DNA from dives: Species detection of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) from flukeprint eDNA

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Environmental DNA Pub Date : 2024-03-12 DOI:10.1002/edn3.524
Chloe V. Robinson, Karina Dracott, Robin D. Glover, Adam Warner, Amy Migneault
{"title":"DNA from dives: Species detection of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) from flukeprint eDNA","authors":"Chloe V. Robinson,&nbsp;Karina Dracott,&nbsp;Robin D. Glover,&nbsp;Adam Warner,&nbsp;Amy Migneault","doi":"10.1002/edn3.524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Northern British Columbia has been identified as an important habitat for several coastal cetacean species, including humpback whales (<i>Megaptera novaeangliae</i>). This species is listed as being of “Special Concern” under Canada's Species at Risk Act, partly due to data deficiencies concerning genetic population structure and demographics in British Columbia. Anthropogenic activities threaten North Coast humpback whale populations, with particular concern for the impact of vessel noise, entanglement, and ship strikes. Current methodology (i.e., biopsy sampling) for obtaining cetacean genetic data is invasive, challenging, and costly; therefore, there is an urgency to develop effective and minimally invasive methodologies for efficiently collecting this data. Environmental DNA (eDNA) has been identified as an ideal tool for monitoring the presence and distribution of numerous species within marine ecosystems; however, the feasibility for cetaceans is not yet well established. In this study, we opportunistically collected targeted 1 L seawater eDNA samples from flukeprints when individual humpback whales were observed diving between the years of 2020 and 2022. A total of 93 samples were collected from individual humpback whales identified using a photographic identification catalogue. We successfully detected humpback whale eDNA in 28 samples using novel species-specific qPCR primers (~500 mL of sample), with relatively equal successful detection between immediate (0 days) and delayed (up to 10 days) sample filtration. Here, we have validated a qPCR assay for detecting humpback whale DNA from flukeprints and highlighted the future optimizations required to improve the potential application of flukeprint eDNA for conservation management.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.524","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Northern British Columbia has been identified as an important habitat for several coastal cetacean species, including humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae). This species is listed as being of “Special Concern” under Canada's Species at Risk Act, partly due to data deficiencies concerning genetic population structure and demographics in British Columbia. Anthropogenic activities threaten North Coast humpback whale populations, with particular concern for the impact of vessel noise, entanglement, and ship strikes. Current methodology (i.e., biopsy sampling) for obtaining cetacean genetic data is invasive, challenging, and costly; therefore, there is an urgency to develop effective and minimally invasive methodologies for efficiently collecting this data. Environmental DNA (eDNA) has been identified as an ideal tool for monitoring the presence and distribution of numerous species within marine ecosystems; however, the feasibility for cetaceans is not yet well established. In this study, we opportunistically collected targeted 1 L seawater eDNA samples from flukeprints when individual humpback whales were observed diving between the years of 2020 and 2022. A total of 93 samples were collected from individual humpback whales identified using a photographic identification catalogue. We successfully detected humpback whale eDNA in 28 samples using novel species-specific qPCR primers (~500 mL of sample), with relatively equal successful detection between immediate (0 days) and delayed (up to 10 days) sample filtration. Here, we have validated a qPCR assay for detecting humpback whale DNA from flukeprints and highlighted the future optimizations required to improve the potential application of flukeprint eDNA for conservation management.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从潜水中提取 DNA:从绒毛膜电子 DNA 检测座头鲸(Megaptera novaeangliae)的种类
不列颠哥伦比亚省北部已被确定为包括座头鲸(Megaptera novaeangliae)在内的几种沿海鲸目动物的重要栖息地。根据加拿大《濒危物种法》,该物种被列为 "特别关注 "物种,部分原因是不列颠哥伦比亚省的遗传种群结构和人口统计数据不足。人类活动威胁着北海岸座头鲸种群,尤其是船只噪音、缠绕和船只撞击的影响。目前获取鲸目动物基因数据的方法(即活检取样)具有侵入性、挑战性和高成本的特点;因此,迫切需要开发有效且侵入性最小的方法来高效地收集这些数据。环境 DNA(eDNA)已被认为是监测海洋生态系统中众多物种的存在和分布的理想工具;然而,其对鲸目动物的可行性尚未得到很好的证实。在本研究中,我们在 2020 年至 2022 年期间观察到座头鲸个体下潜时,伺机从它们的鳍印中采集了 1 L 的目标海水 eDNA 样本。通过照片识别目录,我们从座头鲸个体身上共采集了 93 个样本。我们使用新型物种特异性 qPCR 引物(约 500 mL 样品)在 28 个样本中成功检测到座头鲸 eDNA,在样本立即过滤(0 天)和延迟过滤(长达 10 天)之间的成功检测率相对相当。在此,我们验证了一种从吸虫印迹中检测座头鲸 DNA 的 qPCR 分析方法,并强调了未来需要进行的优化,以提高吸虫印迹 eDNA 在保护管理中的潜在应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Bottom Trawling and Multi-Marker eDNA Metabarcoding Surveys Reveal Highly Diverse Vertebrate and Crustacean Communities: A Case Study in an Urbanized Subtropical Estuary Evaluation of a Nanopore Sequencing Strategy on Bacterial Communities From Marine Sediments Current Trends in Biophysical Modeling of eDNA Dynamics for the Detection of Marine Species Validation of Environmental DNA for Estimating Proportional and Absolute Biomass
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1