首页 > 最新文献

Environmental DNA最新文献

英文 中文
Tails of Biodiversity: Vertebrate Community Assessment in a Neotropical River Basin via eDNA Metabarcoding 生物多样性的尾巴:基于eDNA元条形码的新热带河流流域脊椎动物群落评估
IF 6.2 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1002/edn3.70230
Larissa Moreira-Silva, Rennan Garcias Moreira, Jim Perry, Walisson Kenedy-Siqueira, Guilherme Costa Baião, Daniel Negreiros, Fernando Figueiredo Goulart, Josimar Daniel Gomes, Geraldo Wilson Fernandes

Located in the southeast of Brazil, the Rio Santo Antônio basin, a tributary of the Rio Doce basin, has many preserved remnants of the Atlantic Forest, but is otherwise under imminent threats from several land use stressors. In this study, we used environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding to assess vertebrate diversity in the headwaters of the Rio Santo Antônio basin, aiming to elucidate key ecological factors influencing its vertebrate richness. Additionally, we provide the first vertebrate species inventory for the basin. In 2023, water samples from 15 third- and fourth-order streams were collected and metabarcoding assays targeting the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene were employed to detect the vertebrate community. We identified 119 vertebrate taxonomic units distributed across two distinct communities: one on the eastern slope and another on the western slope of the basin, both influenced by large-scale mining activities. We demonstrated that vertebrate richness was not correlated with forest cover or pH but was strongly associated with the water's oxidation–reduction potential (ORP). We interpret ORP as a reflection of local conditions, where sites with higher ORP values also exhibited greater taxonomic richness and were related to greater forest cover, lower air and water temperatures, and greater distance from mining activity. The vertebrate biodiversity and biogeographic distribution described here highlight the value of eDNA metabarcoding as a monitoring approach and support decision-making and conservation efforts aimed at preserving the remaining Atlantic Forest in the headwaters of the Rio Santo Antônio basin.

里约热内卢Santo Antônio盆地位于巴西东南部,是里约热内卢Doce盆地的一条支流,拥有许多保存完好的大西洋森林遗迹,但也面临着一些土地利用压力因素的迫在眉睫的威胁。本研究采用环境DNA (environmental DNA, eDNA)元条形码技术对里约热内卢Santo Antônio流域上游的脊椎动物多样性进行了评估,旨在阐明影响其脊椎动物丰富度的关键生态因素。此外,我们还提供了该盆地的第一个脊椎动物物种清单。2023年,采集了15条三、四级溪流的水样,采用针对线粒体12S rRNA基因的元条形码检测脊椎动物群落。我们鉴定出119种脊椎动物分类单位分布在两个不同的群落中:一个在盆地的东斜坡上,另一个在盆地的西斜坡上,两者都受到大规模采矿活动的影响。研究表明,脊椎动物丰富度与森林覆盖或pH值无关,但与水的氧化还原电位(ORP)密切相关。我们将ORP解释为当地条件的反映,高ORP值的地点也表现出更大的分类丰富度,并且与更大的森林覆盖,更低的空气和水温以及更远离采矿活动有关。这里描述的脊椎动物多样性和生物地理分布突出了eDNA元条形码作为一种监测方法的价值,并支持旨在保护里约热内卢Santo Antônio盆地上游剩余大西洋森林的决策和保护工作。
{"title":"Tails of Biodiversity: Vertebrate Community Assessment in a Neotropical River Basin via eDNA Metabarcoding","authors":"Larissa Moreira-Silva,&nbsp;Rennan Garcias Moreira,&nbsp;Jim Perry,&nbsp;Walisson Kenedy-Siqueira,&nbsp;Guilherme Costa Baião,&nbsp;Daniel Negreiros,&nbsp;Fernando Figueiredo Goulart,&nbsp;Josimar Daniel Gomes,&nbsp;Geraldo Wilson Fernandes","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70230","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70230","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Located in the southeast of Brazil, the Rio Santo Antônio basin, a tributary of the Rio Doce basin, has many preserved remnants of the Atlantic Forest, but is otherwise under imminent threats from several land use stressors. In this study, we used environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding to assess vertebrate diversity in the headwaters of the Rio Santo Antônio basin, aiming to elucidate key ecological factors influencing its vertebrate richness. Additionally, we provide the first vertebrate species inventory for the basin. In 2023, water samples from 15 third- and fourth-order streams were collected and metabarcoding assays targeting the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene were employed to detect the vertebrate community. We identified 119 vertebrate taxonomic units distributed across two distinct communities: one on the eastern slope and another on the western slope of the basin, both influenced by large-scale mining activities. We demonstrated that vertebrate richness was not correlated with forest cover or pH but was strongly associated with the water's oxidation–reduction potential (ORP). We interpret ORP as a reflection of local conditions, where sites with higher ORP values also exhibited greater taxonomic richness and were related to greater forest cover, lower air and water temperatures, and greater distance from mining activity. The vertebrate biodiversity and biogeographic distribution described here highlight the value of eDNA metabarcoding as a monitoring approach and support decision-making and conservation efforts aimed at preserving the remaining Atlantic Forest in the headwaters of the Rio Santo Antônio basin.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70230","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145916017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mosquito iDNA Reflects Fine Scale Composition of Tropical Fauna 蚊子的dna反映了热带动物的精细尺度组成
IF 6.2 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2025-12-09 DOI: 10.1002/edn3.70227
Christine Chivas, Thomas J. Mooney, Adam Stow, Andrew J. Harford, David Loewensteiner, Kate Montgomery, Anthony Chariton

Changes in fire regimes and the introduction of invasive species are negatively impacting Northern Australia's biota, highlighting the need for reliable biodiversity monitoring data. Here we used mosquito-ingested DNA (iDNA) to detect birds and mammals within Kakadu National Park. Six sites were sampled on two occasions (wet and dry season), with three traps deployed for two consecutive nights of sampling at each site. Mosquitoes were processed in bulk samples per trap ranging from 31 to 1987 mosquitoes. Extracted DNA was amplified using primers targeting vertebrates (12SV5), mammals (16SMam1/2) and birds (Aves01) with iDNA-derived richness and composition measured. A total of 50 avian and 19 mammalian taxa were detected, including threatened species such as the white-throated grasswren (Amytornis woodwardi) and the ghost bat (Macroderma gigas), along with difficult-to-monitor groups such as small-bodied and arboreal mammals. Community composition was shown to be distinct between sampling events, and avian richness was higher during the dry season. Importantly for the management of the park, our findings suggest that fire regimes modified both bird and mammal communities during the dry season, with vegetation structure being correlated with avian and mammalian community composition during the wet season. This study highlights the capacity for iDNA metabarcoding to provide fine-scale ecologically relevant information within a large, dynamic and difficult-to-access landscape.

