Daily general discrimination predicts changes in trait negative affectivity: A 30-year cohort longitudinal study using a random-intercept cross-lagged panel model.

IF 5 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Journal of Personality Pub Date : 2024-03-11 DOI:10.1111/jopy.12927
Allison M Daurio, Jeanette Taylor
{"title":"Daily general discrimination predicts changes in trait negative affectivity: A 30-year cohort longitudinal study using a random-intercept cross-lagged panel model.","authors":"Allison M Daurio, Jeanette Taylor","doi":"10.1111/jopy.12927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Increasing evidence indicates discrimination is an emerging risk factor for reducing psychological well-being. Negative affectivity is a personality trait that has been associated with discrimination. Yet, few studies to date have examined the longitudinal relationship between discrimination and personality. The current study addresses this gap by examining how general discrimination and negative affectivity influence each other longitudinally.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) dataset was used for the current study. The MIDUS sample (N = 4244) was predominately white (90.7%), 52% female, and had an average age of 46 years old. Individuals completed follow-up measures 10 and 20 years after baseline. Data were analyzed using a random-intercept cross-lagged panel model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals that scored higher on trait negative affectivity also tended to score higher on perceived daily discrimination. We found general perceived discrimination at age 55 unidirectionally predicted changes in negative affectivity around retirement age, but not from age 45 to 55. In contrast, negative affectivity did not significantly predict increases in perceived discrimination at any timepoint.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results indicate that perceived discrimination has pernicious impacts on well-being up to a decade later and may do so by increasing an individual's tendency to experience negative emotions (i.e., negative affectivity).</p>","PeriodicalId":48421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12927","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Increasing evidence indicates discrimination is an emerging risk factor for reducing psychological well-being. Negative affectivity is a personality trait that has been associated with discrimination. Yet, few studies to date have examined the longitudinal relationship between discrimination and personality. The current study addresses this gap by examining how general discrimination and negative affectivity influence each other longitudinally.

Method: The Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) dataset was used for the current study. The MIDUS sample (N = 4244) was predominately white (90.7%), 52% female, and had an average age of 46 years old. Individuals completed follow-up measures 10 and 20 years after baseline. Data were analyzed using a random-intercept cross-lagged panel model.

Results: Individuals that scored higher on trait negative affectivity also tended to score higher on perceived daily discrimination. We found general perceived discrimination at age 55 unidirectionally predicted changes in negative affectivity around retirement age, but not from age 45 to 55. In contrast, negative affectivity did not significantly predict increases in perceived discrimination at any timepoint.

Conclusion: Our results indicate that perceived discrimination has pernicious impacts on well-being up to a decade later and may do so by increasing an individual's tendency to experience negative emotions (i.e., negative affectivity).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日常一般歧视可预测特质消极情绪的变化:使用随机截距交叉滞后面板模型的 30 年队列纵向研究。
目的:越来越多的证据表明,歧视是降低心理健康水平的新风险因素。消极情绪是一种与歧视有关的人格特质。然而,迄今为止很少有研究探讨歧视与人格之间的纵向关系。本研究通过研究一般歧视和消极情绪如何纵向相互影响,弥补了这一空白:本研究使用了美国中年(MIDUS)数据集。MIDUS 样本(N = 4244)主要为白人(90.7%),52%为女性,平均年龄为 46 岁。这些人在基线后 10 年和 20 年完成了跟踪调查。数据采用随机截距交叉滞后面板模型进行分析:结果:在特质消极情绪方面得分较高的人在日常歧视感方面的得分也往往较高。我们发现,55 岁时感知到的一般歧视可以单向预测退休年龄前后的负情感变化,但不能预测 45 岁至 55 岁期间的负情感变化。相反,负情感在任何时间点都不能显著预测感知到的歧视的增加:我们的研究结果表明,感知到的歧视会对十年后的幸福感产生有害影响,并且可能会通过增加个体体验负面情绪的倾向(即负面情绪性)来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personality
Journal of Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
6.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: Journal of Personality publishes scientific investigations in the field of personality. It focuses particularly on personality and behavior dynamics, personality development, and individual differences in the cognitive, affective, and interpersonal domains. The journal reflects and stimulates interest in the growth of new theoretical and methodological approaches in personality psychology.
期刊最新文献
Paragons of character-Character strengths and well-being of moral, creative, and religious exemplars. Who makes a more consistent first impression? Examining the structure and correlates of dissensus. Primary affective systems and personality: Disentangling the within-person reciprocal relationships. Development of beliefs in a just world among Chinese early adolescents and the predictive role of family factors: A three-wave longitudinal study. Purpose and goal pursuit as a self-sustaining system: Evidence of daily within-person reciprocity among adolescents in self-driven learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1