Mortality After Alcohol Septal Ablation vs. Septal Myectomy in Patients With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Circulation reports Pub Date : 2024-02-21 eCollection Date: 2024-03-08 DOI:10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0101
Risako Yasuda, Itsuki Osawa, Tadahiro Goto, Kohei Hasegawa, Michael A Fifer, Albree Tower-Rader, Muredach P Reilly, Mathew S Maurer, Yanling Zhao, Hiroo Takayama, Yuichi J Shimada
{"title":"Mortality After Alcohol Septal Ablation vs. Septal Myectomy in Patients With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.","authors":"Risako Yasuda, Itsuki Osawa, Tadahiro Goto, Kohei Hasegawa, Michael A Fifer, Albree Tower-Rader, Muredach P Reilly, Mathew S Maurer, Yanling Zhao, Hiroo Takayama, Yuichi J Shimada","doi":"10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Alcohol septal ablation (ASA) and septal myectomy (SM) are 2 options for septal reduction therapy (SRT) to treat medication-resistant symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Because differences in mortality rates after these different SRT methods have not been extensively investigated in real-world settings, in this study compared the 1-year mortality rates after ASA and SM using population-based database. <b><i>Methods and Results:</i></b> Utilizing New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) data from 2005 to 2016, we performed a comparative effectiveness study of ASA vs. SM in patients with HCM. The outcome was all-cause death up to 360 days after SRT. We constructed a multivariable logistic regression model and performed sensitivity analysis with propensity score (PS)-matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) methods. We identified 755 patients with HCM who underwent SRT: 348 with ASA and 407 with SM. The multivariable analysis showed that all-cause deaths were significantly fewer in the ASA group at 360 days after SRT (adjusted odds ratio=0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.84; P=0.02). The PS-matching and IPTW methods also supported a lower mortality rate in the ASA group at 360 days post-SRT. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In this population-based study of patients with HCM who underwent SRT in a real-world setting, the 1-year all-cause mortality rate was significantly lower in patients who underwent ASA compared with SM.</p>","PeriodicalId":94305,"journal":{"name":"Circulation reports","volume":"6 3","pages":"74-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10920015/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Alcohol septal ablation (ASA) and septal myectomy (SM) are 2 options for septal reduction therapy (SRT) to treat medication-resistant symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Because differences in mortality rates after these different SRT methods have not been extensively investigated in real-world settings, in this study compared the 1-year mortality rates after ASA and SM using population-based database. Methods and Results: Utilizing New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) data from 2005 to 2016, we performed a comparative effectiveness study of ASA vs. SM in patients with HCM. The outcome was all-cause death up to 360 days after SRT. We constructed a multivariable logistic regression model and performed sensitivity analysis with propensity score (PS)-matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) methods. We identified 755 patients with HCM who underwent SRT: 348 with ASA and 407 with SM. The multivariable analysis showed that all-cause deaths were significantly fewer in the ASA group at 360 days after SRT (adjusted odds ratio=0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.84; P=0.02). The PS-matching and IPTW methods also supported a lower mortality rate in the ASA group at 360 days post-SRT. Conclusions: In this population-based study of patients with HCM who underwent SRT in a real-world setting, the 1-year all-cause mortality rate was significantly lower in patients who underwent ASA compared with SM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阻塞性肥厚型心肌病患者进行酒精室间隔消融术与室间隔黏膜切除术后的死亡率。
背景:酒精室间隔消融术(ASA)和室间隔肌肉切除术(SM)是室间隔减容疗法(SRT)的两种选择,用于治疗耐药的症状性阻塞性肥厚型心肌病(HCM)。由于尚未在现实世界中广泛调查这些不同 SRT 方法后死亡率的差异,因此本研究利用人口数据库比较了 ASA 和 SM 术后 1 年的死亡率。方法和结果:利用纽约州规划与研究合作系统(SPARCS)2005 年至 2016 年的数据,我们对 HCM 患者进行了 ASA 与 SM 的疗效比较研究。研究结果为 SRT 后 360 天内的全因死亡。我们构建了一个多变量逻辑回归模型,并采用倾向评分(PS)匹配法和逆治疗概率加权法(IPTW)进行了敏感性分析。我们确定了 755 名接受 SRT 的 HCM 患者:其中 348 人接受了 ASA 治疗,407 人接受了 SM 治疗。多变量分析显示,在 SRT 后 360 天内,ASA 组的全因死亡人数明显较少(调整后的几率比=0.34;95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.13-0.84;P=0.02)。PS匹配法和IPTW法也支持在SRT后360天时ASA组的死亡率较低。结论:在这项针对在真实世界环境中接受 SRT 的 HCM 患者的人群研究中,与 SM 相比,接受 ASA 治疗的患者 1 年全因死亡率显著降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Driven Frailty Prediction Using Electronic Health Records in Hospitalized Patients With Cardiovascular Disease. Outcomes of Older Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Using the Impella Device - Insights From the Japanese Registry for Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device (J-PVAD). Bioprosthetic Valve Positions in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation - Insights From the BPV-AF Registry. Incidence of Angiographic Deterioration Following Inframalleolar Angioplasty and Its Impact on Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Requiring Repeat Intervention. Phase III Cardiac Rehabilitation: Ambulatory Heart Groups - A Model From Germany.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1