火灾制度的变化和入侵物种的引入对北澳大利亚的生物群产生了负面影响,突出了对可靠的生物多样性监测数据的需求。在这里,我们使用蚊子摄取的DNA (iDNA)来检测卡卡杜国家公园内的鸟类和哺乳动物。在六个地点进行了两次采样(湿季和干季),在每个地点部署了三个陷阱,连续两晚采样。每个捕蚊器处理的蚊子样本为31只至1987只。利用引物对提取的DNA进行扩增,这些引物分别针对脊椎动物(12SV5)、哺乳动物(16SMam1/2)和鸟类(Aves01),并测量DNA来源的丰富度和组成。共检测到50种鸟类和19种哺乳动物分类,包括濒危物种,如白喉草鹪鹩(Amytornis woodwardi)和鬼蝠(Macroderma gigas),以及难以监测的类群,如小体和树栖哺乳动物。群落组成在不同采样事件之间存在差异,鸟类丰富度在旱季较高。对于公园的管理来说,重要的是,我们的研究结果表明,在旱季,火灾制度改变了鸟类和哺乳动物群落,而在雨季,植被结构与鸟类和哺乳动物群落组成相关。这项研究强调了dna元条形码在一个大的、动态的和难以获取的景观中提供精细尺度的生态相关信息的能力。
{"title":"Mosquito iDNA Reflects Fine Scale Composition of Tropical Fauna","authors":"Christine Chivas,&nbsp;Thomas J. Mooney,&nbsp;Adam Stow,&nbsp;Andrew J. Harford,&nbsp;David Loewensteiner,&nbsp;Kate Montgomery,&nbsp;Anthony Chariton","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70227","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70227","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Changes in fire regimes and the introduction of invasive species are negatively impacting Northern Australia's biota, highlighting the need for reliable biodiversity monitoring data. Here we used mosquito-ingested DNA (iDNA) to detect birds and mammals within Kakadu National Park. Six sites were sampled on two occasions (wet and dry season), with three traps deployed for two consecutive nights of sampling at each site. Mosquitoes were processed in bulk samples per trap ranging from 31 to 1987 mosquitoes. Extracted DNA was amplified using primers targeting vertebrates (12SV5), mammals (16SMam1/2) and birds (Aves01) with iDNA-derived richness and composition measured. A total of 50 avian and 19 mammalian taxa were detected, including threatened species such as the white-throated grasswren (<i>Amytornis woodwardi</i>) and the ghost bat (<i>Macroderma gigas</i>), along with difficult-to-monitor groups such as small-bodied and arboreal mammals. Community composition was shown to be distinct between sampling events, and avian richness was higher during the dry season. Importantly for the management of the park, our findings suggest that fire regimes modified both bird and mammal communities during the dry season, with vegetation structure being correlated with avian and mammalian community composition during the wet season. This study highlights the capacity for iDNA metabarcoding to provide fine-scale ecologically relevant information within a large, dynamic and difficult-to-access landscape.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70227","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145751005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Validating Airborne eDNA Using Manual Surveys, Acoustic Monitoring and Camera Traps to Detect Birds and Mammals in an Agroforestry Setting 验证机载eDNA使用人工调查,声学监测和相机陷阱检测鸟类和哺乳动物在农林业设置
IF 6.2 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2025-12-04 DOI: 10.1002/edn3.70222
F. E. M. Warmer, M. Polling, R. Buij, I. Laros, T. Visser, G. A. de Groot

Global loss of biodiversity prioritizes the need for comprehensive and effective biomonitoring methods. Airborne environmental DNA (eDNA) has shown promise for monitoring terrestrial vertebrates but has not yet been rigorously compared to established biomonitoring methods. In a field-study in the Netherlands, this study aims to compare species detection from airborne eDNA with manual surveys, camera trapping and acoustic monitoring, focusing on birds and mammals. Monitoring was performed over the course of 4 weeks within an agroforestry ecosystem. Birds were monitored using eDNA, manual surveys and acoustic monitoring, while eDNA and camera trapping were used for mammals. This resulted in four mammal species, detected by both camera traps and eDNA, while eDNA identified an additional 16 species, primarily small-bodied, including two invasive species. A total of 74 bird species was detected, with varying degrees of overlap between methods and all three methods detected unique species. All but three bird and four mammal species detected were consistent with known occurrences near the study site. Rarefaction curves show that eDNA has the highest potential species diversity, but manual surveys are most efficient when limited time is available. Unique species can largely be explained by method characteristics or limitations; acoustic monitoring detections are limited to species that make sound, while eDNA requires further research on detection range and sensitivity. Our results indicate that for the studied agroforestry system, acoustic monitoring and airborne eDNA can detect a large proportion of birds and mammals detected by manual surveys, in addition to a range of species undetected by the latter, attesting to their effectiveness as biodiversity monitoring methods. This is the first study to compare airborne eDNA with manual surveys and acoustic data, further confirming the high potential of airborne eDNA for biodiversity monitoring.

