Nanotopography and oral bacterial adhesion on titanium surfaces: in vitro and in vivo studies.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Brazilian oral research Pub Date : 2024-03-11 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0021
Humberto Osvaldo Schwartz-Filho, Tauane Ramaldes Martins, Paulo Roberto Sano, Marcela Takemoto Araújo, Daniel Cheuk Hong Chan, Nathália Ramaldes Saldanha, Kátia de Pádua Silva, Talita Signoreti Graziano, William Cunha Brandt, Caio Vinícius Roman Torres, Karina Cogo-Müller
{"title":"Nanotopography and oral bacterial adhesion on titanium surfaces: in vitro and in vivo studies.","authors":"Humberto Osvaldo Schwartz-Filho, Tauane Ramaldes Martins, Paulo Roberto Sano, Marcela Takemoto Araújo, Daniel Cheuk Hong Chan, Nathália Ramaldes Saldanha, Kátia de Pádua Silva, Talita Signoreti Graziano, William Cunha Brandt, Caio Vinícius Roman Torres, Karina Cogo-Müller","doi":"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study aimed to evaluate the influence of titanium surface nanotopography on the initial bacterial adhesion process by in vivo and in vitro study models. Titanium disks were produced and characterized according to their surface topography: machined (Ti-M), microtopography (Ti-Micro), and nanotopography (Ti-Nano). For the in vivo study, 18 subjects wore oral acrylic splints containing 2 disks from each group for 24 h (n = 36). After this period, the disks were removed from the splints and evaluated by microbial culture method, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and qPCR for quantification of Streptococcus oralis, Actinomyces naeslundii, Fusobacterium nucleatum, as well as total bacteria. For the in vitro study, adhesion tests were performed with the species S. oralis and A. naeslundii for 24 h. Data were compared by ANOVA, with Tukey's post-test. Regarding the in vivo study, both the total aerobic and total anaerobic bacteria counts were similar among groups (p > 0.05). In qPCR, there was no difference among groups of bacteria adhered to the disks (p > 0.05), except for A. naeslundii, which was found in lower proportions in the Ti-Nano group (p < 0.05). In the SEM analysis, the groups had a similar bacterial distribution, with a predominance of cocci and few bacilli. In the in vitro study, there was no difference in the adhesion profile for S. oralis and A. naeslundii after 24 h of biofilm formation (p > 0.05). Thus, we conclude that micro- and nanotopography do not affect bacterial adhesion, considering an initial period of biofilm formation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9240,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian oral research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376621/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian oral research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate the influence of titanium surface nanotopography on the initial bacterial adhesion process by in vivo and in vitro study models. Titanium disks were produced and characterized according to their surface topography: machined (Ti-M), microtopography (Ti-Micro), and nanotopography (Ti-Nano). For the in vivo study, 18 subjects wore oral acrylic splints containing 2 disks from each group for 24 h (n = 36). After this period, the disks were removed from the splints and evaluated by microbial culture method, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and qPCR for quantification of Streptococcus oralis, Actinomyces naeslundii, Fusobacterium nucleatum, as well as total bacteria. For the in vitro study, adhesion tests were performed with the species S. oralis and A. naeslundii for 24 h. Data were compared by ANOVA, with Tukey's post-test. Regarding the in vivo study, both the total aerobic and total anaerobic bacteria counts were similar among groups (p > 0.05). In qPCR, there was no difference among groups of bacteria adhered to the disks (p > 0.05), except for A. naeslundii, which was found in lower proportions in the Ti-Nano group (p < 0.05). In the SEM analysis, the groups had a similar bacterial distribution, with a predominance of cocci and few bacilli. In the in vitro study, there was no difference in the adhesion profile for S. oralis and A. naeslundii after 24 h of biofilm formation (p > 0.05). Thus, we conclude that micro- and nanotopography do not affect bacterial adhesion, considering an initial period of biofilm formation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
钛表面的纳米形貌和口腔细菌粘附:体外和体内研究。
本研究旨在通过体内和体外研究模型评估钛表面纳米形貌对细菌初始粘附过程的影响。钛盘是根据其表面形貌(机加工钛盘(Ti-M)、微形貌钛盘(Ti-Micro)和纳米形貌钛盘(Ti-Nano))制作和表征的。在活体研究中,18 名受试者佩戴了口腔丙烯酸夹板,每组包含 2 块钛盘,持续 24 小时(n = 36)。之后,从夹板上取下夹板,并通过微生物培养法、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和 qPCR 对口腔链球菌、奈氏放线菌、核酸镰刀菌以及细菌总数进行定量评估。在体外研究中,对口腔链球菌和纳氏放线菌进行了 24 小时的粘附试验。在体内研究方面,各组的需氧菌总数和厌氧菌总数相似(p > 0.05)。在 qPCR 分析中,各组间盘片上附着的细菌数量没有差异(p > 0.05),只有 A. naeslundii 在 Ti-Nano 组中的比例较低(p < 0.05)。在扫描电镜分析中,各组的细菌分布相似,都以球菌为主,杆菌很少。在体外研究中,经过 24 小时的生物膜形成后,口腔脓疱疮杆菌和纳氏脓疱疮杆菌的粘附情况没有差异(p > 0.05)。因此,我们得出结论:考虑到生物膜形成的初始阶段,微表面和纳米表面并不会影响细菌的粘附性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Brazilian Oral Pathology and Oral Medicine: current state of the study of rare diseases. A novel low shrinkage dimethacrylate monomer as an alternative to BisGMA for adhesive and resin-based composite applications. A YOLO-V5 approach for the evaluation of normal fillings and overhanging fillings: an artificial intelligence study. Cross-cultural adaptation of the eHealth Literacy Scale for Brazilian adolescents. Influence of the digital file format on radiographic diagnostic in dentistry: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1