Examining bias in the award of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability benefits for posttraumatic stress disorder in women veterans: Analysis of evaluation reports and VA decisions

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Journal of traumatic stress Pub Date : 2024-03-10 DOI:10.1002/jts.23034
Mayumi O. Gianoli, Andrew W. Meisler, Rebecca Gordon
{"title":"Examining bias in the award of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability benefits for posttraumatic stress disorder in women veterans: Analysis of evaluation reports and VA decisions","authors":"Mayumi O. Gianoli,&nbsp;Andrew W. Meisler,&nbsp;Rebecca Gordon","doi":"10.1002/jts.23034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Studies have raised concerns about possible inequities in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)’s awards of disability for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) to women. However, the diagnoses and opinions made by disability examiners have not been studied. A sample of 270 initial PTSD examination reports and corresponding VA decisions were studied. Compared to men, women veterans were as likely to be diagnosed with a service-related mental disorder, χ<sup>2</sup>(1, <i>N</i> = 270) = 2.31, <i>p</i> = .129, odds ratio (<i>OR</i>) = 1.79, 95% CI [0.84, 3.80], and be granted service-connection, χ<sup>2</sup>(1, <i>N</i> = 270) = 0.49, <i>p</i> = .483, <i>OR</i> = 1.28, 95% CI [0.65, 2.51]. Women veterans were considered to have more psychiatric symptoms, <i>Z</i> = −2.05, <i>p</i> = .041, <i>r</i> = .16, and more psychiatric impairment, <i>Z</i> = −2.48, <i>p</i> = .013, <i>r</i> = .20, but the percentage of disability awarded by the VA did not differ, χ<sup>2</sup>(1, <i>N</i> = 270) = 0.49, <i>p</i> = .483; <i>OR</i> = 1.28, 95% CI [0.65, 2.51]. Secondary analyses implicate the role of military sexual trauma and premilitary trauma in explaining sex differences in symptoms and impairment. The findings indicate that neither opinions by examiners nor corresponding decisions by the VA regarding service connection reflect a negative bias toward women veterans. Results indicate that unbiased examinations lead to equitable VA claims decisions for women veterans. Future studies of the VA PTSD disability program nationally, including examination procedures and VA policies and implementation, will promote equity for women veterans in the PTSD claims process.</p>","PeriodicalId":17519,"journal":{"name":"Journal of traumatic stress","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of traumatic stress","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jts.23034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies have raised concerns about possible inequities in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)’s awards of disability for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) to women. However, the diagnoses and opinions made by disability examiners have not been studied. A sample of 270 initial PTSD examination reports and corresponding VA decisions were studied. Compared to men, women veterans were as likely to be diagnosed with a service-related mental disorder, χ2(1, N = 270) = 2.31, p = .129, odds ratio (OR) = 1.79, 95% CI [0.84, 3.80], and be granted service-connection, χ2(1, N = 270) = 0.49, p = .483, OR = 1.28, 95% CI [0.65, 2.51]. Women veterans were considered to have more psychiatric symptoms, Z = −2.05, p = .041, r = .16, and more psychiatric impairment, Z = −2.48, p = .013, r = .20, but the percentage of disability awarded by the VA did not differ, χ2(1, N = 270) = 0.49, p = .483; OR = 1.28, 95% CI [0.65, 2.51]. Secondary analyses implicate the role of military sexual trauma and premilitary trauma in explaining sex differences in symptoms and impairment. The findings indicate that neither opinions by examiners nor corresponding decisions by the VA regarding service connection reflect a negative bias toward women veterans. Results indicate that unbiased examinations lead to equitable VA claims decisions for women veterans. Future studies of the VA PTSD disability program nationally, including examination procedures and VA policies and implementation, will promote equity for women veterans in the PTSD claims process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究退伍军人事务局(VA)在向女性退伍军人发放创伤后应激障碍残疾津贴时存在的偏差:对评估报告和退伍军人事务部决定的分析。
研究表明,美国退伍军人事务部(VA)在向妇女发放创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)残疾赔偿金时可能存在不公平现象,这引起了人们的关注。然而,我们尚未对伤残鉴定人员的诊断和意见进行研究。我们对 270 份创伤后应激障碍初步检查报告和退伍军人事务部的相应决定进行了抽样研究。与男性退伍军人相比,女性退伍军人被诊断出患有与服役相关的精神障碍的几率为 χ2 (1, N = 270) = 2.31, p = .129, 赔率比 (OR) = 1.79, 95% CI [0.84, 3.80],被授予服役关系的几率为 χ2 (1, N = 270) = 0.49, p = .483, OR = 1.28, 95% CI [0.65, 2.51]。女性退伍军人被认为具有更多的精神症状(Z = -2.05,p = .041,r = .16)和更多的精神损伤(Z = -2.48,p = .013,r = .20),但退伍军人事务部授予的残疾百分比没有差异(χ2 (1, N = 270) = 0.49,p = .483;OR = 1.28,95% CI [0.65,2.51])。二次分析显示,军队性创伤和入伍前创伤在解释症状和损伤的性别差异方面发挥了作用。研究结果表明,无论是检查人员的意见还是退伍军人事务部关于服役关系的相应决定,都没有反映出对女性退伍军人的负面偏见。结果表明,无偏见的检查会导致退伍军人事务部为女性退伍军人做出公平的索赔决定。未来在全国范围内对退伍军人事务部创伤后应激障碍残疾计划的研究,包括检查程序和退伍军人事务部的政策和实施,将促进女性退伍军人在创伤后应激障碍索赔过程中的公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
125
期刊介绍: Journal of Traumatic Stress (JTS) is published for the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. Journal of Traumatic Stress , the official publication for the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, is an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on biopsychosocial aspects of trauma. Papers focus on theoretical formulations, research, treatment, prevention education/training, and legal and policy concerns. Journal of Traumatic Stress serves as a primary reference for professionals who study and treat people exposed to highly stressful and traumatic events (directly or through their occupational roles), such as war, disaster, accident, violence or abuse (criminal or familial), hostage-taking, or life-threatening illness. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, review papers, commentaries, and, from time to time, special issues devoted to a single topic.
期刊最新文献
The three axioms of resilience. A functional approach to defining and repairing moral injury: Evidence, change agents, clinical strategies, and lessons learned. Walking the line between fidelity and flexibility: A conceptual review of personalized approaches to manualized treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder. Medical traumatic stress: Integrating evidence-based clinical applications from health and trauma psychology. Conceptualizing disparities and differences in the psychobiology of traumatic stress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1