Efficiency of mixed and rigid occlusal stabilization splints: Randomized clinical trial.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Brazilian oral research Pub Date : 2024-03-11 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0017
Layza Rossatto Oppitz, Ana Carolina Mastriani Arantes, Roberto Ramos Garanhani, Carlos Alberto Costa, Cristiano Miranda de Araujo, Orlando Motohiro Tanaka, Patricia Kern di Scala Andreis, Claudia Schappo, Sérgio Aparecido Ignácio, Aline Cristina Batista Rodrigues Johann, Rodrigo Nunes Rached, Elisa Souza Camargo
{"title":"Efficiency of mixed and rigid occlusal stabilization splints: Randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Layza Rossatto Oppitz, Ana Carolina Mastriani Arantes, Roberto Ramos Garanhani, Carlos Alberto Costa, Cristiano Miranda de Araujo, Orlando Motohiro Tanaka, Patricia Kern di Scala Andreis, Claudia Schappo, Sérgio Aparecido Ignácio, Aline Cristina Batista Rodrigues Johann, Rodrigo Nunes Rached, Elisa Souza Camargo","doi":"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Occlusal stabilization splints are the most common treatment for controlling the deleterious effects of sleep bruxism. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a low-cost, mixed occlusal splint (MOS) compared to that of a rigid splint. A randomized clinical trial was performed on 43 adults of both sexes with possible sleep bruxism and satisfactory dental conditions. They were divided into rigid occlusal splint (ROS) (n = 23) and MOS (n = 20) groups. Masticatory muscle and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain intensity (visual analog scale), quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF), indentations in the oral mucosa, anxiety, and depression (HADS), number of days of splint use, and splint wear were evaluated. All variables were evaluated at baseline (T0), 6 months (T6), and 12 months (T12) after splint installation (T0), and splint wear was evaluated at T6 and T12. Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, non-parametric Friedman's analysis of variance for paired samples and pairwise multiple comparisons, Pearson's chi-square test, two-proportion z-test, non-parametric McNemar's and Cochran's Q, and Wilcoxon tests were used (p < 0.05). In both groups, there was a decrease in TMJ pain and pain intensity over time and improvements in the quality of life scores. At T6, there was a higher rate of splint wear in the MOS group than in the ROS group (p = 0.023). The MOS showed a higher rate of wear than the rigid splint but had similar results for the other variables. Therefore, the use of a mixed splint appears to be effective in controlling the signs and symptoms of sleep bruxism.</p>","PeriodicalId":9240,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian oral research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian oral research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Occlusal stabilization splints are the most common treatment for controlling the deleterious effects of sleep bruxism. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a low-cost, mixed occlusal splint (MOS) compared to that of a rigid splint. A randomized clinical trial was performed on 43 adults of both sexes with possible sleep bruxism and satisfactory dental conditions. They were divided into rigid occlusal splint (ROS) (n = 23) and MOS (n = 20) groups. Masticatory muscle and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain intensity (visual analog scale), quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF), indentations in the oral mucosa, anxiety, and depression (HADS), number of days of splint use, and splint wear were evaluated. All variables were evaluated at baseline (T0), 6 months (T6), and 12 months (T12) after splint installation (T0), and splint wear was evaluated at T6 and T12. Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, non-parametric Friedman's analysis of variance for paired samples and pairwise multiple comparisons, Pearson's chi-square test, two-proportion z-test, non-parametric McNemar's and Cochran's Q, and Wilcoxon tests were used (p < 0.05). In both groups, there was a decrease in TMJ pain and pain intensity over time and improvements in the quality of life scores. At T6, there was a higher rate of splint wear in the MOS group than in the ROS group (p = 0.023). The MOS showed a higher rate of wear than the rigid splint but had similar results for the other variables. Therefore, the use of a mixed splint appears to be effective in controlling the signs and symptoms of sleep bruxism.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合型和刚性咬合稳定夹板的效率:随机临床试验。
咬合稳定夹板是控制睡眠磨牙症有害影响的最常见治疗方法。本研究旨在评估一种低成本的混合咬合夹板(MOS)与硬质夹板相比的效果。研究人员对 43 名可能患有睡眠磨牙症且牙齿状况良好的成年男女进行了随机临床试验。他们被分为刚性咬合夹板(ROS)组(23 人)和 MOS 组(20 人)。对咀嚼肌和颞下颌关节(TMJ)疼痛强度(视觉模拟量表)、生活质量(WHOQOL-BREF)、口腔粘膜压痕、焦虑和抑郁(HADS)、夹板使用天数以及夹板磨损情况进行了评估。所有变量均在夹板安装(T0)后的基线(T0)、6 个月(T6)和 12 个月(T12)时进行评估,夹板磨损情况在 T6 和 T12 时进行评估。采用了学生 t 检验、曼-惠特尼 U 检验、非参数弗里德曼配对样本方差分析和配对多重比较、皮尔逊卡方检验、两比例 z 检验、非参数麦克尼玛 Q 检验和科克兰 Q 检验以及 Wilcoxon 检验(P < 0.05)。随着时间的推移,两组患者的颞下颌关节疼痛和疼痛强度都有所减轻,生活质量评分也有所提高。在 T6 期,MOS 组的夹板磨损率高于 ROS 组(p = 0.023)。MOS夹板的磨损率高于硬夹板,但其他变量的结果相似。因此,使用混合夹板似乎可以有效控制睡眠磨牙症的症状和体征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Do SOD2 and SOD3 gene polymorphisms impact the oral health-related quality of life in Para athletes? Evaluation of polymerization shrinkage stress and cuspal strain in natural and typodont teeth. Exploring the factors driving higher interactions in false amber necklace posts on Facebook. Impact of COVID-19 on pediatric dental care in two epicenters: Italy and Brazil. Impact of streptozotocin-induced diabetes on experimental masseter pain in rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1