How are we handling protein drugs in hospitals? A human factors and systems engineering approach to compare two hospitals and suggest a best practice.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal for Quality in Health Care Pub Date : 2024-03-18 DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzae020
Clàudia Sabaté-Martínez, Mattias Paulsson, Silvia González-Suárez, Ulla Elofsson, Anna Millqvist Fureby, Marie Wahlgren, Carmen López-Cabezas
{"title":"How are we handling protein drugs in hospitals? A human factors and systems engineering approach to compare two hospitals and suggest a best practice.","authors":"Clàudia Sabaté-Martínez, Mattias Paulsson, Silvia González-Suárez, Ulla Elofsson, Anna Millqvist Fureby, Marie Wahlgren, Carmen López-Cabezas","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzae020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biopharmaceuticals are complex biological molecules that require careful storage and handling to ensure medication integrity. In this study, a work system analysis of real-world protein drug (PD) handling was performed with the following goals: identify main barriers and facilitators for successful adherence to accepted recommendations in PD handling, analyse differences in two organizations, and define a Best Current Practice in the real-life handling of PDs based on the results of the work system analysis. Observational study was held in two university hospitals in Spain and Sweden. Based on the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model, the tools chosen were: the PETT scan, in order to indicate the presence of barriers or facilitators for the PETT components (People, Environment, Tools, Tasks); the Tasks and tools matrices to construct a checklist to record direct observations during the real-life handling of biopharmaceuticals, and the Journey map to depict the work process. Observations were performed between March and November 2022. Each episode of direct observation included a single protein drug in some point of the supply chain and considered all the elements in the work system. Based on the results of the work system analysis and the literature review, the authors propose a list of items which could be assumed as Best Current Practice for PDs handling in hospitals. There were a total of 34 observations involving 19 PDs. Regarding People involved in the work process, there was a diversity of professionals with different previous training and knowledge, leading to an information gap. With respect to Environment, some structural and organizational differences between hospitals lead to risks related to the time exposure of PDs to room temperature and mechanical stress. Some differences also existed in the Tools and Tasks involved in the process, being especially relevant to the lack of compatibility information of PDs with new technologies, such as pneumatic tube system, robotic reconstitution, or closed-system transfer devices. Finally, 15 suggestions for best current practice are proposed. Main barriers found for compliance with accepted recommendations were related to the information gap detected in professionals involved in the handling of protein drugs, unmonitored temperature, and the lack of compatibility information of protein drugs with some new technologies. By applying a Human Factors and Systems Engineering Approach, the comparison of two European hospitals has led to a suggested list of Best Current Practices in the handling of protein drugs in a hospital.</p>","PeriodicalId":13800,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11002458/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzae020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biopharmaceuticals are complex biological molecules that require careful storage and handling to ensure medication integrity. In this study, a work system analysis of real-world protein drug (PD) handling was performed with the following goals: identify main barriers and facilitators for successful adherence to accepted recommendations in PD handling, analyse differences in two organizations, and define a Best Current Practice in the real-life handling of PDs based on the results of the work system analysis. Observational study was held in two university hospitals in Spain and Sweden. Based on the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model, the tools chosen were: the PETT scan, in order to indicate the presence of barriers or facilitators for the PETT components (People, Environment, Tools, Tasks); the Tasks and tools matrices to construct a checklist to record direct observations during the real-life handling of biopharmaceuticals, and the Journey map to depict the work process. Observations were performed between March and November 2022. Each episode of direct observation included a single protein drug in some point of the supply chain and considered all the elements in the work system. Based on the results of the work system analysis and the literature review, the authors propose a list of items which could be assumed as Best Current Practice for PDs handling in hospitals. There were a total of 34 observations involving 19 PDs. Regarding People involved in the work process, there was a diversity of professionals with different previous training and knowledge, leading to an information gap. With respect to Environment, some structural and organizational differences between hospitals lead to risks related to the time exposure of PDs to room temperature and mechanical stress. Some differences also existed in the Tools and Tasks involved in the process, being especially relevant to the lack of compatibility information of PDs with new technologies, such as pneumatic tube system, robotic reconstitution, or closed-system transfer devices. Finally, 15 suggestions for best current practice are proposed. Main barriers found for compliance with accepted recommendations were related to the information gap detected in professionals involved in the handling of protein drugs, unmonitored temperature, and the lack of compatibility information of protein drugs with some new technologies. By applying a Human Factors and Systems Engineering Approach, the comparison of two European hospitals has led to a suggested list of Best Current Practices in the handling of protein drugs in a hospital.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们如何在医院处理蛋白质药物?采用人为因素和系统工程方法对两家医院进行比较,并提出最佳实践建议。
背景:生物制药是复杂的生物分子,需要小心储存和处理以确保药物的完整性。本研究对现实世界中蛋白质药物(PD)的处理进行了工作系统分析,目的如下:确定成功遵守蛋白质药物处理公认建议的主要障碍和促进因素,分析两家机构的差异,并根据工作系统分析的结果确定现实生活中蛋白质药物处理的最佳现行做法:方法:在西班牙和瑞典的两所大学医院进行观察研究。根据患者安全系统工程倡议(SEIPS)模型,选择的工具包括:PETT 扫描,以显示 PETT 组成部分(人员、环境、工具、任务)是否存在障碍或促进因素;任务和工具矩阵,以构建一个检查表,记录在实际处理生物制药过程中的直接观察结果;旅程地图,以描述工作流程。每次直接观察都包括供应链中某个环节的一种蛋白质药物,并考虑了工作系统中的所有要素。根据工作系统分析结果和文献综述,作者提出了一份可被视为医院处理蛋白药物最佳现行做法的项目清单:共进行了 34 次观察,涉及 19 个病区。在工作过程中涉及的人员方面,专业人员各不相同,他们以前接受过不同的培训,拥有不同的知识,这导致了信息差距。在环境方面,各家医院在结构和组织方面存在一些差异,这就导致了设备在室温和机械压力下暴露时间长短的风险。流程中涉及的工具和任务也存在一些差异,尤其是缺乏 PD 与新技术的兼容性信息,如气动管系统、机器人重组或封闭系统转移装置。最后,提出了 15 项当前最佳实践建议:结论:在遵守已接受的建议方面发现的主要障碍与参与处理蛋白质药物的专业人员的信息缺口、未监控的温度以及缺乏蛋白质药物与某些新技术的兼容性信息有关。通过采用人为因素和系统工程方法,对两家欧洲医院进行比较,提出了医院处理蛋白质药物的当前最佳实践建议清单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.80%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Quality in Health Care makes activities and research related to quality and safety in health care available to a worldwide readership. The Journal publishes papers in all disciplines related to the quality and safety of health care, including health services research, health care evaluation, technology assessment, health economics, utilization review, cost containment, and nursing care research, as well as clinical research related to quality of care. This peer-reviewed journal is truly interdisciplinary and includes contributions from representatives of all health professions such as doctors, nurses, quality assurance professionals, managers, politicians, social workers, and therapists, as well as researchers from health-related backgrounds.
期刊最新文献
Underreporting of adverse events to health authorities by healthcare professionals: a red flag-raising descriptive study. Addressing the Continuing Challenges of Developing and Implementing Clinical Practice Guidelines. Diagnostic performance of a newly launched Canadian fast-track ultrasound clinic by rheumatologists for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. Exploring the Development of Safety Culture among Physicians with Text Mining of Patient Safety Reports: A Retrospective Study. Optimizing Neurosurgery Clinic Operations: A Comparative Study of Interventions in Finland's Public Healthcare System.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1