Prospective external validation of the FluScore risk score for influenza in outpatients.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Family practice Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1093/fampra/cmae014
Mark H Ebell, Ariella Dale, Dan J Merenstein, Bruce Barrett, Cassie Hulme, Sarah Walters, Alea Sabry, Michelle Bentivegna
{"title":"Prospective external validation of the FluScore risk score for influenza in outpatients.","authors":"Mark H Ebell, Ariella Dale, Dan J Merenstein, Bruce Barrett, Cassie Hulme, Sarah Walters, Alea Sabry, Michelle Bentivegna","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmae014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Testing for influenza in patients with acute lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) is common and in some cases is performed for all patients with LRTI. A more selective approach to testing could be more efficient.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from two prospective studies in the US primary and urgent care settings that enrolled patients with acute LRTI or influenza-like illness. Data were collected in the 2016, 2019, 2021, and 2022 flu seasons. All patients underwent polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for influenza and the FluScore was calculated based on patient-reported symptoms at their initial visit. The probability of influenza in each risk group was reported, as well as stratum-specific likelihood ratios (SSLRs) for each risk level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of influenza within risk groups varied based on overall differences in flu seasons and populations. However, the FluScore exhibited consistent performance across various seasons and populations based on the SSLRs. The FluScore had a consistent SSLR range of 0.20 to 0.23 for the low-risk group, 0.63 to 0.99 for the moderate-risk group, and 1.46 to 1.67 for the high-risk group. The diagnostic odds ratio based on the midpoints of these ranges was 7.25.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FluScore could streamline patient categorization, identifying patients who could be exempted from testing, while identifying candidates for rapid influenza tests. This has the potential to be more efficient than a \"one size fits all\" test strategy, as it strategically targets the use of tests on patients most likely to benefit. It is potentially usable in a telehealth setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":" ","pages":"207-211"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmae014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Testing for influenza in patients with acute lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) is common and in some cases is performed for all patients with LRTI. A more selective approach to testing could be more efficient.

Methods: We used data from two prospective studies in the US primary and urgent care settings that enrolled patients with acute LRTI or influenza-like illness. Data were collected in the 2016, 2019, 2021, and 2022 flu seasons. All patients underwent polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for influenza and the FluScore was calculated based on patient-reported symptoms at their initial visit. The probability of influenza in each risk group was reported, as well as stratum-specific likelihood ratios (SSLRs) for each risk level.

Results: The prevalence of influenza within risk groups varied based on overall differences in flu seasons and populations. However, the FluScore exhibited consistent performance across various seasons and populations based on the SSLRs. The FluScore had a consistent SSLR range of 0.20 to 0.23 for the low-risk group, 0.63 to 0.99 for the moderate-risk group, and 1.46 to 1.67 for the high-risk group. The diagnostic odds ratio based on the midpoints of these ranges was 7.25.

Conclusions: The FluScore could streamline patient categorization, identifying patients who could be exempted from testing, while identifying candidates for rapid influenza tests. This has the potential to be more efficient than a "one size fits all" test strategy, as it strategically targets the use of tests on patients most likely to benefit. It is potentially usable in a telehealth setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对门诊患者流感风险评分 FluScore 进行前瞻性外部验证。
背景:对急性下呼吸道感染(LRTI)患者进行流感检测很常见,在某些情况下,对所有 LRTI 患者都进行检测。更有选择性的检测方法可能更有效:我们使用了两项前瞻性研究的数据,这两项研究都是在美国基层医疗机构和紧急医疗机构进行的,共招募了急性下呼吸道感染(LRTI)或流感样疾病患者。数据收集于 2016、2019、2021 和 2022 年流感季节。所有患者都接受了聚合酶链反应(PCR)流感检测,并根据患者首次就诊时报告的症状计算出流感评分。报告了每个风险组的流感概率以及每个风险等级的分层可能性比(SSLRs):结果:根据流感季节和人群的总体差异,各风险组的流感流行率有所不同。然而,根据 SSLRs,FluScore 在不同季节和人群中表现出一致的性能。流感评分的 SSLR 范围一致:低风险组为 0.20 至 0.23,中风险组为 0.63 至 0.99,高风险组为 1.46 至 1.67。根据这些范围的中点得出的诊断几率比为 7.25:流感评分可简化患者分类,确定可免于检测的患者,同时确定快速流感检测的候选者。这有可能比 "一刀切 "的检测策略更有效,因为它能战略性地将检测用于最有可能受益的患者。它有可能在远程保健环境中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Antibiotic treatment for acute sinusitis and subsequent health care use and work absence: a nationwide registry study from Norway. Exploring determinants of patient attitudes toward telemedicine in primary care: a cross-sectional study in Türkiye. Bio-psycho-social situations suitable for the use of teleconsultation in general practice: a doctor-patient mirror study. Security and privacy in e-health technologies: a scoping review of challenges and strategies in primary care. Can the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) be used to predict liver fibrosis risk instead of the fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4)?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1