首页 > 最新文献

International Journal for Quality in Health Care最新文献

英文 中文
Continuous glucose monitoring in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of barriers and opportunities for care improvement. 2型糖尿病的持续血糖监测:改善护理的障碍和机会的系统回顾。
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-07-04 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaf046
Maria Assunta Barchiesi, Armando Calabrese, Roberta Costa, Francesca Di Pillo, Antonio D'Uffizi, Luigi Tiburzi, Erum Zahid

Background: Diabetes mellitus, particularly type 2 diabetes (T2DM), is a chronic disease associated with serious complications, such as heart disease, kidney failure, and blindness. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems have emerged as a more effective alternative to traditional fingerstick testing, offering patients greater control over their condition. Despite their potential benefits, several barriers to CGM sensor use persist, limiting their widespread adoption among patients with T2DM. This review explores the barriers to CGM sensor use, particularly from the patient's perspective.

Methods: A systematic literature review is conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The search focuses on studies published between January 2018 and June 2024 and is performed in two primary databases, PubMed and Scopus, selected for their relevance to T2DM research. Studies are included if they explore challenges and barriers to CGM adoption, report patient perspectives, or provide insights into the usability and accessibility of technology. The data are analyzed using deductive content analysis, applying Wilson et al.'s thematic categories as a predefined framework to systematically classify and interpret barriers to CGM adoption. This approach ensures methodological consistency and alignment with existing research on eHealth adoption challenges.

Results: The review identifies several key barriers to CGM sensor use despite the benefits, such as improved glucose control and reduced hypoglycemic events. Major challenges include the high cost of sensors, wearability issues, discomfort from adhesive materials, and concerns about the visibility of the sensors. Additionally, patients report difficulties in interpreting the large volumes of data generated by CGM systems, as well as discomfort or fear related to sensor insertion. Lack of technological support, low health literacy, and insufficient social support are also identified as factors contributing to non-adoption.

Conclusions: Policymakers and healthcare providers are encouraged to address these barriers by developing patient-centered strategies that support the adoption of CGM sensors. Successfully overcoming these challenges can further support integrating CGM sensors with the Chronic Care Model and Automated Insulin Delivery systems. As an implication, this integration has the potential to enhance glycemic control and improve patient quality of life in the management of T2DM. Furthermore, addressing these barriers may drive advancements in sensor design, improve accessibility, and minimize the environmental impact of CGM sensor use.

背景:糖尿病,尤其是2型糖尿病(T2DM),是一种伴有严重并发症的慢性疾病,如心脏病、肾衰竭和失明。连续血糖监测(CGM)系统已经成为传统手指测试的更有效的替代方案,为患者提供更好的病情控制。尽管CGM传感器具有潜在的益处,但仍存在一些障碍,限制了其在T2DM患者中的广泛应用。这篇综述探讨了使用CGM传感器的障碍,特别是从患者的角度。方法:根据PRISMA指南进行系统的文献综述。检索重点是2018年1月至2024年6月之间发表的研究,并在两个主要数据库PubMed和Scopus中进行,选择它们与2型糖尿病研究相关。如果研究探讨了采用CGM的挑战和障碍,报告了患者的观点,或提供了对技术可用性和可访问性的见解,则将其纳入研究。使用演绎内容分析对数据进行分析,将Wilson等人的主题类别作为预定义框架,系统地分类和解释采用CGM的障碍。这种方法确保了方法的一致性,并与现有的关于电子健康采用挑战的研究保持一致。结果:该综述确定了使用CGM传感器的几个关键障碍,尽管有好处,如改善血糖控制和减少低血糖事件。主要挑战包括传感器的高成本、可穿戴性问题、粘附材料的不适以及对传感器可见性的担忧。此外,患者报告难以解释由cgm产生的大量数据,以及与传感器插入相关的不适或恐惧。缺乏技术支持、卫生知识普及程度低和社会支持不足也被认为是导致不收养的因素。结论:鼓励决策者和医疗保健提供者通过制定支持采用CGM传感器的以患者为中心的战略来解决这些障碍。成功克服这些挑战可以进一步支持将CGM传感器与慢性护理模型(CCM)和自动胰岛素输送(AID)系统集成。这意味着,这种整合有可能在2型糖尿病的管理中加强血糖控制和改善患者的生活质量。此外,解决这些障碍可能会推动传感器设计的进步,提高可达性,并最大限度地减少CGM传感器使用对环境的影响。
{"title":"Continuous glucose monitoring in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of barriers and opportunities for care improvement.","authors":"Maria Assunta Barchiesi, Armando Calabrese, Roberta Costa, Francesca Di Pillo, Antonio D'Uffizi, Luigi Tiburzi, Erum Zahid","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf046","DOIUrl":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf046","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes mellitus, particularly type 2 diabetes (T2DM), is a chronic disease associated with serious complications, such as heart disease, kidney failure, and blindness. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems have emerged as a more effective alternative to traditional fingerstick testing, offering patients greater control over their condition. Despite their potential benefits, several barriers to CGM sensor use persist, limiting their widespread adoption among patients with T2DM. This review explores the barriers to CGM sensor use, particularly from the patient's perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review is conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The search focuses on studies published between January 2018 and June 2024 and is performed in two primary databases, PubMed and Scopus, selected for their relevance to T2DM research. Studies are included if they explore challenges and barriers to CGM adoption, report patient perspectives, or provide insights into the usability and accessibility of technology. The data are analyzed using deductive content analysis, applying Wilson et al.'s thematic categories as a predefined framework to systematically classify and interpret barriers to CGM adoption. This approach ensures methodological consistency and alignment with existing research on eHealth adoption challenges.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review identifies several key barriers to CGM sensor use despite the benefits, such as improved glucose control and reduced hypoglycemic events. Major challenges include the high cost of sensors, wearability issues, discomfort from adhesive materials, and concerns about the visibility of the sensors. Additionally, patients report difficulties in interpreting the large volumes of data generated by CGM systems, as well as discomfort or fear related to sensor insertion. Lack of technological support, low health literacy, and insufficient social support are also identified as factors contributing to non-adoption.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Policymakers and healthcare providers are encouraged to address these barriers by developing patient-centered strategies that support the adoption of CGM sensors. Successfully overcoming these challenges can further support integrating CGM sensors with the Chronic Care Model and Automated Insulin Delivery systems. As an implication, this integration has the potential to enhance glycemic control and improve patient quality of life in the management of T2DM. Furthermore, addressing these barriers may drive advancements in sensor design, improve accessibility, and minimize the environmental impact of CGM sensor use.</p>","PeriodicalId":13800,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12249211/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143985279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association between patient experience and medical dispute costs. 患者体验与医疗纠纷费用的关系。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-07-04 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaf047
Do Hee Kim, Jun Young Park, Jun Su Park, Ah-Ram Sul, Tae Hyun Kim

