TDCS over PPC or DLPFC does not improve visual working memory capacity

Shuangke Jiang, Myles Jones, Claudia C. von Bastian
{"title":"TDCS over PPC or DLPFC does not improve visual working memory capacity","authors":"Shuangke Jiang, Myles Jones, Claudia C. von Bastian","doi":"10.1038/s44271-024-00067-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-invasive brain stimulation has been highlighted as a possible intervention to induce cognitive benefits, including on visual working memory (VWM). However, findings are inconsistent, possibly due to methodological issues. A recent high-profile study by Wang et al.1 reported that anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over posterior parietal cortex (PPC), but not over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), selectively improved VWM capacity but not precision, especially at a high VWM load. Thus, in the current pre-registered conceptual replication study, we accounted for the key potential methodological issues in the original study and tested an adequate number of participants required to demonstrate the previously reported effects (n = 48 compared to n = 20). Participants underwent counterbalanced PPC, DLPFC and sham stimulation before completing 360 trials of a continuous orientation-reproduction task with a slight variation of task stimuli and setup. We found no evidence for the selective effect of PPC stimulation. Instead, our results showed that tDCS effects were absent regardless of stimulation region and VWM load, which was largely supported by substantial to strong Bayesian evidence. Therefore, our results challenge previously reported benefits of single-session anodal PPC-tDCS on VWM. In contrast to recent findings, a replication study shows no effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on visual working memory.","PeriodicalId":501698,"journal":{"name":"Communications Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44271-024-00067-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44271-024-00067-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-invasive brain stimulation has been highlighted as a possible intervention to induce cognitive benefits, including on visual working memory (VWM). However, findings are inconsistent, possibly due to methodological issues. A recent high-profile study by Wang et al.1 reported that anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over posterior parietal cortex (PPC), but not over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), selectively improved VWM capacity but not precision, especially at a high VWM load. Thus, in the current pre-registered conceptual replication study, we accounted for the key potential methodological issues in the original study and tested an adequate number of participants required to demonstrate the previously reported effects (n = 48 compared to n = 20). Participants underwent counterbalanced PPC, DLPFC and sham stimulation before completing 360 trials of a continuous orientation-reproduction task with a slight variation of task stimuli and setup. We found no evidence for the selective effect of PPC stimulation. Instead, our results showed that tDCS effects were absent regardless of stimulation region and VWM load, which was largely supported by substantial to strong Bayesian evidence. Therefore, our results challenge previously reported benefits of single-session anodal PPC-tDCS on VWM. In contrast to recent findings, a replication study shows no effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on visual working memory.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 PPC 或 DLPFC 上进行 TDCS 不会提高视觉工作记忆能力
非侵入性脑部刺激作为一种可能的干预措施,已被强调为可诱发认知益处,包括视觉工作记忆(VWM)。然而,研究结果并不一致,这可能是由于方法问题。最近,Wang 等人1 的一项备受瞩目的研究报告称,对后顶叶皮层(PPC)而非背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)进行阳极经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)可选择性地提高视觉工作记忆的容量,但不能提高精确度,尤其是在视觉工作记忆负荷较高的情况下。因此,在当前的预注册概念复制研究中,我们考虑到了原始研究中潜在的关键方法问题,并测试了足够数量的参与者(n = 48,而不是 n = 20),以证明之前报告的效果。受试者在完成 360 次连续方位再现任务之前接受了 PPC、DLPFC 和假刺激,任务刺激和设置略有不同。我们没有发现任何证据表明 PPC 刺激具有选择性效应。相反,我们的研究结果表明,无论刺激区域和 VWM 负载如何,tDCS 都没有效果,这在很大程度上得到了大量贝叶斯证据的支持。因此,我们的结果对之前报道的单次正极 PPC-tDCS 对 VWM 的益处提出了质疑。与最近的研究结果相反,一项重复研究显示经颅直流电刺激对视觉工作记忆没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Parent-child relationship quality predicts higher subjective well-being in adulthood across a diverse group of countries Sensory stimulation enhances visual working memory capacity Psychoacoustic and Archeoacoustic nature of ancient Aztec skull whistles Three diverse motives for information sharing Cultural contexts differentially shape parents’ loneliness and wellbeing during the empty nest period
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1