全球生物多样性的丧失优先需要全面和有效的生物监测方法。空气环境DNA (eDNA)已显示出监测陆生脊椎动物的前景,但尚未与已建立的生物监测方法进行严格比较。在荷兰的一项实地研究中,这项研究旨在比较空气中eDNA的物种检测与人工调查、相机捕获和声学监测,重点是鸟类和哺乳动物。在一个农林复合生态系统内进行了为期4周的监测。鸟类采用eDNA、人工调查和声学监测进行监测,哺乳动物采用eDNA和相机诱捕法进行监测。这导致了四种哺乳动物物种,由相机陷阱和eDNA检测到,而eDNA鉴定了另外16种,主要是小型动物,包括两种入侵物种。共检测到鸟类74种,三种方法之间存在不同程度的重叠,且均检测到特有物种。除了三种鸟类和四种哺乳动物外,所有检测到的物种都与研究地点附近已知的物种一致。稀疏曲线显示eDNA具有最高的潜在物种多样性,但在时间有限的情况下,人工调查是最有效的。独特的物种在很大程度上可以用方法特征或局限性来解释;声学监测检测仅限于发出声音的物种,eDNA的检测范围和灵敏度有待进一步研究。我们的研究结果表明,对于所研究的农林复合系统,声学监测和空气eDNA可以检测到大部分通过人工调查检测到的鸟类和哺乳动物,以及后者无法检测到的一系列物种,证明了它们作为生物多样性监测方法的有效性。这是第一个将空气eDNA与人工调查和声学数据进行比较的研究,进一步证实了空气eDNA在生物多样性监测方面的巨大潜力。
{"title":"Validating Airborne eDNA Using Manual Surveys, Acoustic Monitoring and Camera Traps to Detect Birds and Mammals in an Agroforestry Setting","authors":"F. E. M. Warmer,&nbsp;M. Polling,&nbsp;R. Buij,&nbsp;I. Laros,&nbsp;T. Visser,&nbsp;G. A. de Groot","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70222","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70222","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Global loss of biodiversity prioritizes the need for comprehensive and effective biomonitoring methods. Airborne environmental DNA (eDNA) has shown promise for monitoring terrestrial vertebrates but has not yet been rigorously compared to established biomonitoring methods. In a field-study in the Netherlands, this study aims to compare species detection from airborne eDNA with manual surveys, camera trapping and acoustic monitoring, focusing on birds and mammals. Monitoring was performed over the course of 4 weeks within an agroforestry ecosystem. Birds were monitored using eDNA, manual surveys and acoustic monitoring, while eDNA and camera trapping were used for mammals. This resulted in four mammal species, detected by both camera traps and eDNA, while eDNA identified an additional 16 species, primarily small-bodied, including two invasive species. A total of 74 bird species was detected, with varying degrees of overlap between methods and all three methods detected unique species. All but three bird and four mammal species detected were consistent with known occurrences near the study site. Rarefaction curves show that eDNA has the highest potential species diversity, but manual surveys are most efficient when limited time is available. Unique species can largely be explained by method characteristics or limitations; acoustic monitoring detections are limited to species that make sound, while eDNA requires further research on detection range and sensitivity. Our results indicate that for the studied agroforestry system, acoustic monitoring and airborne eDNA can detect a large proportion of birds and mammals detected by manual surveys, in addition to a range of species undetected by the latter, attesting to their effectiveness as biodiversity monitoring methods. This is the first study to compare airborne eDNA with manual surveys and acoustic data, further confirming the high potential of airborne eDNA for biodiversity monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70222","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145695272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Tunneling Dung Beetle Effects on Soil Microbial Communities and Nutrient Cycling in Pasturelands: Implications for Soil Carbon Dynamics 隧道蜣螂对草地土壤微生物群落和养分循环的影响:对土壤碳动态的影响
IF 6.2 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2025-11-30 DOI: 10.1002/edn3.70228
Suzanne Lipton, Rachel S. Meyer, Kate M. Scow, Ariel L. Simons, Stacy M. Philpott

Intensifying the management of grazed pasturelands can lead to higher greenhouse gas emissions, loss of biodiversity, and a general decline in ecosystem function. Yet, maintaining the abundance and activity of soil organisms, such as dung beetles, in pasturelands may improve soil ecosystem function. The tunneling dung beetle, Onthophagus taurus (Schreber 1759) buries dung in the soil, affecting soil physical properties, the soil microbial community, as well as nutrient cycling. However, few studies have examined links between dung-beetle-mediated changes in soil microbes and soil organic carbon. We used a 60-day enclosure experiment to examine how O. taurus affects the soil microbial community and soil organic carbon in pasturelands of California's Central Coast, and to examine whether any observed changes in the soil microbial community are beetle abundance-dependent. Using eDNA metabarcoding of the prokaryote 16S and fungal ITS1 loci, we find that dung beetles affect the soil bacterial community only within surface soils (top 0–1 cm), whereas their presence affects the fungal community in both surface soils and in 0–10 cm cores. We also found that the fungal taxa more likely to occur in the presence of dung beetles are associated with carbon cycling. Despite these relationships, neither the presence nor abundance of dung beetles in pastureland soils had an impact on soil carbon content in the time of this experiment. Our results illuminate the influences of dung beetles on the soil microbial community and nutrient cycling in pastureland soils which can have broad-reaching implications for ranchers and land managers.