Background: Patient experience is increasingly being recognized as a core component of quality healthcare. It captures various dimensions of a patient's interaction with healthcare providers that may influence patient satisfaction and ultimately impact the incidence of complaints or disputes. However, only limited research has investigated the financial implications of patient experience, particularly its association with medical dispute costs. This study sought to understand whether patient experience scores correlate with medical dispute costs and to provide insights into cost-effective strategies in patient-centred care.

Methods: We used a dataset that included patient experience scores and medical dispute costs over a defined period. Descriptive analysis, frequency distribution of disputes, and odds ratios were calculated to examine the initial patterns. Logistic regression models were applied using both logged and ratio-based dispute-cost transformations to assess the relationship between patient experience and dispute costs. The models were stratified according to patient experience type.

Results: The analysis revealed that higher patient experience scores were generally associated with reduced medical dispute costs, with significant relationships observed in specific models. In a cost-ratio model, doctor interactions showed a strong correlation with reduced dispute costs. For nurses, significant associations were observed in a logged cost model, suggesting that both nurses and doctors contributed uniquely to dispute costs.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that improving specific domains of patient experience, such as patient rights, may serve as a cost-effective strategy for reducing medical dispute costs. These findings emphasize the importance of fostering patient-centred care and addressing institutional and contextual factors. These insights provide a foundation for targeted strategies to enhance patient satisfaction while promoting financial and operational stability in healthcare institutions.

背景:患者体验越来越被认为是高质量医疗保健的核心组成部分。它捕获了患者与医疗保健提供者互动的各个方面,这些方面可能会影响患者满意度,并最终影响投诉或纠纷的发生率。然而,只有有限的研究调查了病人经历的财务影响,特别是其与医疗纠纷费用的关系。本研究旨在了解患者体验评分是否与医疗纠纷成本相关,并为以患者为中心的护理的成本效益策略提供见解。方法:我们使用了一个数据集,包括患者体验评分和医疗纠纷成本在一个确定的时期。描述性分析、纠纷的频率分布和比值比被计算来检验初始模式。使用记录和基于比率的纠纷成本转换应用逻辑回归模型来评估患者经验和纠纷成本之间的关系。根据患者经历类型对模型进行分层。结果:分析显示,较高的患者体验分数通常与降低医疗纠纷成本相关,在特定模型中观察到显著的关系。在成本比模型中,医生互动与降低纠纷成本有很强的相关性。对于护士来说,在记录成本模型中观察到显著的关联,这表明护士和医生都对争议成本做出了独特的贡献。结论:本研究表明,改善患者体验的特定领域,如患者权利,可以作为降低医疗纠纷成本的成本效益策略。这些发现强调了促进以患者为中心的护理和解决制度和环境因素的重要性。这些见解为有针对性的策略提供了基础,以提高患者满意度,同时促进医疗保健机构的财务和运营稳定性。
{"title":"Association between patient experience and medical dispute costs.","authors":"Do Hee Kim, Jun Young Park, Jun Su Park, Ah-Ram Sul, Tae Hyun Kim","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf047","DOIUrl":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf047","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient experience is increasingly being recognized as a core component of quality healthcare. It captures various dimensions of a patient's interaction with healthcare providers that may influence patient satisfaction and ultimately impact the incidence of complaints or disputes. However, only limited research has investigated the financial implications of patient experience, particularly its association with medical dispute costs. This study sought to understand whether patient experience scores correlate with medical dispute costs and to provide insights into cost-effective strategies in patient-centred care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a dataset that included patient experience scores and medical dispute costs over a defined period. Descriptive analysis, frequency distribution of disputes, and odds ratios were calculated to examine the initial patterns. Logistic regression models were applied using both logged and ratio-based dispute-cost transformations to assess the relationship between patient experience and dispute costs. The models were stratified according to patient experience type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed that higher patient experience scores were generally associated with reduced medical dispute costs, with significant relationships observed in specific models. In a cost-ratio model, doctor interactions showed a strong correlation with reduced dispute costs. For nurses, significant associations were observed in a logged cost model, suggesting that both nurses and doctors contributed uniquely to dispute costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that improving specific domains of patient experience, such as patient rights, may serve as a cost-effective strategy for reducing medical dispute costs. These findings emphasize the importance of fostering patient-centred care and addressing institutional and contextual factors. These insights provide a foundation for targeted strategies to enhance patient satisfaction while promoting financial and operational stability in healthcare institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":13800,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144015170","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparing continuity of care before and after disability registration: a retrospective cohort study. 比较残疾登记前后护理的连续性:一项回顾性队列研究。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-07-04 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaf045
Zhaoyan Piao, Heekyoung Choi, Boyoung Jeon, Euna Han

Background: Persons with disabilities often encounter barriers in accessing healthcare services. However, research on the impact of disability on the continuity of care (COC) remains limited. We assessed the changes in COC among disabled individuals to monitor alterations in their healthcare accessibility.

