Understanding farm typology for targeting agricultural development in mixed crop-livestock farming systems of Ethiopia

Meron Awoke Eshetae , Wuletawu Abera , Lulseged Tamene , Kalkidan Mulatu , Abonesh Tesfaye
{"title":"Understanding farm typology for targeting agricultural development in mixed crop-livestock farming systems of Ethiopia","authors":"Meron Awoke Eshetae ,&nbsp;Wuletawu Abera ,&nbsp;Lulseged Tamene ,&nbsp;Kalkidan Mulatu ,&nbsp;Abonesh Tesfaye","doi":"10.1016/j.farsys.2024.100088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Capturing the heterogeneity of farming systems through farm typology is essential for targeting agricultural interventions in any mixed crop-livestock farming system. Therefore, this study aims to construct a farm typology for the Doyogena and Basona districts of Southern and Northern Ethiopia, respectively. A combination of principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering (HC) was used to develop a generalized and domain-specific farm typology in the study areas using farm household survey data collected from 503 respondents. A generalized farm typology was constructed considering all the dataset variables whereas the domain-specific farm typology was developed once all the data variables had been categorized into three groups: variables that describe i) the resource endowment, ii) technologies used, and iii) food and nutrition characteristics of the farm. The farm types identified from the domain-specific farm typologies were merged to develop comprehensive, representative, and meaningful farm types. In both districts, the results of the generalized farm typology are more generic, and are not able to fully capture the diversity of farmers’ resource endowment and food and nutrition security status. Compared to the generalized farm typology, the domain-specific farm typology is more useful for targeting tailored agricultural development interventions. The merged typology results show that a combination of medium resource endowment with medium income, medium technology, and low food and nutrition security farm type (34%) is the dominant farm type in the study areas followed by a farm type combining low resource endowment with low income, high technology and marginal food and nutrition secure (21%). The findings of this study provide several insights into targeting and scaling domain-specific agricultural development interventions that can be applicable for sustainable intensification of mixed farming systems. For example, growing multiple crops in crop rotations and as intercrops; implementing conservation tillage, and introducing improved seed varieties, and livestock breeds offer possible pathways for sustainable agricultural intensification for medium resource endowment, medium technology, and low food and nutrition security farm types.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100522,"journal":{"name":"Farming System","volume":"2 3","pages":"Article 100088"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949911924000182/pdfft?md5=bc6a8ca5eb6def8e8179a2c282f9a911&pid=1-s2.0-S2949911924000182-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farming System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949911924000182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Capturing the heterogeneity of farming systems through farm typology is essential for targeting agricultural interventions in any mixed crop-livestock farming system. Therefore, this study aims to construct a farm typology for the Doyogena and Basona districts of Southern and Northern Ethiopia, respectively. A combination of principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering (HC) was used to develop a generalized and domain-specific farm typology in the study areas using farm household survey data collected from 503 respondents. A generalized farm typology was constructed considering all the dataset variables whereas the domain-specific farm typology was developed once all the data variables had been categorized into three groups: variables that describe i) the resource endowment, ii) technologies used, and iii) food and nutrition characteristics of the farm. The farm types identified from the domain-specific farm typologies were merged to develop comprehensive, representative, and meaningful farm types. In both districts, the results of the generalized farm typology are more generic, and are not able to fully capture the diversity of farmers’ resource endowment and food and nutrition security status. Compared to the generalized farm typology, the domain-specific farm typology is more useful for targeting tailored agricultural development interventions. The merged typology results show that a combination of medium resource endowment with medium income, medium technology, and low food and nutrition security farm type (34%) is the dominant farm type in the study areas followed by a farm type combining low resource endowment with low income, high technology and marginal food and nutrition secure (21%). The findings of this study provide several insights into targeting and scaling domain-specific agricultural development interventions that can be applicable for sustainable intensification of mixed farming systems. For example, growing multiple crops in crop rotations and as intercrops; implementing conservation tillage, and introducing improved seed varieties, and livestock breeds offer possible pathways for sustainable agricultural intensification for medium resource endowment, medium technology, and low food and nutrition security farm types.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解农场类型,确定埃塞俄比亚作物-牲畜混合农业系统的农业发展目标
通过农场类型学捕捉农耕系统的异质性,对于在任何作物-牲畜混合农耕系统中有的放矢地采取农业干预措施至关重要。因此,本研究旨在分别为埃塞俄比亚南部和北部的 Doyogena 和 Basona 地区构建农场类型学。利用从 503 名受访者处收集的农户调查数据,结合主成分分析法(PCA)和分层聚类法(HC),对研究地区的农场类型进行了归纳和特定领域的分类。一般化农场类型的构建考虑了所有数据集变量,而特定领域农场类型则是在将所有数据变量分为三组后建立的:变量描述了农场的 i) 资源禀赋,ii) 所用技术,iii) 食物和营养特征。从特定领域农场类型学中确定的农场类型被合并,以形成全面、有代表性和有意义的农场类型。在这两个地区,广义农场类型学的结果更具通用性,无法全面反映农民资源禀赋和粮食与营养安全状况的多样性。与一般化的农场类型学相比,特定领域的农场类型学更有助于有针对性地采取农业发展干预措施。合并类型学结果显示,中等资源禀赋与中等收入、中等技术以及低粮食和营养安全相结合的农场类型(34%)是研究地区的主要农场类型,其次是低资源禀赋与低收入、高技术以及边缘粮食和营养安全相结合的农场类型(21%)。这项研究的结果为针对和扩大特定领域的农业发展干预措施提供了若干启示,这些干预措施可适用于混合耕作制度的可持续强化。例如,在作物轮作和间作中种植多种作物;实施保护性耕作;引进改良种子品种和牲畜品种,这些都为中等资源禀赋、中等技术和低粮食与营养安全农场类型的可持续农业集约化提供了可能的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the performance of biobased, recovered nitrogen fertilizers in European cropping systems using modelling Multicriteria assessment of recently implemented conservation agriculture cropping systems across farmers’ plots in northwestern Cambodia How has scientific literature addressed crop planning at farm level: A bibliometric-qualitative review Spatiotemporal variation of crop diversification across Eastern Indo Gangetic plains of South Asia Perennial rice – An alternative to the ‘one-sow, one-harvest’ rice production: Benefits, challenges, and future prospects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1