加强对放牧牧场的管理可能导致温室气体排放增加、生物多样性丧失和生态系统功能普遍下降。然而,保持牧场土壤生物(如屎壳郎)的丰度和活性可能会改善土壤生态系统功能。隧道屎壳郎Onthophagus taurus (Schreber 1759)将粪埋在土壤中,影响土壤的物理性质、土壤微生物群落以及养分循环。然而,很少有研究调查粪甲虫介导的土壤微生物变化与土壤有机碳之间的联系。本文通过60天的围封实验,研究了金牛对加利福尼亚中部海岸牧场土壤微生物群落和土壤有机碳的影响,并研究了土壤微生物群落的变化是否与甲虫丰度有关。利用原核生物16S位点和真菌ITS1位点的eDNA元条形码,我们发现蜣螂只影响表层土壤(顶部0-1 cm)的细菌群落,而它们的存在对表层土壤和0-10 cm核心的真菌群落都有影响。我们还发现,真菌分类群更有可能在屎壳郎存在的情况下发生,这与碳循环有关。尽管存在这些关系,但在本实验期间,牧场土壤中屎壳郎的存在或丰度对土壤碳含量都没有影响。我们的研究结果阐明了蜣螂对牧场土壤微生物群落和养分循环的影响,对牧场主和土地管理者具有广泛的指导意义。
{"title":"Tunneling Dung Beetle Effects on Soil Microbial Communities and Nutrient Cycling in Pasturelands: Implications for Soil Carbon Dynamics","authors":"Suzanne Lipton,&nbsp;Rachel S. Meyer,&nbsp;Kate M. Scow,&nbsp;Ariel L. Simons,&nbsp;Stacy M. Philpott","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70228","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70228","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Intensifying the management of grazed pasturelands can lead to higher greenhouse gas emissions, loss of biodiversity, and a general decline in ecosystem function. Yet, maintaining the abundance and activity of soil organisms, such as dung beetles, in pasturelands may improve soil ecosystem function. The tunneling dung beetle, <i>Onthophagus taurus</i> (Schreber 1759) buries dung in the soil, affecting soil physical properties, the soil microbial community, as well as nutrient cycling. However, few studies have examined links between dung-beetle-mediated changes in soil microbes and soil organic carbon. We used a 60-day enclosure experiment to examine how <i>O. taurus</i> affects the soil microbial community and soil organic carbon in pasturelands of California's Central Coast, and to examine whether any observed changes in the soil microbial community are beetle abundance-dependent. Using eDNA metabarcoding of the prokaryote <i>16S</i> and fungal <i>ITS1</i> loci, we find that dung beetles affect the soil bacterial community only within surface soils (top 0–1 cm), whereas their presence affects the fungal community in both surface soils and in 0–10 cm cores. We also found that the fungal taxa more likely to occur in the presence of dung beetles are associated with carbon cycling. Despite these relationships, neither the presence nor abundance of dung beetles in pastureland soils had an impact on soil carbon content in the time of this experiment. Our results illuminate the influences of dung beetles on the soil microbial community and nutrient cycling in pastureland soils which can have broad-reaching implications for ranchers and land managers.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70228","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145695577","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optimal Environmental DNA Sampling Strategy for Comprehensively Assessing Biodiversity in Rice Paddy Fields 稻田生物多样性综合评价的最佳环境DNA采样策略
IF 6.2 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2025-11-28 DOI: 10.1002/edn3.70224
Satoshi Yamamoto, Naoki Katayama, Junsuke Yamasako, Kenji Ito, Satoru Okubo, Yuki G. Baba

Irrigated paddy fields provide alternative habitats for aquatic species amid degrading natural wetland habitats. Paddy field biodiversity depends on surrounding landscapes and agricultural practices, and biodiversity surveys are important in understanding it. However, its assessment is often time-consuming and depends on specialist skills. To overcome these limitations, we used environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding of paddy water samples to detect species diversity of insects, fishes, and birds, and assessed the optimal sampling effort and sampling design. From each of seven paddy fields, we collected samples at each of eight positions. eDNA metabarcoding detected 118 insect, 14 fish, and 6 bird operational taxonomic units, most of them aquatic. Resampling analyzes suggested that four sampling replicates can recover all detectable operational taxonomic units of fishes and birds with > 50% probability, but the species accumulation curves suggested greater insect diversity than we detected, attributable to insufficient reference data. Samples collected near inlets included eDNA from irrigation channels, so inlets should be avoided in assessing biodiversity in paddy fields. Pooled samples could detect abundant species, but the samples detected fewer species than the total species diversity detected from eight sampling replications. Our findings are applicable to most paddies in Japan because the research was conducted in Japanese standard rectangular paddies. Moreover, given the prevalence of small agricultural fields in many Asian countries, our findings will promote the use of eDNA in biodiversity monitoring in paddy fields.

在退化的天然湿地生境中,水田灌溉为水生物种提供了替代栖息地。水田生物多样性取决于周围的景观和农业实践,生物多样性调查对了解水田生物多样性具有重要意义。然而,它的评估往往是耗时的,并取决于专业技能。为了克服这些局限性,我们利用稻田水样的环境DNA (eDNA)元条形码检测昆虫、鱼类和鸟类的物种多样性,并评估了最佳采样努力和采样设计。在7块稻田中,我们分别在8个位置采集样本。eDNA元条形码检测到118种昆虫、14种鱼类和6种鸟类的操作分类单位,其中大部分是水生动物。重新采样分析表明,4次采样重复能以50%的概率恢复所有可检测到的鱼类和鸟类的操作分类单位,但由于参考数据不足,物种积累曲线显示昆虫的多样性比我们检测到的要大。在水源附近采集的样本中含有来自灌溉渠道的eDNA,因此在评估水田生物多样性时应避开水源。合并后的样品可以检测到丰富的物种,但样品检测到的物种数量少于8个采样重复检测到的物种总数。我们的研究结果适用于日本的大多数稻田,因为研究是在日本标准的矩形稻田中进行的。此外,鉴于亚洲许多国家普遍存在小农田,我们的研究结果将促进eDNA在水田生物多样性监测中的应用。
{"title":"Optimal Environmental DNA Sampling Strategy for Comprehensively Assessing Biodiversity in Rice Paddy Fields","authors":"Satoshi Yamamoto,&nbsp;Naoki Katayama,&nbsp;Junsuke Yamasako,&nbsp;Kenji Ito,&nbsp;Satoru Okubo,&nbsp;Yuki G. Baba","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70224","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70224","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Irrigated paddy fields provide alternative habitats for aquatic species amid degrading natural wetland habitats. Paddy field biodiversity depends on surrounding landscapes and agricultural practices, and biodiversity surveys are important in understanding it. However, its assessment is often time-consuming and depends on specialist skills. To overcome these limitations, we used environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding of paddy water samples to detect species diversity of insects, fishes, and birds, and assessed the optimal sampling effort and sampling design. From each of seven paddy fields, we collected samples at each of eight positions. eDNA metabarcoding detected 118 insect, 14 fish, and 6 bird operational taxonomic units, most of them aquatic. Resampling analyzes suggested that four sampling replicates can recover all detectable operational taxonomic units of fishes and birds with &gt; 50% probability, but the species accumulation curves suggested greater insect diversity than we detected, attributable to insufficient reference data. Samples collected near inlets included eDNA from irrigation channels, so inlets should be avoided in assessing biodiversity in paddy fields. Pooled samples could detect abundant species, but the samples detected fewer species than the total species diversity detected from eight sampling replications. Our findings are applicable to most paddies in Japan because the research was conducted in Japanese standard rectangular paddies. Moreover, given the prevalence of small agricultural fields in many Asian countries, our findings will promote the use of eDNA in biodiversity monitoring in paddy fields.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70224","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145619343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Congruence of Fish Community Diversity and Composition Estimates Using Water and Sediment (Benthic Surface and Trapped Suspended Solids) Based Environmental DNA in a Recently Restored Creek 基于水和沉积物(底栖生物表面和捕获的悬浮物)的环境DNA对最近恢复的小溪中鱼类群落多样性和组成的一致性估计
IF 6.2 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.1002/edn3.70223
Kevin C. Morey, Erika Myler, Robert Hanner, Gerald R. Tetreault