Methods: This study used the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort 2.0 DB. The Bice-Boxerman COC Index (COCI; 0-1 range; higher values indicate greater COC) was used, with disability status of the participants determined from the registered data. Propensity-score matching was conducted for the control group. Difference-in-difference analysis was conducted to evaluate pre- and post-disability changes in COC for people with disabilities relative to those without.

Results: COCI values were analyzed for 9702 participants with disabilities and 19 404 control individuals. On average, the disability group scored 0.0343 lower than the control group 1 year before disability registration (P = .001) relative to the disability registration year. Similar results were obtained for the physical disability, visual disability, and hearing disability subgroups, with scores of -0.0342, -0.0394, and -0.0285, respectively (P < .0001 for all groups). On the other hand, the neurological disability subgroup showed a marginal change in the COCI score, peaking 2 years before disability registration (-0.0757, P < .0001).

Conclusion: Individuals with physical, visual, and hearing disabilities showed low COCI scores, with a significant decline occurring 1 year before disability registration. In contrast, the control group showed no change in COC. This result highlights the need to improve healthcare continuity, particularly for individuals with the respective disabilities.

背景:残疾人在获得保健服务方面经常遇到障碍。然而,关于残疾对护理连续性(COC)影响的研究仍然有限。我们评估了残疾人COC的变化,以监测其医疗可及性的变化。方法:本研究采用国家健康保险服务-国家样本队列2.0 DB。Bice-Boxerman COC指数(COCI;0 - 1范围;数值越高,表明COC越高),参与者的残疾状态从登记的数据中确定。对照组进行倾向-得分匹配。采用差异中差异分析来评估残疾前后COC相对于非残疾者的变化。结果:分析了9702名残疾参与者和19404名对照个体的COCI值。残障组在残障登记前1年的平均得分较对照组低0.0343分(p = 0.001)。在身体残疾、视觉残疾和听力残疾亚组中也得到了类似的结果,得分分别为- 0.0342、-0.0394和-0.0285(所有组p < 0.0001)。另一方面,神经功能障碍亚组的COCI评分变化不大,在残疾登记前两年达到峰值(-0.0757,p < 0.0001)。结论:身体、视觉和听力残疾的个体COCI得分较低,在残疾登记前一年显著下降。相比之下,对照组的COC没有变化。这一结果突出表明,需要提高医疗保健的连续性,特别是对各自残疾的个人。
{"title":"Comparing continuity of care before and after disability registration: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Zhaoyan Piao, Heekyoung Choi, Boyoung Jeon, Euna Han","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf045","DOIUrl":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf045","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persons with disabilities often encounter barriers in accessing healthcare services. However, research on the impact of disability on the continuity of care (COC) remains limited. We assessed the changes in COC among disabled individuals to monitor alterations in their healthcare accessibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort 2.0 DB. The Bice-Boxerman COC Index (COCI; 0-1 range; higher values indicate greater COC) was used, with disability status of the participants determined from the registered data. Propensity-score matching was conducted for the control group. Difference-in-difference analysis was conducted to evaluate pre- and post-disability changes in COC for people with disabilities relative to those without.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>COCI values were analyzed for 9702 participants with disabilities and 19 404 control individuals. On average, the disability group scored 0.0343 lower than the control group 1 year before disability registration (P = .001) relative to the disability registration year. Similar results were obtained for the physical disability, visual disability, and hearing disability subgroups, with scores of -0.0342, -0.0394, and -0.0285, respectively (P < .0001 for all groups). On the other hand, the neurological disability subgroup showed a marginal change in the COCI score, peaking 2 years before disability registration (-0.0757, P < .0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individuals with physical, visual, and hearing disabilities showed low COCI scores, with a significant decline occurring 1 year before disability registration. In contrast, the control group showed no change in COC. This result highlights the need to improve healthcare continuity, particularly for individuals with the respective disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":13800,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143992111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Quality of care for newly diagnosed patients with rheumatoid arthritis in South Korea: a nationwide cohort study. 韩国新诊断的类风湿关节炎患者的护理质量:一项全国性队列研究
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-07-04 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaf044
Jun Won Park, Min Jung Kim, Young Kyung Do, Shin-Seok Lee, Kichul Shin

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the quality of care in newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients by analyzing conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) treatment patterns and healthcare utilization using a nationwide claims database.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment database. Study subjects were those who were newly diagnosed with RA (ICD-10 code M05, M06) and were prescribed a cDMARD in 2014, with follow-up until 2018. Demographic and clinical information, the level of healthcare (LOH) facilities at which the first prescription claim was made, and subsequent healthcare service utilization were collected. We also analyzed the initial pattern in cDMARD prescription and its retention rate.

