Examining cognitive disengagement syndrome in a psychiatric outpatient sample: Psychometric support and associations with internalizing symptoms and sleep problems

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Clinical Psychology Pub Date : 2024-03-11 DOI:10.1002/jclp.23678
Bengu Yucens, Omer Basay, Ahmet Buber, Selim Tumkaya, Burge Kabukcu Basay, Busra Erdem, Stephen P. Becker, G. Leonard Burns
{"title":"Examining cognitive disengagement syndrome in a psychiatric outpatient sample: Psychometric support and associations with internalizing symptoms and sleep problems","authors":"Bengu Yucens,&nbsp;Omer Basay,&nbsp;Ahmet Buber,&nbsp;Selim Tumkaya,&nbsp;Burge Kabukcu Basay,&nbsp;Busra Erdem,&nbsp;Stephen P. Becker,&nbsp;G. Leonard Burns","doi":"10.1002/jclp.23678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The internal (structural) and external validity of a self-report measure of cognitive disengagement syndrome (CDS, formerly sluggish cognitive tempo) relative to a self-report measure of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder-inattention (ADHD-IN) was evaluated with adults from university outpatient psychiatric clinics in Turkey.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 274 outpatients (75.9% women; ages 18–64 years; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 31.06; SD<sub>age</sub> = 10.84; 50.4% anxiety disorders; 41.6% depressive disorders; 2.9% ADHD; 1.5% sleep disorders; 0.7% eating disorders; 2.9% no mental disorder) completed self-report measures of CDS, ADHD-IN, ADHD-hyperactivity/impulsivity (HI), sleep problems, depression, and stress.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All 15 CDS symptoms measured by the Adult Concentration Inventory (ACI) showed convergent (moderate to high loadings on the CDS factor) and discriminant (loading close to zero on the ADHD-IN factor) validity. CDS also showed stronger first-order and unique associations than ADHD-IN with sleep problems, depression, anxiety, and stress, whereas ADHD-IN showed stronger first-order and unique associations than CDS with ADHD-HI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This is the first study to provide support for the scores from this 15 item self-report measure of CDS by the ACI in a clinical sample of adults, with findings consistent with previous studies examining parent and teacher rating scale measures with the same 15 CDS symptoms. These findings provide additional support for usefulness of these 15 CDS symptoms as measured by the ACI to study CDS across various cultures.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jclp.23678","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jclp.23678","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The internal (structural) and external validity of a self-report measure of cognitive disengagement syndrome (CDS, formerly sluggish cognitive tempo) relative to a self-report measure of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder-inattention (ADHD-IN) was evaluated with adults from university outpatient psychiatric clinics in Turkey.

Methods

A total of 274 outpatients (75.9% women; ages 18–64 years; Mage = 31.06; SDage = 10.84; 50.4% anxiety disorders; 41.6% depressive disorders; 2.9% ADHD; 1.5% sleep disorders; 0.7% eating disorders; 2.9% no mental disorder) completed self-report measures of CDS, ADHD-IN, ADHD-hyperactivity/impulsivity (HI), sleep problems, depression, and stress.

Results

All 15 CDS symptoms measured by the Adult Concentration Inventory (ACI) showed convergent (moderate to high loadings on the CDS factor) and discriminant (loading close to zero on the ADHD-IN factor) validity. CDS also showed stronger first-order and unique associations than ADHD-IN with sleep problems, depression, anxiety, and stress, whereas ADHD-IN showed stronger first-order and unique associations than CDS with ADHD-HI.

Conclusion

This is the first study to provide support for the scores from this 15 item self-report measure of CDS by the ACI in a clinical sample of adults, with findings consistent with previous studies examining parent and teacher rating scale measures with the same 15 CDS symptoms. These findings provide additional support for usefulness of these 15 CDS symptoms as measured by the ACI to study CDS across various cultures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在精神病门诊病人样本中研究认知脱离综合征:心理计量学支持以及与内化症状和睡眠问题的关联。
目的以土耳其大学精神科门诊的成年人为研究对象,评估了认知脱离综合征(CDS,原认知节奏迟缓)自我报告测量法与注意力缺陷/多动障碍-注意力(ADHD-IN)自我报告测量法的内部(结构)和外部有效性:共有 274 名门诊患者(75.9% 为女性;年龄 18-64 岁;Mage = 31.06;SDage = 10.84;50.4% 患有焦虑症;41.6% 患有抑郁症;2.9% 患有多动症;1.5% 患有睡眠障碍;0.7% 患有饮食障碍;2.9% 无精神障碍)完成了 CDS、ADHD-IN、ADHD-多动/冲动(HI)、睡眠问题、抑郁和压力的自我报告测量:通过成人注意力集中量表(ACI)测量的所有 15 个 CDS 症状均显示出收敛性(在 CDS 因子上有中等至较高的负荷)和判别性(在 ADHD-IN 因子上的负荷接近零)。CDS还比ADHD-IN与睡眠问题、抑郁、焦虑和压力表现出更强的一阶和独特关联,而ADHD-IN则比CDS与ADHD-HI表现出更强的一阶和独特关联:这是第一项支持 ACI 在临床成人样本中对 15 项 CDS 症状进行自我报告测量的研究,其结果与之前对家长和教师对同样 15 项 CDS 症状进行评分的研究结果一致。这些研究结果为 ACI 测量的这 15 项 CDS 症状在研究不同文化背景下的 CDS 方面的实用性提供了更多支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Journal of Clinical Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.30%
发文量
177
期刊介绍: Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.
期刊最新文献
Moving beyond vulnerability and focusing on resilience: An intersectional posttraumatic growth model for LGBTQ+ people of color. Introduction to In Session special issue: Psychotherapy for complex PTSD Associations between avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder profiles and trauma exposure in veteran men and women Issue Information Clinical psychology, social identities and societal challenges: Implications for diversity-sensitive practice and training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1