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is increasingly paired with electrofishing efforts for aquatic biomonitoring and it has been shown that aquatic eDNA and electrofishing can be complementary when used together. Sedimentary eDNA is also used when monitoring rivers but is infrequently paired with electrofishing. Additionally, the utility of capturing eDNA from suspended solids as an alternative sampling medium in freshwater systems has not been explored. In this study, we used a common universal 12S metabarcoding assay for fishes on three different eDNA sampling media (water, benthic surface sediments, and trapped suspended solids) to determine which most similarly estimated fish community diversity with paired electrofishing efforts in a recently restored creek in Guelph, Ontario, Canada. A mock community comprised of DNA extracts from fish inhabiting the system was used as a positive control for species detection. Estimates of species richness were most comparable between electrofishing and trapped suspended solids though water samples estimated the greatest overall species richness. However, all three eDNA sampling media were found to generate estimates of community diversity that were more similar to each other than they were to estimates from electrofishing. Differences in community diversity were associated most strongly with collection method, weakly with sampling site, and were not associated with sampling period. Additionally, an indicator species analysis revealed that the taxa discriminating between the eDNA and electrofishing methods were all taxa that could not be amplified from the mock community. These findings suggest that the dissimilarity in diversity and indicator species observed between eDNA and electrofishing sampling methods is being primarily driven by methodological limitations relating to primer specificity and resolution.

环境DNA元条形码(Environmental DNA metbarcode, eDNA)越来越多地与电钓技术相结合,用于水生生物监测。沉积eDNA也用于监测河流,但很少与电捕鱼结合使用。此外,在淡水系统中,从悬浮固体中捕获eDNA作为替代取样介质的效用尚未得到探索。在这项研究中,我们对三种不同的eDNA采样介质(水、底栖表面沉积物和捕获的悬浮固体)上的鱼类使用了通用的12S元条形码分析,以确定在加拿大安大略省圭尔夫市最近恢复的一条小溪中,哪种鱼类群落多样性与配对电捕鱼最相似。模拟群落由居住在该系统中的鱼类的DNA提取物组成,作为物种检测的阳性对照。物种丰富度的估计值在电捕鱼和捕获的悬浮物之间最具可比性,尽管水样估计的总体物种丰富度最大。然而,发现所有三种eDNA取样介质产生的群落多样性估计值彼此之间比它们与电捕鱼估计值更相似。群落多样性差异与采集方式的相关性最强,与采样地点的相关性较弱,与采样周期的相关性不强。此外,指示种分析表明,eDNA和电钓方法之间的区分类群都是无法从模拟群落中扩增出来的类群。这些发现表明,eDNA和电钓取样方法在多样性和指示物种方面的差异主要是由引物特异性和分辨率方面的方法限制所驱动的。
{"title":"Congruence of Fish Community Diversity and Composition Estimates Using Water and Sediment (Benthic Surface and Trapped Suspended Solids) Based Environmental DNA in a Recently Restored Creek","authors":"Kevin C. Morey,&nbsp;Erika Myler,&nbsp;Robert Hanner,&nbsp;Gerald R. Tetreault","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70223","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70223","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is increasingly paired with electrofishing efforts for aquatic biomonitoring and it has been shown that aquatic eDNA and electrofishing can be complementary when used together. Sedimentary eDNA is also used when monitoring rivers but is infrequently paired with electrofishing. Additionally, the utility of capturing eDNA from suspended solids as an alternative sampling medium in freshwater systems has not been explored. In this study, we used a common universal 12S metabarcoding assay for fishes on three different eDNA sampling media (water, benthic surface sediments, and trapped suspended solids) to determine which most similarly estimated fish community diversity with paired electrofishing efforts in a recently restored creek in Guelph, Ontario, Canada. A mock community comprised of DNA extracts from fish inhabiting the system was used as a positive control for species detection. Estimates of species richness were most comparable between electrofishing and trapped suspended solids though water samples estimated the greatest overall species richness. However, all three eDNA sampling media were found to generate estimates of community diversity that were more similar to each other than they were to estimates from electrofishing. Differences in community diversity were associated most strongly with collection method, weakly with sampling site, and were not associated with sampling period. Additionally, an indicator species analysis revealed that the taxa discriminating between the eDNA and electrofishing methods were all taxa that could not be amplified from the mock community. These findings suggest that the dissimilarity in diversity and indicator species observed between eDNA and electrofishing sampling methods is being primarily driven by methodological limitations relating to primer specificity and resolution.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70223","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145626473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Molecular Surveillance of Honey Bee Hives Using eDNA Metabarcoding During Pollination Season 传粉季节蜂房eDNA元条形码的分子监测
IF 6.2 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2025-11-22 DOI: 10.1002/edn3.70220
Jessica Henneken, Francesco Martoni, Alexander Piper, Reannon Smith, Brendan Rodoni

Healthy honey bees are critical in safeguarding our food supply, but monitoring their health presents a significant challenge to apiarists, biosecurity agencies and animal health experts. Our objective was to investigate the feasibility of using environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding to characterize the arthropod, fungal and bacterial diversity of hives with a focus on taxa that contribute to hive health such as pests and pathogens, beneficials, and biocontrol agents. We collected hive debris from four hives approximately every 2 weeks during the pollination season, first at a research almond orchard and then at a small hobby farm. A single sample was also collected from a feral colony that was relocated to the hobby farm part way through the experiment. eDNA metabarcoding detected species from all the arthropod and microbial communities targeted in debris samples, including hive pests and pathogens as well as hive beneficials. Additionally, we detected DNA from other important agricultural pest and beneficial species not commonly associated with hives, as well as taxa that can impact human health. In total, 4480 unique amplicon sequence variants were recorded across the three taxonomic groups (arthropod, fungi and bacteria) considered in this study. Our results suggest that eDNA metabarcoding can be used to monitor different aspects of hive health, such as presence or absence of pests, pathogens, and beneficial organisms. Additionally, the whole community data collected could be used to detect and monitor agriculturally relevant species more broadly. Our findings contribute to a small but growing body of research laying the foundation for using hive diversity and indicator taxa as a measure of hive health.