Results: A total of 21 136 patients were analyzed. Diagnosis of seronegative RA (n = 14 571, 68.9%) was more common than seropositive RA. Seropositive RA was most often discovered in tertiary general hospitals (n = 2230, 34.0%), whereas seronegative RA was most diagnosed in primary care clinics (n = 7539, 51.7%) (P  <  .001). The most prescribed initial cDMARD was hydroxychloroquine as monotherapy (n = 9867, 46.7%). However, methotrexate, a well-established first-line cDMARD, was prescribed in 5447 (25.8%) patients. The discontinuation rate of cDMARD was higher in seronegative than seropositive patients (65.3% vs. 90.3%) and in patients first diagnosed in community LOH (P for trend < .001). The mean number of visits to any outpatient clinics (35/year) was substantially higher than that of the general population. Yet, the number of outpatient visits for RA management was only 2.8/year.

Conclusion: The quality of care for newly diagnosed RA patients in South Korea can be improved. Further education on accurate diagnosis and effective treatment is necessary to improve the quality of care provided by other specialists and general practitioners.

背景:本研究旨在通过使用全国索赔数据库分析常规疾病改善抗风湿药物(cDMARDs)治疗模式和医疗保健利用情况,评估新诊断RA患者的护理质量。方法:采用韩国健康保险审查与评估数据库进行回顾性队列研究。研究对象是新诊断为RA的患者(ICD-10代码M05, M06),并于2014年开了cDMARD,随访至2018年。收集了人口统计和临床信息、首次开具处方索赔的医疗设施水平以及随后的医疗服务利用情况。我们还分析了cDMARD处方的初始模式及其保留率。结果:共分析21,136例患者。血清阴性RA(14571例,68.9%)较血清阳性RA多见。血清阳性RA多见于三级综合医院(n = 2230, 34.0%),血清阴性RA多见于初级保健诊所(n = 7539, 51.7%) (P结论:韩国新诊断RA患者的护理质量有待提高。进一步教育准确诊断和有效治疗是必要的,以提高其他专家和全科医生提供的护理质量。
{"title":"Quality of care for newly diagnosed patients with rheumatoid arthritis in South Korea: a nationwide cohort study.","authors":"Jun Won Park, Min Jung Kim, Young Kyung Do, Shin-Seok Lee, Kichul Shin","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf044","DOIUrl":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf044","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the quality of care in newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients by analyzing conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) treatment patterns and healthcare utilization using a nationwide claims database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment database. Study subjects were those who were newly diagnosed with RA (ICD-10 code M05, M06) and were prescribed a cDMARD in 2014, with follow-up until 2018. Demographic and clinical information, the level of healthcare (LOH) facilities at which the first prescription claim was made, and subsequent healthcare service utilization were collected. We also analyzed the initial pattern in cDMARD prescription and its retention rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21 136 patients were analyzed. Diagnosis of seronegative RA (n = 14 571, 68.9%) was more common than seropositive RA. Seropositive RA was most often discovered in tertiary general hospitals (n = 2230, 34.0%), whereas seronegative RA was most diagnosed in primary care clinics (n = 7539, 51.7%) (P  <  .001). The most prescribed initial cDMARD was hydroxychloroquine as monotherapy (n = 9867, 46.7%). However, methotrexate, a well-established first-line cDMARD, was prescribed in 5447 (25.8%) patients. The discontinuation rate of cDMARD was higher in seronegative than seropositive patients (65.3% vs. 90.3%) and in patients first diagnosed in community LOH (P for trend < .001). The mean number of visits to any outpatient clinics (35/year) was substantially higher than that of the general population. Yet, the number of outpatient visits for RA management was only 2.8/year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The quality of care for newly diagnosed RA patients in South Korea can be improved. Further education on accurate diagnosis and effective treatment is necessary to improve the quality of care provided by other specialists and general practitioners.</p>","PeriodicalId":13800,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143997927","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The evolution of patient-reported safety concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic within a series of study questionnaires: a multi-method analysis. 在一系列研究问卷中,2019冠状病毒病大流行期间患者报告的安全问题的演变:多方法分析
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-05-30 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaf040
Isobel Joy McFadzean, Muslim Bilal, Kate Davies, Delyth Price, Thomas Purchase, Anna Torrens-Burton, Denitza Williams, Rhiannon Phillips, Andrew Carson-Stevens, Natalie Joseph-Williams

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic had a profound impact on healthcare systems globally, with the potential to aggravate levels of healthcare-associated harm. Due to radical changes within service provision, this period was considered likely to influence patient-reported safety concerns. We aimed to characterise the nature of these safety concerns at different time periods after the first UK lockdown.

Methods: A patient-reported safety concerns module was included within the UK COVID-19 Public Experience (COPE) study surveys at three time points: March/April 2021, September/November 2021, and March/April 2022. Participants were asked whether they had experienced any safety concerns whilst using healthcare services during the previous six months, the nature of the concern(s), and to provide a free-text response to describe it. Free-text data were reviewed to identify reports that met the National Health Service (NHS) definition of a patient safety incident. Descriptive analysis was undertaken to identify incident type, contributory factors, and patient outcomes, followed by thematic analysis of the most frequently reported incidents.

Results: Data from 11,604 completed questionnaires were screened over the three time points, and 1,363 (10.0%) participants reported a safety concern, and 722 (53%) concerns met the definition of a patient safety incident: 262/499 (53%) at 12 months; 215/456 (47.1%) at 18 months; and 245/408 (60.1%) at 24 months. The most frequently reported safety incidents involved access to healthcare professionals (12 months/18 months), and errors managing healthcare appointments (24 months). Prominence of themes fluctuated over time, as the context and policies that influenced the safety reports shifted. For example, geographical limitations on healthcare were evident at 12 months, mitigation from healthcare-associated harm by family members at 18 months, and concerns surrounding healthcare professional and other patient's behaviour at 24 months.

