An Observational Study on Cosmetics Use-related Adverse Effects: Cosmetovigilance Need of the Day.

IF 1.7 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Drug Research Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-11 DOI:10.1055/a-2251-6655
Geetika Mehta, Daksh Raj Tyagi, Monika Sachdeva, Rashmi Tripathi, Himanshu Tyagi
{"title":"An Observational Study on Cosmetics Use-related Adverse Effects: Cosmetovigilance Need of the Day.","authors":"Geetika Mehta, Daksh Raj Tyagi, Monika Sachdeva, Rashmi Tripathi, Himanshu Tyagi","doi":"10.1055/a-2251-6655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The pursuit of aesthetic attractiveness and increased awareness have contributed significantly to the growth of the cosmetic industry. However, it is crucial to recognize that even the minimal use of cosmetics may have harmful consequences for both the overall well-being and the broader community, an issue that has yet to be adequately recognized or addressed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study is aimed at providing insights into the usage pattern of consumer behavior regarding skin care products and to assess the prevalence and determinants of cosmetic-related adverse events among the general populace.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A community-based cross-sectional study was carried out for four months in a satellite city of the National Capital Region (NCR) of India. The data from 435 respondents was collected using a self-administered questionnaire and analyzed using frequencies and percentages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 435 participants, 32.9% experienced one or more adverse effects owing to the use of skincare products; the prevalence was higher in females (36.3%). Hair loss, allergies, and dry skin were the most frequently reported adverse effects. The majority of the adverse reactions were reported with soap (21%), followed by shampoo (17%). The gender-wise difference between adverse effects of skin care products was found to be statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To improve the system's efficiency, a comprehensive review of the current regulatory protocols for cosmetics is crucial. Additionally, it is essential to widely disseminate information on Cosmetovigilance and promote the reporting of any adverse effects of cosmetics within the community; this is the demand of the present time.</p>","PeriodicalId":11451,"journal":{"name":"Drug Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2251-6655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The pursuit of aesthetic attractiveness and increased awareness have contributed significantly to the growth of the cosmetic industry. However, it is crucial to recognize that even the minimal use of cosmetics may have harmful consequences for both the overall well-being and the broader community, an issue that has yet to be adequately recognized or addressed.

Objective: This study is aimed at providing insights into the usage pattern of consumer behavior regarding skin care products and to assess the prevalence and determinants of cosmetic-related adverse events among the general populace.

Materials and methods: A community-based cross-sectional study was carried out for four months in a satellite city of the National Capital Region (NCR) of India. The data from 435 respondents was collected using a self-administered questionnaire and analyzed using frequencies and percentages.

Results: Among 435 participants, 32.9% experienced one or more adverse effects owing to the use of skincare products; the prevalence was higher in females (36.3%). Hair loss, allergies, and dry skin were the most frequently reported adverse effects. The majority of the adverse reactions were reported with soap (21%), followed by shampoo (17%). The gender-wise difference between adverse effects of skin care products was found to be statistically significant.

Conclusion: To improve the system's efficiency, a comprehensive review of the current regulatory protocols for cosmetics is crucial. Additionally, it is essential to widely disseminate information on Cosmetovigilance and promote the reporting of any adverse effects of cosmetics within the community; this is the demand of the present time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
化妆品使用相关不良反应的观察研究:当今化妆品警戒的需要。
导 言对美感的追求和意识的提高极大地促进了化妆品行业的发展。然而,我们必须认识到,即使是极少量使用化妆品,也可能对整体健康和更广泛的社会造成有害影响,而这一问题尚未得到充分认识或解决:本研究旨在深入了解消费者使用护肤品的行为模式,并评估与化妆品有关的不良事件在普通人群中的发生率和决定因素:在印度国家首都地区(NCR)的一个卫星城市开展了一项为期四个月的社区横断面研究。研究采用自填问卷的方式收集了 435 名受访者的数据,并使用频率和百分比对数据进行了分析:结果:在 435 名受访者中,32.9% 的人因使用护肤品而出现过一种或多种不良反应;女性的发生率更高(36.3%)。脱发、过敏和皮肤干燥是最常见的不良反应。大多数不良反应都与肥皂有关(21%),其次是洗发水(17%)。护肤品不良反应的性别差异具有统计学意义:为了提高系统的效率,全面审查当前的化妆品监管规程至关重要。此外,必须广泛传播化妆品警戒信息,促进社区内对化妆品不良反应的报告;这是当前的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Research
Drug Research PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Drug Research (formerly Arzneimittelforschung) is an international peer-reviewed journal with expedited processing times presenting the very latest research results related to novel and established drug molecules and the evaluation of new drug development. A key focus of the publication is translational medicine and the application of biological discoveries in the development of drugs for use in the clinical environment. Articles and experimental data from across the field of drug research address not only the issue of drug discovery, but also the mathematical and statistical methods for evaluating results from industrial investigations and clinical trials. Publishing twelve times a year, Drug Research includes original research articles as well as reviews, commentaries and short communications in the following areas: analytics applied to clinical trials chemistry and biochemistry clinical and experimental pharmacology drug interactions efficacy testing pharmacodynamics pharmacokinetics teratology toxicology.
期刊最新文献
Amputation Risk in Type II Diabetes Mellitus Patients Treated with SGLT-2 Inhibitors: A Systematic Literature Review of Randomized Clinical Trials. Bioflavonoid Daidzein: Therapeutic Insights, Formulation Advances, and Future Directions. Unraveling the Interplay of 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 and N-methyl-d-aspartate Receptors in Seizure Susceptibility. A Comparative Analysis of ADRs under Obeticholic Acid and Ursodeoxycholic Acid in Cholestatic Liver Diseases Using the FAERS Database. Exploring the HPLC Profiling and Antioxidant Potency in Methanolic Extracts of Curcuma longa L. Rhizomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1