Simulating decadal cross-shore dynamics at nourished coasts with Crocodile

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Coastal Engineering Pub Date : 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1016/j.coastaleng.2024.104491
Tosca Kettler , Matthieu de Schipper , Arjen Luijendijk
{"title":"Simulating decadal cross-shore dynamics at nourished coasts with Crocodile","authors":"Tosca Kettler ,&nbsp;Matthieu de Schipper ,&nbsp;Arjen Luijendijk","doi":"10.1016/j.coastaleng.2024.104491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Projections of high rates of sea level rise have stimulated proposals for adaptation strategies with increasingly high nourishment volumes along sandy beaches. An underlying assumption is that coastal profiles respond rapidly to nourishments by redistributing sediments towards a (new) equilibrium shape. However, this perception may not be valid when high volumes of nourishment are applied, as the profile shape may then undergo significant deformation. Current state-of-the-art modelling techniques often concentrate on a single spatio-temporal scale, either lacking the necessary temporal horizon or failing to provide the required level of cross-shore detail. This article introduces Crocodile, a diffusion based cross-shore model designed to bridge the gap between short- and long-term nourishment modelling. The model simulates the effects of nourishment strategies on coastal volume, coastline position and beach width over a decadal timeframe. It incorporates different elements which compute cross-shore diffusion, sediment exchange with the dune and longshore sediment losses. To test the model performance, a series of idealized nourishment scenarios are examined, along with three case studies along the Dutch coast with different nourishment strategies over the past few decades. The modelled coastal volume, shoreline position and beach width strongly resemble the observations with only a 12% overestimation in profile volume and 13% underestimation in beach width. Averaged over selected periods of nourishment, trends and trend reversals between different strategies are well replicated with slight overestimation for coastal volume trends by <span><math><mrow><mn>1.5</mn><mspace></mspace><msup><mi>m</mi><mn>3</mn></msup><mo>/</mo><mi>m</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>y</mi><mi>r</mi><mspace></mspace><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mn>10</mn><mo>%</mo></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></math></span>, while beach width trends are underestimated by <span><math><mrow><mn>0.2</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>m</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>y</mi><mi>r</mi></mrow></math></span> (15%). Given that the added nourishment volumes are typically in the order of <span><math><mrow><mn>100</mn><mspace></mspace><msup><mi>m</mi><mn>3</mn></msup><mo>/</mo><mi>m</mi></mrow></math></span>, these model errors are considered sufficiently low to conclude that Crocodile effectively simulates variations in coastal volume, coastline position and beach width over a decadal timeframe in response to different nourishment strategies. Therefore, Crocodile can facilitate the evaluation of future nourishment strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50996,"journal":{"name":"Coastal Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378383924000395/pdfft?md5=c22b93203a1285a9ae3d91c288db7a56&pid=1-s2.0-S0378383924000395-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coastal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378383924000395","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Projections of high rates of sea level rise have stimulated proposals for adaptation strategies with increasingly high nourishment volumes along sandy beaches. An underlying assumption is that coastal profiles respond rapidly to nourishments by redistributing sediments towards a (new) equilibrium shape. However, this perception may not be valid when high volumes of nourishment are applied, as the profile shape may then undergo significant deformation. Current state-of-the-art modelling techniques often concentrate on a single spatio-temporal scale, either lacking the necessary temporal horizon or failing to provide the required level of cross-shore detail. This article introduces Crocodile, a diffusion based cross-shore model designed to bridge the gap between short- and long-term nourishment modelling. The model simulates the effects of nourishment strategies on coastal volume, coastline position and beach width over a decadal timeframe. It incorporates different elements which compute cross-shore diffusion, sediment exchange with the dune and longshore sediment losses. To test the model performance, a series of idealized nourishment scenarios are examined, along with three case studies along the Dutch coast with different nourishment strategies over the past few decades. The modelled coastal volume, shoreline position and beach width strongly resemble the observations with only a 12% overestimation in profile volume and 13% underestimation in beach width. Averaged over selected periods of nourishment, trends and trend reversals between different strategies are well replicated with slight overestimation for coastal volume trends by 1.5m3/m/yr(10%), while beach width trends are underestimated by 0.2m/yr (15%). Given that the added nourishment volumes are typically in the order of 100m3/m, these model errors are considered sufficiently low to conclude that Crocodile effectively simulates variations in coastal volume, coastline position and beach width over a decadal timeframe in response to different nourishment strategies. Therefore, Crocodile can facilitate the evaluation of future nourishment strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用鳄鱼模拟被滋养海岸的十年跨岸动力学
对海平面上升速度的预测,促使人们提出了在沙滩上进行越来越多的冲刷的适应战 略。一个基本的假设是,沿岸剖面通过重新分配沉积物,使之达到(新的)平衡形状, 从而对营养盐做出快速反应。然而,当采用大容量营养盐时,这种看法可能就不成立了,因为这时海岸剖面的形 状可能会发生显著的变形。目前最先进的建模技术往往集中在单一时空尺度上,要么缺乏必要的时间跨度,要么无法提供所需的跨岸细节。本文介绍的 Crocodile 是一种基于扩散的跨岸模型,旨在弥补短期和长期滋养模型之间的差距。该模型模拟了在十年时间框架内,各种营养化策略对海岸容积、海岸线位置和海滩宽度的影响。它包含不同的要素,可计算跨岸扩散、与沙丘的沉积物交换和长岸沉积物损失。为了检验模型的性能,研究了一系列理想化的泥沙淤积方案,并对荷兰海岸在过去 几十年中采用不同泥沙淤积策略的三个案例进行了研究。模拟的海岸容积、海岸线位置和海滩宽度与观测结果非常相似,只是剖面容积高估了 12%,海滩宽度低估了 13%。在所选的若干时期内的平均值,不同策略之间的趋势和趋势逆转都得到了很好的复 现,沿岸体积的趋势略高估了 1.5 立方米/米/年(10%),而海滩宽度的趋势则低估了 0.2 米/年(15%)。考虑到增加的围垦量通常在 100 立方米/米左右,这些模型误差被认为很低,足以认定 Crocodile 能有效地模拟十年期内沿岸容积、海岸线位置和海滩宽度随不同围垦策略的变化。因此,Crocodile 可以帮助评估未来的围垦战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Coastal Engineering
Coastal Engineering 工程技术-工程:大洋
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
13.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Coastal Engineering is an international medium for coastal engineers and scientists. Combining practical applications with modern technological and scientific approaches, such as mathematical and numerical modelling, laboratory and field observations and experiments, it publishes fundamental studies as well as case studies on the following aspects of coastal, harbour and offshore engineering: waves, currents and sediment transport; coastal, estuarine and offshore morphology; technical and functional design of coastal and harbour structures; morphological and environmental impact of coastal, harbour and offshore structures.
期刊最新文献
An enhanced model for an extreme wave impacting a vertical cylinder An adaptive internal mass source wave-maker for short wave generation Convergence and divergence of storm waves induced by multi-scale currents: Observations and coupled wave-current modeling Wave overtopping discharges at rubble mound structures in shallow water Computations of energetic nearshore waves: Are weakly dispersive phase-resolving models telling the same story?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1