Conclusion: Healthcare organisations are undoubtedly still undergoing a protracted period of recovery. However, to protect health services from any further threats to functioning, organisations must review patient safety data systems and examine staff perspectives on the issues identified, notably in relation to infection control policies, social distancing, and patient access to health services. Learning from patient-reported experiences and considering how safety incidents are defined would support improvements in patient safety.

背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行对全球卫生保健系统产生了深远影响,有可能加剧卫生保健相关危害的程度。由于服务提供的急剧变化,这一时期被认为可能影响患者报告的安全问题。我们的目的是在英国第一次封锁后的不同时期描述这些安全问题的性质。方法:在三个时间点(2021年3月/ 4月、2021年9月/ 11月和2022年3月/ 4月),将患者报告的安全问题模块纳入英国COVID-19公共经验(COPE)研究调查。参与者被问及他们在过去六个月使用医疗保健服务时是否遇到过任何安全问题,问题的性质,并提供自由文本回答来描述它。对自由文本数据进行审查,以确定符合国家卫生服务(NHS)对患者安全事件定义的报告。进行描述性分析以确定事件类型、促成因素和患者结局,然后对最常报告的事件进行专题分析。结果:在三个时间点筛选了13604份完整问卷的数据,1363名(10.0%)参与者报告了安全问题,722名(53%)的担忧符合患者安全事件的定义:12个月时262/499 (53%);18个月时215/456 (47.1%);24个月时为245/408(60.1%)。报告中最常见的安全事件涉及获得医疗保健专业人员(12个月/18个月)和管理医疗保健预约的错误(24个月)。随着影响安全报告的背景和政策的变化,主题的突出程度随着时间的推移而波动。例如,在12个月时,医疗保健方面的地理限制很明显;在18个月时,家庭成员减轻了与医疗保健有关的伤害;在24个月时,对医疗保健专业人员和其他患者行为的担忧。结论:医疗保健机构无疑仍在经历一个漫长的恢复期。然而,为了保护卫生服务免受任何进一步的功能威胁,组织必须审查患者安全数据系统,并审查工作人员对所确定问题的看法,特别是与感染控制政策、社会距离和患者获得卫生服务有关的问题。从患者报告的经验中学习,并考虑如何定义安全事件,将有助于改善患者安全。
{"title":"The evolution of patient-reported safety concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic within a series of study questionnaires: a multi-method analysis.","authors":"Isobel Joy McFadzean, Muslim Bilal, Kate Davies, Delyth Price, Thomas Purchase, Anna Torrens-Burton, Denitza Williams, Rhiannon Phillips, Andrew Carson-Stevens, Natalie Joseph-Williams","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf040","DOIUrl":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf040","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic had a profound impact on healthcare systems globally, with the potential to aggravate levels of healthcare-associated harm. Due to radical changes within service provision, this period was considered likely to influence patient-reported safety concerns. We aimed to characterise the nature of these safety concerns at different time periods after the first UK lockdown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A patient-reported safety concerns module was included within the UK COVID-19 Public Experience (COPE) study surveys at three time points: March/April 2021, September/November 2021, and March/April 2022. Participants were asked whether they had experienced any safety concerns whilst using healthcare services during the previous six months, the nature of the concern(s), and to provide a free-text response to describe it. Free-text data were reviewed to identify reports that met the National Health Service (NHS) definition of a patient safety incident. Descriptive analysis was undertaken to identify incident type, contributory factors, and patient outcomes, followed by thematic analysis of the most frequently reported incidents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 11,604 completed questionnaires were screened over the three time points, and 1,363 (10.0%) participants reported a safety concern, and 722 (53%) concerns met the definition of a patient safety incident: 262/499 (53%) at 12 months; 215/456 (47.1%) at 18 months; and 245/408 (60.1%) at 24 months. The most frequently reported safety incidents involved access to healthcare professionals (12 months/18 months), and errors managing healthcare appointments (24 months). Prominence of themes fluctuated over time, as the context and policies that influenced the safety reports shifted. For example, geographical limitations on healthcare were evident at 12 months, mitigation from healthcare-associated harm by family members at 18 months, and concerns surrounding healthcare professional and other patient's behaviour at 24 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Healthcare organisations are undoubtedly still undergoing a protracted period of recovery. However, to protect health services from any further threats to functioning, organisations must review patient safety data systems and examine staff perspectives on the issues identified, notably in relation to infection control policies, social distancing, and patient access to health services. Learning from patient-reported experiences and considering how safety incidents are defined would support improvements in patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":13800,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12510432/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144007349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Innate psychological needs of autonomy, competence, and provider communication as determinants of patients' satisfaction and self-rated health. 自主、能力和提供者沟通的先天心理需求是患者满意度和自评健康的决定因素。
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-05-20 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaf036
Helen Omuya, Wan-Chin Kuo, Betty Chewning

Background: Reports from patient experience and satisfaction surveys are currently being used to target health quality improvement. The patient's healthcare experience is indicative of the interpersonal quality of care and significantly correlates with patient satisfaction as an evaluative measure. Guided by Self-Determination Theory (SDT), this study aims to explore the association of predictor constructs in the theoretical model of STD-perceived provider communication (PPC) and other innate psychological constructs of competence and autonomy with self-rated health (SRH) and healthcare satisfaction (HS). Of particular interest is the SDT construct of relatedness. For this study, it was operationalized as the perceived health communication of a provider. Items relevant to SDT in the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) survey were tested, first, for whether they fall into the predicted SDT constructs and, second, whether and how these constructs were associated with self-reported health and patient HS.

