Current status of tertiary healthcare services and its accessibility in rural and remote Australia: A systematic review

Mazen Baazeem , Estie Kruger , Marc Tennant
{"title":"Current status of tertiary healthcare services and its accessibility in rural and remote Australia: A systematic review","authors":"Mazen Baazeem ,&nbsp;Estie Kruger ,&nbsp;Marc Tennant","doi":"10.1016/j.hsr.2024.100158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study evaluated the current state and accessibility of tertiary healthcare services in rural Australia. A systematic literature review from 2010 to 2022 was undertaken, utilising databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, and Google Scholar. The PRISMA method was employed to retrieve an initial total of 4768 papers. Upon removal of 2806 duplicates and 1587 irrelevant records, 1962 articles were screened. From these, 375 were assessed for eligibility, leading to the inclusion of eleven studies in the systematic review. Criteria for exclusion included a focus on primary and secondary healthcare, absence of peer review, and unclear methodology.</p><p>A collective survey of 230,339 individuals, focusing on access to tertiary healthcare in rural and remote areas of Australia, was reported in the chosen studies. Several barriers to healthcare access for rural populations were identified, including lack of informed leadership, inadequate clinical governance, limited awareness of modern care models, suboptimal workforce planning and resource utilisation, incorrect risk perception, and insufficient community engagement.</p><p>In conclusion, there is an urgent need to address healthcare disparities and improve service accessibility in Australia's rural and remote areas.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73214,"journal":{"name":"Health sciences review (Oxford, England)","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772632024000114/pdfft?md5=a8e3569a392efe80df6faae087c7415c&pid=1-s2.0-S2772632024000114-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health sciences review (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772632024000114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study evaluated the current state and accessibility of tertiary healthcare services in rural Australia. A systematic literature review from 2010 to 2022 was undertaken, utilising databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, and Google Scholar. The PRISMA method was employed to retrieve an initial total of 4768 papers. Upon removal of 2806 duplicates and 1587 irrelevant records, 1962 articles were screened. From these, 375 were assessed for eligibility, leading to the inclusion of eleven studies in the systematic review. Criteria for exclusion included a focus on primary and secondary healthcare, absence of peer review, and unclear methodology.

A collective survey of 230,339 individuals, focusing on access to tertiary healthcare in rural and remote areas of Australia, was reported in the chosen studies. Several barriers to healthcare access for rural populations were identified, including lack of informed leadership, inadequate clinical governance, limited awareness of modern care models, suboptimal workforce planning and resource utilisation, incorrect risk perception, and insufficient community engagement.

In conclusion, there is an urgent need to address healthcare disparities and improve service accessibility in Australia's rural and remote areas.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚农村和偏远地区三级医疗服务的现状及其可及性:系统回顾
该研究评估了澳大利亚农村地区三级医疗保健服务的现状和可及性。研究利用 PubMed、MEDLINE、Cochrane Library、ProQuest 和 Google Scholar 等数据库,对 2010 年至 2022 年期间的文献进行了系统性回顾。我们采用了 PRISMA 方法,初步检索到 4768 篇论文。在删除了 2806 条重复记录和 1587 条无关记录后,筛选出 1962 篇文章。其中有 375 篇文章通过了资格评估,最终有 11 项研究被纳入系统性综述。所选研究报告对 230,339 人进行了集体调查,重点关注澳大利亚农村和偏远地区三级医疗保健的获取情况。总之,澳大利亚农村和偏远地区急需解决医疗差距问题,并改善服务的可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health sciences review (Oxford, England)
Health sciences review (Oxford, England) Medicine and Dentistry (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
75 days
期刊最新文献
Network pharmacology and in silico investigation into the therapeutic potential of phytoconstituents of Peucedanum ostruthium as anti-tubercular agents Barriers to timely diagnosis and management of breast cancer in Africa: Implications for improved outcomes Early versus late surgical stabilisation of unstable thoracolumbar spine fractures in adult polytrauma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis Emotion-Induced Memory Distortions: Insights from Deese-Roediger-McDermott and Misinformation Paradigms—A Comprehensive Review Introducing the “Gamechanger“ - Myoreflextherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1