A hybrid model-data method for seismic response reconstruction of instrumented buildings

IF 3.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Earthquake Spectra Pub Date : 2024-03-11 DOI:10.1177/87552930241231686
Farid Ghahari, Daniel Swensen, Hamid Haddadi, Ertugrul Taciroglu
{"title":"A hybrid model-data method for seismic response reconstruction of instrumented buildings","authors":"Farid Ghahari, Daniel Swensen, Hamid Haddadi, Ertugrul Taciroglu","doi":"10.1177/87552930241231686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study presents a two-step hybrid (model-data fusion) method for reconstructing the seismic response of instrumented buildings at their non-instrumented floors. Over the past couple of decades, seismic data recorded within instrumented buildings have yielded invaluable insights into the behavior of civil structures, which were arguably impossible to obtain through numerical simulations, laboratory-scale experiments, or even in-situ testing. Recently, advances in sensing technology have opened new pathways for structural health monitoring (SHM) and rapid post-earthquake assessment. However, data-driven techniques tend to lack accuracy when structures have sparse instrumentation. In addition, creating detailed numerical models for the monitored structures is labor-intensive and time-consuming, often unsuitable for rapid post-event assessments. The common approach to address these challenges has been to use simple interpolation techniques over the sparse measurements. However, uncertainties associated with such estimates are usually overlooked, and these methods have certain physical limitations. In this study, we propose a two-step approach for reconstructing seismic responses. In the initial step, a coupled shear–flexural beam model is calibrated using data collected from instrumented floors. Next, the residual, representing the difference between measurements and the beam model’s predictions, is used to train a Gaussian process regression model. The combination of these two models provides both the mean and variance of the response at the non-instrumented floors. This new approach is verified by using simulated acceleration responses of a tall building. Validation is attained by using real seismic data recorded in two tall buildings and comparing the method’s predictions with actual measurements on floors not used for training. Finally, data recorded in a 52-story building during multiple earthquakes are used for demonstrating the practical application of the proposed approach in real-world scenarios.","PeriodicalId":11392,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Spectra","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Spectra","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930241231686","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a two-step hybrid (model-data fusion) method for reconstructing the seismic response of instrumented buildings at their non-instrumented floors. Over the past couple of decades, seismic data recorded within instrumented buildings have yielded invaluable insights into the behavior of civil structures, which were arguably impossible to obtain through numerical simulations, laboratory-scale experiments, or even in-situ testing. Recently, advances in sensing technology have opened new pathways for structural health monitoring (SHM) and rapid post-earthquake assessment. However, data-driven techniques tend to lack accuracy when structures have sparse instrumentation. In addition, creating detailed numerical models for the monitored structures is labor-intensive and time-consuming, often unsuitable for rapid post-event assessments. The common approach to address these challenges has been to use simple interpolation techniques over the sparse measurements. However, uncertainties associated with such estimates are usually overlooked, and these methods have certain physical limitations. In this study, we propose a two-step approach for reconstructing seismic responses. In the initial step, a coupled shear–flexural beam model is calibrated using data collected from instrumented floors. Next, the residual, representing the difference between measurements and the beam model’s predictions, is used to train a Gaussian process regression model. The combination of these two models provides both the mean and variance of the response at the non-instrumented floors. This new approach is verified by using simulated acceleration responses of a tall building. Validation is attained by using real seismic data recorded in two tall buildings and comparing the method’s predictions with actual measurements on floors not used for training. Finally, data recorded in a 52-story building during multiple earthquakes are used for demonstrating the practical application of the proposed approach in real-world scenarios.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于重建带仪器建筑物地震响应的模型-数据混合法
本研究提出了一种两步混合(模型-数据融合)方法,用于重建仪器建筑物非仪器楼层的地震响应。在过去的几十年中,仪器建筑物内记录的地震数据为了解民用建筑的行为提供了宝贵的资料,而这些资料是无法通过数值模拟、实验室规模的实验甚至现场测试获得的。最近,传感技术的进步为结构健康监测(SHM)和震后快速评估开辟了新的途径。然而,当结构的仪器设备稀少时,数据驱动技术往往缺乏准确性。此外,为受监测的结构创建详细的数值模型耗费大量人力和时间,通常不适合进行快速的震后评估。应对这些挑战的常用方法是对稀疏的测量结果使用简单的插值技术。然而,与此类估计相关的不确定性通常会被忽视,而且这些方法有一定的物理局限性。在本研究中,我们提出了一种分两步重建地震响应的方法。在第一步中,使用从仪器楼层收集的数据对剪力-柔性梁耦合模型进行校准。接下来,代表测量值与梁模型预测值之间差异的残差被用来训练高斯过程回归模型。这两个模型的组合可提供无仪器楼层响应的平均值和方差。这种新方法通过模拟高层建筑的加速度响应进行验证。通过使用两座高层建筑中记录的真实地震数据,并将该方法的预测结果与未用于训练的楼层的实际测量结果进行比较,对该方法进行了验证。最后,还使用了一栋 52 层楼高的建筑在多次地震中记录的数据,以展示所提方法在现实世界场景中的实际应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Earthquake Spectra
Earthquake Spectra 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Earthquake Spectra, the professional peer-reviewed journal of the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), serves as the publication of record for the development of earthquake engineering practice, earthquake codes and regulations, earthquake public policy, and earthquake investigation reports. The journal is published quarterly in both printed and online editions in February, May, August, and November, with additional special edition issues. EERI established Earthquake Spectra with the purpose of improving the practice of earthquake hazards mitigation, preparedness, and recovery — serving the informational needs of the diverse professionals engaged in earthquake risk reduction: civil, geotechnical, mechanical, and structural engineers; geologists, seismologists, and other earth scientists; architects and city planners; public officials; social scientists; and researchers.
期刊最新文献
Deep-neural-network model for predicting ground motion parameters using earthquake horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios Ground-motions site and event specificity: Insights from assessing a suite of simulated ground motions in the San Francisco Bay Area Analysis of site-response residuals from empirical ground-motion models to account for observed sedimentary basin effects in Wellington, New Zealand Modeling hospital resources based on global epidemiology after earthquake-related disasters Front Matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1