Processing dissociations between raising and control in Brazilian Portuguese

IF 0.8 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Journal of Linguistics Pub Date : 2024-03-11 DOI:10.1017/s002222672400001x
Doug Merchant, Timothy Gupton
{"title":"Processing dissociations between raising and control in Brazilian Portuguese","authors":"Doug Merchant, Timothy Gupton","doi":"10.1017/s002222672400001x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Generative approaches to syntactic control have traditionally viewed it as a distinct component of the grammar, one that governs the interpretation and distribution of the <span>empty category</span> (EC) PRO. However, the M<span>ovement</span> T<span>heory of</span> C<span>ontrol</span> (MTC) proposes that control should instead be conceived of as a form of raising, with both sentence types involving the EC DP/NP T<span>race</span>. In addition to theoretical arguments, some behavioral research on antecedent reactivation has demonstrated that different ECs reactivate their antecedents to different degrees and at different points in the time course of comprehension. In this study, we used a cross-modal repetition priming paradigm to examine antecedent reactivation in Brazilian Portuguese. We found significantly greater activation at the gap position in raising sentences and in those with overt pronouns as compared to (exhaustive) control sentences, consistent with the standard account of raising and the traditional view of control as involving a distinct EC. Additionally, we found some evidence for a differentiation between exhaustive and partial control structures. Overall, our results suggest that 1) similar linguistic mechanisms are employed in the processing of sentences that involve overt pronouns and DP/NP traces, and 2) different mechanisms are employed in the processing of raising and control structures, a finding we view as inconsistent with the MTC.</p>","PeriodicalId":47027,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Linguistics","volume":"152 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s002222672400001x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Generative approaches to syntactic control have traditionally viewed it as a distinct component of the grammar, one that governs the interpretation and distribution of the empty category (EC) PRO. However, the Movement Theory of Control (MTC) proposes that control should instead be conceived of as a form of raising, with both sentence types involving the EC DP/NP Trace. In addition to theoretical arguments, some behavioral research on antecedent reactivation has demonstrated that different ECs reactivate their antecedents to different degrees and at different points in the time course of comprehension. In this study, we used a cross-modal repetition priming paradigm to examine antecedent reactivation in Brazilian Portuguese. We found significantly greater activation at the gap position in raising sentences and in those with overt pronouns as compared to (exhaustive) control sentences, consistent with the standard account of raising and the traditional view of control as involving a distinct EC. Additionally, we found some evidence for a differentiation between exhaustive and partial control structures. Overall, our results suggest that 1) similar linguistic mechanisms are employed in the processing of sentences that involve overt pronouns and DP/NP traces, and 2) different mechanisms are employed in the processing of raising and control structures, a finding we view as inconsistent with the MTC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西葡萄牙语中提高和控制之间的处理差异
句法控制的生成方法历来将其视为语法中的一个独立组成部分,它支配着空范畴(EC)PRO 的解释和分配。然而,"控制运动理论"(MTC)提出,控制应被视为一种提升形式,两种句子类型都涉及EC DP/NP Trace。除了理论上的论证之外,一些关于前置词再激活的行为学研究也证明,在理解的时间过程中,不同的EC会在不同的点上对其前置词进行不同程度的再激活。在本研究中,我们使用了跨模态重复引物范式来研究巴西葡萄牙语中的前因再激活。我们发现,与(详尽无遗的)控制句子相比,在提高句子和带有明显代词的句子中,间隙位置的激活明显更强,这与提高句子的标准解释和控制句子涉及独特的EC的传统观点一致。此外,我们还发现了详尽控制结构和部分控制结构之间存在差异的一些证据。总之,我们的研究结果表明:1)在处理涉及明显代词和 DP/NP 痕迹的句子时,使用了类似的语言机制;2)在处理提升和控制结构时,使用了不同的机制,我们认为这一结果与 MTC 不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Journal of Linguistics (JL) has as its goal to publish articles that make a clear contribution to current debate in all branches of theoretical linguistics. The journal also provides an excellent survey of recent linguistics publications, with around thirty book reviews in each volume and regular review articles on major works marking important theoretical advances. View a FREE collection of JL papers, highlighting the Journal"s broad coverage
期刊最新文献
Non-agreeing degree constructions Separability of dependents from VP in English: Beyond the argument/adjunct distinction Mutation, allomorphy and Galician clitics Chinese copy raising and its implications for predication Theme-vowel minimal pairs show argument structure alternations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1