健康的蜜蜂对保障我们的食物供应至关重要,但监测它们的健康对养蜂人、生物安全机构和动物健康专家来说是一个重大挑战。本研究的目的是探讨利用环境DNA (eDNA)元条形码表征蜂箱节肢动物、真菌和细菌多样性的可行性,重点关注对蜂箱健康有贡献的分类群,如害虫和病原体、有益生物和生物防治剂。在授粉季节,我们大约每两周从四个蜂箱中收集蜂箱碎片,首先在一个研究杏仁果园,然后在一个小型业余农场。在实验的过程中,我们还从一个被转移到业余农场的野生种群中收集了一个样本。eDNA元条形码检测到碎片样本中所有节肢动物和微生物群落的物种,包括蜂巢害虫和病原体以及蜂巢有益生物。此外,我们还检测了其他重要的农业害虫和有益物种的DNA,这些物种通常与荨麻疹无关,以及可能影响人类健康的分类群。在本研究考虑的三个分类类群(节肢动物、真菌和细菌)中,总共记录了4480个独特的扩增子序列变异。我们的研究结果表明,eDNA元条形码可以用于监测蜂箱健康的不同方面,例如害虫、病原体和有益生物的存在或缺失。此外,所收集的整个群落数据可用于更广泛地检测和监测农业相关物种。我们的发现为使用蜂巢多样性和指示分类群作为蜂巢健康的衡量标准奠定了基础。
{"title":"Molecular Surveillance of Honey Bee Hives Using eDNA Metabarcoding During Pollination Season","authors":"Jessica Henneken,&nbsp;Francesco Martoni,&nbsp;Alexander Piper,&nbsp;Reannon Smith,&nbsp;Brendan Rodoni","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70220","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70220","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Healthy honey bees are critical in safeguarding our food supply, but monitoring their health presents a significant challenge to apiarists, biosecurity agencies and animal health experts. Our objective was to investigate the feasibility of using environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding to characterize the arthropod, fungal and bacterial diversity of hives with a focus on taxa that contribute to hive health such as pests and pathogens, beneficials, and biocontrol agents. We collected hive debris from four hives approximately every 2 weeks during the pollination season, first at a research almond orchard and then at a small hobby farm. A single sample was also collected from a feral colony that was relocated to the hobby farm part way through the experiment. eDNA metabarcoding detected species from all the arthropod and microbial communities targeted in debris samples, including hive pests and pathogens as well as hive beneficials. Additionally, we detected DNA from other important agricultural pest and beneficial species not commonly associated with hives, as well as taxa that can impact human health. In total, 4480 unique amplicon sequence variants were recorded across the three taxonomic groups (arthropod, fungi and bacteria) considered in this study. Our results suggest that eDNA metabarcoding can be used to monitor different aspects of hive health, such as presence or absence of pests, pathogens, and beneficial organisms. Additionally, the whole community data collected could be used to detect and monitor agriculturally relevant species more broadly. Our findings contribute to a small but growing body of research laying the foundation for using hive diversity and indicator taxa as a measure of hive health.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70220","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145581374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of Short Generalist and Specific Markers to Assess the Diversity of Arthropods Using eDNA Metabarcoding 利用eDNA元条形码评估节肢动物多样性的短通用标记和特异标记的比较
IF 6.2 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.1002/edn3.70225
Gentile Francesco Ficetola, Alexis Carteron, Silvio Marta, Aurelie Bonin, Isabel Cantera, Pierre Taberlet, Alessia Guerrieri

A large number of marker typologies have been developed for the metabarcoding of environmental DNA (eDNA). Generalist markers have been advocated for their ability to amplify many taxa simultaneously and produce exhaustive biodiversity assessments, while more specific markers have been proposed for their higher ability to detect and discriminate taxa within a more restricted group. Quantitative comparisons between generalist and specific markers are needed to assess their relative efficiency depending on study targets. Here we compared the performance of one generalist (Euka02, amplifying all eukaryotic groups), one intermediate (Arth02, amplifying arthropods), and two specific markers (Coll01 and Inse01, amplifying springtails and insects, respectively) for the assessment of springtails and insects diversity using eDNA metabarcoding. The four markers were used to analyze eDNA extracted from > 1200 soil samples collected in recently deglaciated terrains. We then assessed whether the different markers were able to detect community responses to key environmental drivers (soil temperature, time since glacier retreat, plant productivity, and topographic wetness). The two specific markers detected more taxa of both springtails and insects than the generalist markers; still the taxonomic richness and community dissimilarity were well correlated between generalist and specific markers. There was good overlap between the taxa identified by the specific markers and those identified by the generalist ones, but the specific markers often detected the taxa identified by the generalist markers, plus several additional ones. Both generalist and specific markers detected the impact of key environmental drivers on arthropods; still the specific markers showed the strongest power to detect relationships, and the most generalist marker was unable to identify the weaker relationships. Generalist markers efficiently provide an overall view of soil biodiversity; nevertheless complementing them with specific markers allows more detailed biodiversity measures, and provides a clearer picture of its response to environmental stressors.