Methods: Two-stage data were analyzed using subsamples from the 2018 and 2019 HRS. Independent variables included items measuring SDT constructs about PPC, psychological well-being, and self-efficacy. Outcome variables included SRH and dimensions of HS, such as cost, quality, and providers. In the first stage, descriptive analyses and exploratory factor analysis were performed to identify the underlying factor structure. Principal axis factoring was used to extract factors. In the second stage, these factors were used in structural equation modeling to examine the relationship between SRH and HS.

Results: Three factors with high internal consistencies (a > 0.8) and item-total correlations (r > 0.5) were identified. Data from the sample fit the structural model (χ2 = 0.00, CFI = 0.954, TLI = 0.946, RMSEA = 0.058, SRMR = 0.047). The structural phase indicated that PPC and competence were positively associated with SRH and HS. However, autonomy was only significantly associated with SRH but not with HS.

Discussion/conclusion: Individuals who rated PPC behaviors and their sense of competence more highly also showed higher satisfaction with multiple healthcare domains and their SRH status. Patient-centered determinants of health outcomes are complex, and more studies are needed to understand their nuances.

背景:来自患者体验和满意度调查的报告目前被用于目标卫生质量的改善。患者的医疗保健经验是指示的人际护理质量和显著相关的患者满意度作为一个评估措施。本研究以自我决定理论(SDT)为指导,探讨性传播疾病感知提供者沟通理论模型中的预测因子构念以及其他能力和自主性的先天心理构念与自我评价健康和医疗保健满意度的关系。特别有趣的是SDT的相关性构造。在本研究中,它被操作为提供者的感知健康沟通。健康与退休研究调查中与SDT相关的项目首先测试它们是否属于预测的SDT结构,其次测试这些结构是否以及如何与自我报告的健康和患者医疗保健满意度相关。方法:使用2018年和2019年健康与退休研究的子样本对两阶段数据进行分析。自变量包括测量SDT结构的项目,包括感知提供者沟通、心理健康和自我效能。结果变量包括自评健康(SRH)和医疗保健满意度(HS)维度,如成本、质量和提供者。在第一阶段,进行描述性分析和探索性因子分析(EFA)来确定潜在的因素结构。采用保理法提取因子。在第二阶段,利用结构方程模型(SEM)来研究这些因素与SRH和HS的关系。结果:确定了具有高内部一致性(a > 0.8)和项目-总相关性(r > 0.5)的三个因素。样本数据符合结构模型(χ2 = 0.00, CFI = 0.954, TLI = 0.946, RMSEA = 0.058, SRMR = 0.047)。结构阶段表明,感知提供者沟通和能力与SRH和HS呈正相关。然而,自主性仅与SRH显著相关,而与HS无显著相关。讨论/结论:对感知提供者沟通行为和能力感评价较高的个体,对多个医疗保健领域和自身性健康健康状况的满意度也较高。以患者为中心的健康结果决定因素是复杂的,需要更多的研究来了解它们的细微差别。
{"title":"Innate psychological needs of autonomy, competence, and provider communication as determinants of patients' satisfaction and self-rated health.","authors":"Helen Omuya, Wan-Chin Kuo, Betty Chewning","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf036","DOIUrl":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf036","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reports from patient experience and satisfaction surveys are currently being used to target health quality improvement. The patient's healthcare experience is indicative of the interpersonal quality of care and significantly correlates with patient satisfaction as an evaluative measure. Guided by Self-Determination Theory (SDT), this study aims to explore the association of predictor constructs in the theoretical model of STD-perceived provider communication (PPC) and other innate psychological constructs of competence and autonomy with self-rated health (SRH) and healthcare satisfaction (HS). Of particular interest is the SDT construct of relatedness. For this study, it was operationalized as the perceived health communication of a provider. Items relevant to SDT in the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) survey were tested, first, for whether they fall into the predicted SDT constructs and, second, whether and how these constructs were associated with self-reported health and patient HS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two-stage data were analyzed using subsamples from the 2018 and 2019 HRS. Independent variables included items measuring SDT constructs about PPC, psychological well-being, and self-efficacy. Outcome variables included SRH and dimensions of HS, such as cost, quality, and providers. In the first stage, descriptive analyses and exploratory factor analysis were performed to identify the underlying factor structure. Principal axis factoring was used to extract factors. In the second stage, these factors were used in structural equation modeling to examine the relationship between SRH and HS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three factors with high internal consistencies (a > 0.8) and item-total correlations (r > 0.5) were identified. Data from the sample fit the structural model (χ2 = 0.00, CFI = 0.954, TLI = 0.946, RMSEA = 0.058, SRMR = 0.047). The structural phase indicated that PPC and competence were positively associated with SRH and HS. However, autonomy was only significantly associated with SRH but not with HS.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>Individuals who rated PPC behaviors and their sense of competence more highly also showed higher satisfaction with multiple healthcare domains and their SRH status. Patient-centered determinants of health outcomes are complex, and more studies are needed to understand their nuances.</p>","PeriodicalId":13800,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143979171","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cost-related medication nonadherence in adults with hypertension in the USA: implications for healthcare quality. 题目:美国成人高血压患者的费用相关药物不依从:对医疗保健质量的影响。
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-05-20 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaf039
Raghuram V Reddy, Karla C Santoyo, Daniela Guerra, Chrisnel Lamy, Attila Hertelendy, Noël C Barengo

Background: Hypertension is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, and it contributed to 685 875 deaths in 2022 in the United States. While antihypertensive medications are effective, cost-related medication non-adherence (CRN) can hinder treatment. This study examined CRN among adults with hypertension, comparing older (≥65 years) and younger (18-64 years) individuals.

