The effect of irradiance versus light dose on the antioxidant activity of two strains of Ulva lacinulata

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-03-11 DOI:10.1515/bot-2023-0064
Isabel Cardoso, Anneke Meiβner, Laurie C. Hofmann
{"title":"The effect of irradiance versus light dose on the antioxidant activity of two strains of Ulva lacinulata","authors":"Isabel Cardoso, Anneke Meiβner, Laurie C. Hofmann","doi":"10.1515/bot-2023-0064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The genus <jats:italic>Ulva</jats:italic>, described as a good source of antioxidants known for its antibacterial properties and associated with the capacity to adapt to different environments and high growth rates, has justified the increasing interest in its large-scale production. While extensive research has been done on optimizing the extraction of <jats:italic>Ulv</jats:italic>a’s bioactive compounds, few studies were conducted on increasing or optimizing antioxidant activity (AA) of <jats:italic>Ulva</jats:italic> spp. during cultivation. Our study aimed to investigate an optimization method of <jats:italic>Ulva lacinulata</jats:italic> by testing the impact of light dose and irradiance on its AA. Two geographically different strains (NE-Atlantic and Mediterranean) were observed for 5 days under two irradiances (70 or 185 µmol photons m<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup> s<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) with the same light dose (4 mol photons m<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup> d<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>). Samples were collected at different times (0, 3, 24, 48 and 120 h) to evaluate their antioxidant activity (with 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) radical decolorization assay) and photosynthetic performance (with Pulse Amplitude Modulated fluorometer). A strain-dependent response was observed in the NE-Atlantic strain which had significantly higher AA after 5 days (89 %) under the photosynthetic saturating irradiance, while the Mediterranean strain was not impacted, suggesting that light dose may significantly affect AA in certain <jats:italic>Ulva</jats:italic> spp.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/bot-2023-0064","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The genus Ulva, described as a good source of antioxidants known for its antibacterial properties and associated with the capacity to adapt to different environments and high growth rates, has justified the increasing interest in its large-scale production. While extensive research has been done on optimizing the extraction of Ulva’s bioactive compounds, few studies were conducted on increasing or optimizing antioxidant activity (AA) of Ulva spp. during cultivation. Our study aimed to investigate an optimization method of Ulva lacinulata by testing the impact of light dose and irradiance on its AA. Two geographically different strains (NE-Atlantic and Mediterranean) were observed for 5 days under two irradiances (70 or 185 µmol photons m−2 s−1) with the same light dose (4 mol photons m−2 d−1). Samples were collected at different times (0, 3, 24, 48 and 120 h) to evaluate their antioxidant activity (with 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) radical decolorization assay) and photosynthetic performance (with Pulse Amplitude Modulated fluorometer). A strain-dependent response was observed in the NE-Atlantic strain which had significantly higher AA after 5 days (89 %) under the photosynthetic saturating irradiance, while the Mediterranean strain was not impacted, suggesting that light dose may significantly affect AA in certain Ulva spp.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
辐照度与光剂量对两种莼菜抗氧化活性的影响
莼菜属植物是抗氧化剂的良好来源,具有抗菌特性,能适应不同环境,生长速度快,因此人们对其大规模生产的兴趣与日俱增。虽然人们对优化莼菜生物活性化合物的提取进行了大量研究,但很少有人研究如何在莼菜栽培过程中提高或优化莼菜的抗氧化活性(AA)。我们的研究旨在通过测试光剂量和辐照度对莼菜抗氧化活性的影响,研究一种优化莼菜抗氧化活性的方法。在两种辐照度(70 或 185 µmol photons m-2 s-1)和相同光照剂量(4 mol photons m-2 d-1)下,对两个地理位置不同的菌株(东北大西洋和地中海)进行了为期 5 天的观察。在不同时间(0、3、24、48 和 120 小时)采集样品,以评估其抗氧化活性(2,2′-氮基-双(3-乙基苯并噻唑啉-6-磺酸)自由基脱色试验)和光合作用性能(脉冲调幅荧光计)。在光合作用饱和辐照度下,东北大西洋品系 5 天后的 AA 明显更高(89%),而地中海品系则不受影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1