环境DNA (eDNA)元条形码的标记类型已经发展出了大量的标记类型。通才型标记因其能够同时扩增许多分类群并产生详尽的生物多样性评估而被推崇,而更具体的标记则因其在更有限的类群中具有更高的检测和区分分类群的能力而被提出。需要对通才标记和特异标记进行定量比较,以评估它们在不同研究目标下的相对效率。本研究比较了利用eDNA元条形码评价弹尾和昆虫多样性的一个通才(Euka02,扩增所有真核生物群体)、一个中间体(Arth02,扩增节肢动物)和两个特异标记(Coll01和Inse01,分别扩增弹尾和昆虫)的性能。这四种标记被用于分析从最近冰川消退的地区收集的1200个土壤样本中提取的eDNA。然后,我们评估了不同的标记是否能够检测群落对关键环境驱动因素(土壤温度、冰川退缩时间、植物生产力和地形湿度)的响应。这两种特异标记比通用标记检测到更多的跳尾和昆虫类群;分类丰富度和群落差异度在通才标记和特异标记之间具有良好的相关性。特异标记所鉴定的类群与通才标记所鉴定的类群有很好的重叠,但特异标记往往能检测到通才标记所鉴定的类群,而且还能检测到若干附加标记。通用性标记和特异性标记都检测了关键环境驱动因素对节肢动物的影响;尽管如此,特定的标记仍然显示出最强的能力来检测关系,而最通才的标记无法识别较弱的关系。通才标记有效地提供了土壤生物多样性的整体视图;然而,用特定的标记来补充它们,可以更详细地测量生物多样性,并更清楚地了解其对环境压力的反应。
{"title":"Comparison of Short Generalist and Specific Markers to Assess the Diversity of Arthropods Using eDNA Metabarcoding","authors":"Gentile Francesco Ficetola,&nbsp;Alexis Carteron,&nbsp;Silvio Marta,&nbsp;Aurelie Bonin,&nbsp;Isabel Cantera,&nbsp;Pierre Taberlet,&nbsp;Alessia Guerrieri","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70225","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70225","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A large number of marker typologies have been developed for the metabarcoding of environmental DNA (eDNA). Generalist markers have been advocated for their ability to amplify many taxa simultaneously and produce exhaustive biodiversity assessments, while more specific markers have been proposed for their higher ability to detect and discriminate taxa within a more restricted group. Quantitative comparisons between generalist and specific markers are needed to assess their relative efficiency depending on study targets. Here we compared the performance of one generalist (Euka02, amplifying all eukaryotic groups), one intermediate (Arth02, amplifying arthropods), and two specific markers (Coll01 and Inse01, amplifying springtails and insects, respectively) for the assessment of springtails and insects diversity using eDNA metabarcoding. The four markers were used to analyze eDNA extracted from &gt; 1200 soil samples collected in recently deglaciated terrains. We then assessed whether the different markers were able to detect community responses to key environmental drivers (soil temperature, time since glacier retreat, plant productivity, and topographic wetness). The two specific markers detected more taxa of both springtails and insects than the generalist markers; still the taxonomic richness and community dissimilarity were well correlated between generalist and specific markers. There was good overlap between the taxa identified by the specific markers and those identified by the generalist ones, but the specific markers often detected the taxa identified by the generalist markers, plus several additional ones. Both generalist and specific markers detected the impact of key environmental drivers on arthropods; still the specific markers showed the strongest power to detect relationships, and the most generalist marker was unable to identify the weaker relationships. Generalist markers efficiently provide an overall view of soil biodiversity; nevertheless complementing them with specific markers allows more detailed biodiversity measures, and provides a clearer picture of its response to environmental stressors.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70225","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145581109","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Filtering Microbial Diversity: Evaluation of Different Pore Sizes for eDNA Community Profiling 过滤微生物多样性:不同孔径对eDNA群落分析的评价
IF 6.2 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2025-11-18 DOI: 10.1002/edn3.70221
Irene Gregori, Francesco Martino, Lorenzo Zane, Alberto Pallavicini, Alessandro Vezzi

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is widely used in biodiversity monitoring, and its popularity is also growing because of its potential to simultaneously detect multiple taxonomic groups, allowing holistic community assessments. When working with water samples, the choice of the filter type is one of the key methodological factors influencing community characterization, with 0.22 μm pore size filters typically used for microbial communities and larger filters for eDNA of larger organisms. However, as holistic community assessments are increasingly adopted, the use of a single filter pore size would help to optimize sampling and experimental efforts. Yet, it remains unclear whether filters with large pore sizes can effectively capture both microbial and macro-organism eDNA. This study evaluates the use of 0.45 μm filters, commonly used for metazoan eDNA metabarcoding, in assessing microbial diversity across different coastal environments. Replicates of water samples from the Venice Lagoon and nearby waters were filtered independently using both 0.45 μm and the standard 0.22 μm pore size filters and analyzed through 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding. Both filters capture a shared core microbial community, but they also retain distinct taxa. Alpha diversity was significantly higher in samples collected with the 0.45 μm filters, which also showed a more effective recovery of particle-associated microbes. Our work contributes to optimizing eDNA-based methodologies for large-scale multi-taxa biodiversity monitoring, demonstrating that 0.45 μm filters can effectively capture microbial diversity and supporting their use in holistic studies in aquatic environments.

环境DNA元条形码(Environmental DNA metabarcoding, eDNA)在生物多样性监测中得到了广泛的应用,并且由于其同时检测多个分类类群的潜力,使得整体的群落评估成为可能,其应用也越来越广泛。当处理水样时,过滤器类型的选择是影响群落表征的关键方法学因素之一,孔径0.22 μm的过滤器通常用于微生物群落,较大的过滤器用于较大生物的eDNA。然而,随着整体群落评估越来越多地被采用,使用单一过滤器孔径将有助于优化采样和实验工作。然而,大孔径过滤器是否能有效捕获微生物和大型生物的eDNA仍不清楚。本研究评估了0.45 μm过滤器(通常用于后生动物eDNA元条形码)在评估不同沿海环境微生物多样性中的应用。采用0.45 μm和标准0.22 μm孔径过滤器分别对威尼斯潟湖及附近水域的水样进行重复过滤,并通过16S rRNA基因元条形码进行分析。这两个过滤器捕获了一个共享的核心微生物群落,但它们也保留了不同的分类群。0.45 μm滤芯样品的α多样性显著提高,对颗粒相关微生物的回收率也更高。我们的工作有助于优化基于edna的大规模多类群生物多样性监测方法,表明0.45 μm过滤器可以有效捕获微生物多样性,并支持其在水生环境整体研究中的应用。
{"title":"Filtering Microbial Diversity: Evaluation of Different Pore Sizes for eDNA Community Profiling","authors":"Irene Gregori,&nbsp;Francesco Martino,&nbsp;Lorenzo Zane,&nbsp;Alberto Pallavicini,&nbsp;Alessandro Vezzi","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70221","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70221","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is widely used in biodiversity monitoring, and its popularity is also growing because of its potential to simultaneously detect multiple taxonomic groups, allowing holistic community assessments. When working with water samples, the choice of the filter type is one of the key methodological factors influencing community characterization, with 0.22 μm pore size filters typically used for microbial communities and larger filters for eDNA of larger organisms. However, as holistic community assessments are increasingly adopted, the use of a single filter pore size would help to optimize sampling and experimental efforts. Yet, it remains unclear whether filters with large pore sizes can effectively capture both microbial and macro-organism eDNA. This study evaluates the use of 0.45 μm filters, commonly used for metazoan eDNA metabarcoding, in assessing microbial diversity across different coastal environments. Replicates of water samples from the Venice Lagoon and nearby waters were filtered independently using both 0.45 μm and the standard 0.22 μm pore size filters and analyzed through 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding. Both filters capture a shared core microbial community, but they also retain distinct taxa. Alpha diversity was significantly higher in samples collected with the 0.45 μm filters, which also showed a more effective recovery of particle-associated microbes. Our work contributes to optimizing eDNA-based methodologies for large-scale multi-taxa biodiversity monitoring, demonstrating that 0.45 μm filters can effectively capture microbial diversity and supporting their use in holistic studies in aquatic environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70221","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145581080","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fake Webs, Real Results: Artificial Spiderwebs for eDNA Collection 假网,真实的结果:人造蜘蛛网为eDNA收集
IF 6.2 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2025-11-14 DOI: 10.1002/edn3.70194
Angela McGaughran, Starsha Bird, Manpreet K. Dhami