Methods: This analytical cross-sectional study utilized data from the National Health Interview Survey Sample from 2019 to 2022. Inclusion criteria involved responding yes to the question 'Have you ever been told by a doctor or health professional that you have hypertension?' and 'Are you currently taking medications for hypertension?'. Participants who lacked responses to any relevant questions were excluded (n = 4441). Participants were stratified into two age groups: 18-64 years old and ≥65 years old. CRN was determined based on measures such as skipping doses, taking less medication, delaying prescription refills, and forgoing medication due to the cost for any medication. Covariates included age, race, ethnicity, sex, insurance status, financial hardship, comorbidities, and geographical region. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: Of 48 559 hypertensive adults, there was a higher percentage of men in the 18-64 years age group compared with the group aged over 65 (51% vs 46%, P-value < .001). In addition, most women (54.0%) were over 65, compared with 48.6% in women between age 18 and 64 years (P-value < .001). Women aged 18-64 years more likely (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.44; 95% CI 1.18, 1.75) to experience CRN than men. Notably, uninsured individuals in both the 18-64 (aOR 2.21; 95% CI 1.51, 3.25) and ≥ 65 (aOR 5.55; 95% CI 1.36, 22.75) age groups were at increased risk of facing CRN.

Conclusion: To mitigate CRN, health quality strategies like prescribing generics, connecting patients with assistance programs, and implementing policies to reduce out-of-pocket costs are essential.

背景:高血压是心血管疾病的重要危险因素,2022年美国有685,875人死于高血压。虽然抗高血压药物是有效的,但与费用相关的药物依从性(CRN)可能会阻碍治疗。本研究检测了成人高血压患者的CRN,比较了老年人(65岁以上)和年轻人(18-64岁)。方法:本分析性横断面研究利用了2019 - 2022年全国健康访谈调查样本的数据。纳入标准包括对“你是否曾被医生或健康专家告知你患有高血压?”和“你目前是否正在服用高血压药物?”这两个问题回答“是”。对任何相关问题缺乏回答的参与者被排除在外(n= 4,441)。参与者被分为两个年龄组:18-64岁和65岁以上。CRN是根据跳过剂量、少服药、延迟处方补药和因任何药物的费用而放弃药物等措施确定的。协变量包括年龄、种族、民族、性别、保险状况、经济困难、合并症和地理区域。使用未调整和调整的逻辑回归模型计算优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。结果:在48,559名高血压成年人中,18-64岁年龄组的男性比例高于65岁以上年龄组(51% vs 46%, p值)。结论:为了减轻CRN,处方仿制药、将患者与援助计划联系起来以及实施政策以减少自付费用等健康质量策略至关重要。
{"title":"Cost-related medication nonadherence in adults with hypertension in the USA: implications for healthcare quality.","authors":"Raghuram V Reddy, Karla C Santoyo, Daniela Guerra, Chrisnel Lamy, Attila Hertelendy, Noël C Barengo","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf039","DOIUrl":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf039","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertension is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, and it contributed to 685 875 deaths in 2022 in the United States. While antihypertensive medications are effective, cost-related medication non-adherence (CRN) can hinder treatment. This study examined CRN among adults with hypertension, comparing older (≥65 years) and younger (18-64 years) individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This analytical cross-sectional study utilized data from the National Health Interview Survey Sample from 2019 to 2022. Inclusion criteria involved responding yes to the question 'Have you ever been told by a doctor or health professional that you have hypertension?' and 'Are you currently taking medications for hypertension?'. Participants who lacked responses to any relevant questions were excluded (n = 4441). Participants were stratified into two age groups: 18-64 years old and ≥65 years old. CRN was determined based on measures such as skipping doses, taking less medication, delaying prescription refills, and forgoing medication due to the cost for any medication. Covariates included age, race, ethnicity, sex, insurance status, financial hardship, comorbidities, and geographical region. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 48 559 hypertensive adults, there was a higher percentage of men in the 18-64 years age group compared with the group aged over 65 (51% vs 46%, P-value < .001). In addition, most women (54.0%) were over 65, compared with 48.6% in women between age 18 and 64 years (P-value < .001). Women aged 18-64 years more likely (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.44; 95% CI 1.18, 1.75) to experience CRN than men. Notably, uninsured individuals in both the 18-64 (aOR 2.21; 95% CI 1.51, 3.25) and ≥ 65 (aOR 5.55; 95% CI 1.36, 22.75) age groups were at increased risk of facing CRN.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To mitigate CRN, health quality strategies like prescribing generics, connecting patients with assistance programs, and implementing policies to reduce out-of-pocket costs are essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":13800,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144014651","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Barriers, facilitators and implementation strategies to implement 'patient's own medication' and 'self-administration of medication' in hospitals. 在医院实施“病人自己用药”和“自我用药”的障碍、促进因素和实施战略。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-05-16 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaf038
Elisabeth M Smale, Jessica van den Berg, Jennifer Korporaal-Heijman, Charlotte L Bekker, Bart J F van den Bemt

Background: Implementing patient's own medication (POM) and self-administration of medication (SAM) has several benefits for safe and sustainable medication use, including enhanced patient empowerment reduced workload for hospital staff and decreased medication waste. Despite positive attitude of stakeholders, the upscaling of these strategies in hospitals remained limited. This study aimed to (i) identify barriers and facilitators for implementing POM and SAM and (ii) develop implementation strategies to address these.

Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted among healthcare providers involved in the implementation of POM and SAM in 10 Dutch hospitals. The study population encompassed (hospital and outpatient) pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, nurses, and (ward) physicians. The topic guide was based on COM-B model. Barriers and facilitators were identified with thematic content analysis and were categorized to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Implementation strategies were selected based on identified barriers through the CFIR- Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) tool and identified strategies were clustered into predefined focus areas to develop implementation targets.

Results: The 23 participants generally expressed a positive attitude towards implementation of POM and SAM. Themes reflecting facilitators related to (i) multiple benefits for patients, hospital, and society, (ii) a dedicated multidisciplinary implementation team, (iii) an iterative implementation process, whereas barriers related to (iv) substantial and invasive workflow changes, (v) reluctance to change responsibilities of healthcare providers, and (vi) unclear regulations and reimbursement. The CFIR-ERIC tool highlighted 57 implementation strategies in nine key focus areas to support the implementation of POM and SAM.

Conclusion: To implement POM and PAM successfully, strategies relating to involving stakeholders, changing infrastructure, and using an iterative implementation process are required.

实施患者自己用药和自我用药对安全和可持续用药有几个好处,包括增强患者赋权,减少医院工作人员的工作量和减少药物浪费。尽管利益攸关方持积极态度,但这些战略在医院的推广仍然有限。本研究旨在(1)确定实施POM和SAM的障碍和促进因素,(2)制定实施策略来解决这些问题。方法采用半结构化访谈法,对荷兰10家医院中参与实施“病人自己用药”和“自我给药”的医护人员进行调查。研究人群包括(医院和门诊)药剂师、药学技术人员、护士和(病房)医生。主题指南基于COM-B模型。通过主题内容分析确定障碍和促进因素,并将其归类为实施研究综合框架(CFIR)。通过CFIR-实施变革的专家建议(ERIC)工具,根据确定的障碍选择实施战略,并将确定的战略聚集到预定义的重点领域,以制定实施目标。结果23名受访医师对“患者自用药”和“自我给药”的实施普遍持积极态度。反映促进因素的主题涉及(1)患者、医院和社会的多重利益,(2)专门的多学科实施团队,以及(3)迭代实施过程,而障碍涉及(4)实质性和侵入性的工作流程变化,(5)不愿改变医疗保健提供者的责任,以及(6)法规和报销不明确。CFIR-ERIC工具强调了9个重点领域的57个实施策略,以支持患者自行用药和自我给药的实施。结论要成功实施患者自主用药和自我用药,需要涉及利益相关者、改变基础设施和使用迭代实施过程的策略。
{"title":"Barriers, facilitators and implementation strategies to implement 'patient's own medication' and 'self-administration of medication' in hospitals.","authors":"Elisabeth M Smale, Jessica van den Berg, Jennifer Korporaal-Heijman, Charlotte L Bekker, Bart J F van den Bemt","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf038","DOIUrl":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Implementing patient's own medication (POM) and self-administration of medication (SAM) has several benefits for safe and sustainable medication use, including enhanced patient empowerment reduced workload for hospital staff and decreased medication waste. Despite positive attitude of stakeholders, the upscaling of these strategies in hospitals remained limited. This study aimed to (i) identify barriers and facilitators for implementing POM and SAM and (ii) develop implementation strategies to address these.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured interviews were conducted among healthcare providers involved in the implementation of POM and SAM in 10 Dutch hospitals. The study population encompassed (hospital and outpatient) pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, nurses, and (ward) physicians. The topic guide was based on COM-B model. Barriers and facilitators were identified with thematic content analysis and were categorized to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Implementation strategies were selected based on identified barriers through the CFIR- Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) tool and identified strategies were clustered into predefined focus areas to develop implementation targets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 23 participants generally expressed a positive attitude towards implementation of POM and SAM. Themes reflecting facilitators related to (i) multiple benefits for patients, hospital, and society, (ii) a dedicated multidisciplinary implementation team, (iii) an iterative implementation process, whereas barriers related to (iv) substantial and invasive workflow changes, (v) reluctance to change responsibilities of healthcare providers, and (vi) unclear regulations and reimbursement. The CFIR-ERIC tool highlighted 57 implementation strategies in nine key focus areas to support the implementation of POM and SAM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To implement POM and PAM successfully, strategies relating to involving stakeholders, changing infrastructure, and using an iterative implementation process are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":13800,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12491946/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144007142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A multifocused approach to drive improvement in acute stroke care: enhance organizational systems, practice cultures, and individual clinician capabilities. 一个多焦点的方法,以推动改善急性卒中护理:加强组织系统,实践文化,和个人临床医生的能力。
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-05-14 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaf042
Menglu Ouyang, David Greenfield
{"title":"A multifocused approach to drive improvement in acute stroke care: enhance organizational systems, practice cultures, and individual clinician capabilities.","authors":"Menglu Ouyang, David Greenfield","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf042","DOIUrl":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf042","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13800,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","volume":"37 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143999381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Some important principles for implementing lean management in healthcare organizations. 在医疗机构中实施精益管理的一些重要原则。
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-05-14 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaf041
Hongnan Ye
{"title":"Some important principles for implementing lean management in healthcare organizations.","authors":"Hongnan Ye","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf041","DOIUrl":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf041","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13800,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","volume":"37 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143970681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
International Journal for Quality in Health Care
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1