal instrumentation was performed with TruNatomy file system. Pre- and postinstrumentation nano-computed tomography (CT) images were taken and reconstructed using CT-An software. Root canals volumetric analysis was done with CT-Vol software. The analysis of the data was dealt with Shapiro–Wilk test and independent t-test.\n \n \n \n The volume of pulp canal space before and after instrumentation changed significantly between the traditional and conservative access design groups, according to an independent t-test. In comparison, the mean volume of dentin removed was much larger in the TAC group (P = 0.0016). The independent t-test manifests difference significantly between traditional endodontic access cavity (TAC) and conservative access cavity (CAC) with percentage of unprepared canal walls. The mean percentage of unprepared area was significantly lesser in TAC group as compared to CAC group (P = 0.0022).\n \n \n \n The volume of dentin removed was greater in TAC than with the CAC design. The amount of untouched canal wall area was significantly higher in conservative access design than with the traditional access design group.\n","PeriodicalId":516572,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics","volume":"114 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcde.jcde_272_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several designs of access cavity have been evolved in the recent past with the concept of minimal tooth tissue removal which would improve the root canal treated teeth fracture resistance. To investigate the effect of conservative design access cavity during the instrumentation of maxillary molar root canals. Eighty noncarious maxillary molars were assigned to the traditional and conservative access groups (n = 40 each). After designated access preparations, the teeth were immersed in Lugols’s solution for staining the pulp tissue. Root canal instrumentation was performed with TruNatomy file system. Pre- and postinstrumentation nano-computed tomography (CT) images were taken and reconstructed using CT-An software. Root canals volumetric analysis was done with CT-Vol software. The analysis of the data was dealt with Shapiro–Wilk test and independent t-test. The volume of pulp canal space before and after instrumentation changed significantly between the traditional and conservative access design groups, according to an independent t-test. In comparison, the mean volume of dentin removed was much larger in the TAC group (P = 0.0016). The independent t-test manifests difference significantly between traditional endodontic access cavity (TAC) and conservative access cavity (CAC) with percentage of unprepared canal walls. The mean percentage of unprepared area was significantly lesser in TAC group as compared to CAC group (P = 0.0022). The volume of dentin removed was greater in TAC than with the CAC design. The amount of untouched canal wall area was significantly higher in conservative access design than with the traditional access design group.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接入腔设计对磨牙根管器械疗效的影响 - 体外研究
近来,有几种通路洞的设计理念是尽量少去除牙体组织,从而提高根管治疗后牙齿的抗折能力。 为了研究在上颌磨牙根管器械治疗过程中,保守设计通路洞的效果。 将 80 颗无龋的上颌磨牙分为传统和保守通路组(各 40 颗)。在完成指定的通路准备后,将牙齿浸入卢戈尔斯溶液中对牙髓组织进行染色。使用 TruNatomy 锉系统进行根管器械操作。使用 CT-An 软件拍摄并重建器械前和器械后的纳米计算机断层扫描(CT)图像。根管体积分析使用 CT-Vol 软件完成。数据分析采用 Shapiro-Wilk 检验和独立 t 检验。 根据独立 t 检验,传统和保守通路设计组在器械操作前后的牙髓腔体积有明显变化。相比之下,TAC 组去除的平均牙本质体积要大得多(P = 0.0016)。独立 t 检验显示,传统根管治疗通路洞(TAC)和保守治疗通路洞(CAC)在未修整的管壁百分比上存在显著差异。与 CAC 组相比,TAC 组未修补区域的平均百分比明显较低(P = 0.0022)。 TAC 设计去除的牙本质量大于 CAC 设计。保守通路设计组的未修整管壁面积明显高于传统通路设计组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative evaluation of incorporation of ferrule in premolars endocrown designs to check any alterations in their fracture resistance: A pilot study Effect of blood and artificial saliva contamination on marginal adaptation and sealing ability of different retrograde filling materials: A comparative analysis Enriched advanced platelet-rich fibrin plus gold nanoparticles against Enterococcus faecalis for its potential use in revascularization for necrotic immature permanent teeth Does increase in temperature of sodium hypochlorite have enhanced antimicrobial efficacy and tissue dissolution property? – A systematic review and meta-regression An in vitro comparative evaluation of efficiency of three rotary nickel–titanium file systems in terms of remaining dentin thickness using cone-beam computed tomography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1