Environmental DNA (eDNA)-based detection is a valuable biomonitoring tool that is well-developed for water, soil, and scat substrates. Emergent research is focusing on air as a new substrate, including opportunistically collected natural spiderwebs which may have negative impacts on local spider diversity. Here, we design novel artificial spiderwebs and compare their effectiveness with natural spiderwebs and aquatic eDNA approaches for biomonitoring of terrestrial taxa. A total of 33 eDNA samples (18 water, 6 natural spiderwebs, 9 artificial spiderwebs) were collected from a rural property in Palmerston North (Aotearoa New Zealand). Three amplicons (COI, 16S, and ITS) were sequenced for each sample to evaluate the performance of each collection method for detecting invertebrates, vertebrates, and plant/algal taxa. The 16S amplicon performed best in terms of sequencing output and consistency, as well as species accumulation curves, with the COI dataset performing worst for all eDNA collection methods. Alpha diversity varied by amplicon and collection method in both value and consistency among samples, with 16S and ITS retrieving higher diversity for water samples and both artificial and natural webs outperforming water in fungal COI diversity recovery. Ordination plots showed clear differences in sample similarity across biomes, with all three amplicons showing differentiation between water and either web type. However, specialist species were recovered by each of the two web types, with artificial webs consistently recovering more unique diversity than natural webs. Our results suggest that artificial spiderwebs could be a promising new method in the eDNA biomonitoring toolbox, providing biodiversity data that complements water-based collections and, depending on the research question, may serve as a sufficient proxy for natural spiderweb studies.

基于环境DNA (eDNA)的检测是一种有价值的生物监测工具,在水、土壤和粪便基质中得到了很好的发展。新兴研究的重点是空气作为一种新的基质,包括机会性地收集可能对当地蜘蛛多样性产生负面影响的天然蜘蛛网。在此,我们设计了一种新型的人工蜘蛛网,并将其与天然蜘蛛网和水生eDNA方法在陆地分类群生物监测中的效果进行了比较。在新西兰北部帕默斯顿(Palmerston North, Aotearoa)的一处农村地区共采集了33份eDNA样本(18份水,6份天然蜘蛛网,9份人工蜘蛛网)。对每个样品的三个扩增子(COI, 16S和ITS)进行测序,以评估每种收集方法检测无脊椎动物,脊椎动物和植物/藻类分类群的性能。16S扩增子在测序输出和一致性以及物种积累曲线方面表现最好,而COI数据集在所有eDNA收集方法中表现最差。α多样性随扩增子和采集方法的不同而不同,样品之间的α多样性值和一致性也不同,16S和ITS在水样中检索到更高的多样性,人工和自然网在真菌COI多样性恢复方面都优于水。排序图显示了不同生物群系样本相似性的明显差异,所有三个扩增子都显示了水网和任一网类型之间的差异。然而,两种网都恢复了特殊物种,人工网始终比自然网恢复更多独特的多样性。我们的研究结果表明,人工蜘蛛网可能是eDNA生物监测工具箱中一个有前途的新方法,提供生物多样性数据,补充水基收集,并且根据研究问题,可以作为天然蜘蛛网研究的充分代理。
{"title":"Fake Webs, Real Results: Artificial Spiderwebs for eDNA Collection","authors":"Angela McGaughran,&nbsp;Starsha Bird,&nbsp;Manpreet K. Dhami","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70194","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70194","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental DNA (eDNA)-based detection is a valuable biomonitoring tool that is well-developed for water, soil, and scat substrates. Emergent research is focusing on air as a new substrate, including opportunistically collected natural spiderwebs which may have negative impacts on local spider diversity. Here, we design novel artificial spiderwebs and compare their effectiveness with natural spiderwebs and aquatic eDNA approaches for biomonitoring of terrestrial taxa. A total of 33 eDNA samples (18 water, 6 natural spiderwebs, 9 artificial spiderwebs) were collected from a rural property in Palmerston North (Aotearoa New Zealand). Three amplicons (COI, 16S, and ITS) were sequenced for each sample to evaluate the performance of each collection method for detecting invertebrates, vertebrates, and plant/algal taxa. The 16S amplicon performed best in terms of sequencing output and consistency, as well as species accumulation curves, with the COI dataset performing worst for all eDNA collection methods. Alpha diversity varied by amplicon and collection method in both value and consistency among samples, with 16S and ITS retrieving higher diversity for water samples and both artificial and natural webs outperforming water in fungal COI diversity recovery. Ordination plots showed clear differences in sample similarity across biomes, with all three amplicons showing differentiation between water and either web type. However, specialist species were recovered by each of the two web types, with artificial webs consistently recovering more unique diversity than natural webs. Our results suggest that artificial spiderwebs could be a promising new method in the eDNA biomonitoring toolbox, providing biodiversity data that complements water-based collections and, depending on the research question, may serve as a sufficient proxy for natural spiderweb studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70194","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145522025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Environmental DNA
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1