Association between protocol change to a higher-protein formula with lower energy targets and nutrient delivery in critically ill patients with COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI:10.1002/jpen.2620
Kym Wittholz MDietS, Chloe Hinckfus BSc (Hons), Amalia Karahalios PhD, Haustine Panganiban BNS, Nadine Phillips MBiostat, Hannah Rotherham MBBS, Thomas Rechnitzer MBBS, Yasmine Ali Abdelhamid PhD, Adam M. Deane PhD, Kate Fetterplace PhD
{"title":"Association between protocol change to a higher-protein formula with lower energy targets and nutrient delivery in critically ill patients with COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Kym Wittholz MDietS,&nbsp;Chloe Hinckfus BSc (Hons),&nbsp;Amalia Karahalios PhD,&nbsp;Haustine Panganiban BNS,&nbsp;Nadine Phillips MBiostat,&nbsp;Hannah Rotherham MBBS,&nbsp;Thomas Rechnitzer MBBS,&nbsp;Yasmine Ali Abdelhamid PhD,&nbsp;Adam M. Deane PhD,&nbsp;Kate Fetterplace PhD","doi":"10.1002/jpen.2620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Guidelines recommend prioritizing protein provision while avoiding excessive energy delivery to critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but there are no prospective studies evaluating such a targeted approach in this group. We aimed to evaluate the effect of a “higher-protein formula protocol” on protein, energy, and volume delivery when compared with standard nutrition protocol.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with COVID-19 who received mechanical ventilation for &gt;72 h and enteral nutrition. Before October 2021, the standard nutrition protocol for patients was 0.7 ml/kg/h ideal body weight (IBW) of a 63 g/L protein and 1250 kcal/L formula. From October 2021, we implemented a higher-protein formula protocol for patients with COVID-19. The initial prescription was 0.5 ml/kg/h IBW of a 100 g/L protein and 1260 kcal/L formula with greater emphasis on energy targets being directed by indirect calorimetry when possible. Measured outcomes included protein, energy, and volume delivered.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were 114 participants (standard protocol, 48; higher-protein protocol, 66) with 1324 days of nutrition support. The median (95% CI) differences in protein, energy, and volume delivery between targeted and standard protocol periods were 0.08 g/kg/day (−0.02 to 0.18 g/kg/day), −1.71 kcal/kg/day (−3.64 to 0.21 kcal/kg/day) and −1.5 ml/kg/day (−2.9 to −0.1 ml/kg/day). Thirty-three patients (standard protocol, 7; higher-protein protocol, 26) had 44 indirect calorimetry assessments. There was no difference in measured energy expenditure over time (increased by 0.49 kcal/kg/day [−0.89 to 1.88 kcal/kg/day]).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Implementation of a higher-protein formula protocol to patients with COVID-19 modestly reduced volume administration without impacting protein and energy delivery.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jpen.2620","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jpen.2620","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Guidelines recommend prioritizing protein provision while avoiding excessive energy delivery to critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but there are no prospective studies evaluating such a targeted approach in this group. We aimed to evaluate the effect of a “higher-protein formula protocol” on protein, energy, and volume delivery when compared with standard nutrition protocol.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with COVID-19 who received mechanical ventilation for >72 h and enteral nutrition. Before October 2021, the standard nutrition protocol for patients was 0.7 ml/kg/h ideal body weight (IBW) of a 63 g/L protein and 1250 kcal/L formula. From October 2021, we implemented a higher-protein formula protocol for patients with COVID-19. The initial prescription was 0.5 ml/kg/h IBW of a 100 g/L protein and 1260 kcal/L formula with greater emphasis on energy targets being directed by indirect calorimetry when possible. Measured outcomes included protein, energy, and volume delivered.

Results

There were 114 participants (standard protocol, 48; higher-protein protocol, 66) with 1324 days of nutrition support. The median (95% CI) differences in protein, energy, and volume delivery between targeted and standard protocol periods were 0.08 g/kg/day (−0.02 to 0.18 g/kg/day), −1.71 kcal/kg/day (−3.64 to 0.21 kcal/kg/day) and −1.5 ml/kg/day (−2.9 to −0.1 ml/kg/day). Thirty-three patients (standard protocol, 7; higher-protein protocol, 26) had 44 indirect calorimetry assessments. There was no difference in measured energy expenditure over time (increased by 0.49 kcal/kg/day [−0.89 to 1.88 kcal/kg/day]).

Conclusion

Implementation of a higher-protein formula protocol to patients with COVID-19 modestly reduced volume administration without impacting protein and energy delivery.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 重症患者改用高蛋白、低能量目标配方与营养输送之间的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:指南建议优先为 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)重症患者提供蛋白质,同时避免提供过多能量,但目前还没有前瞻性研究对这一群体的针对性方法进行评估。我们旨在评估与标准营养方案相比,"高蛋白配方方案 "对蛋白质、能量和容量供给的影响:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为接受机械通气超过 72 小时并接受肠内营养的 COVID-19 成年患者。2021 年 10 月之前,患者的标准营养方案为每小时 0.7 毫升/千克理想体重(IBW)、63 克/升蛋白质和 1250 千卡/升热量的配方。自 2021 年 10 月起,我们对 COVID-19 患者实施了高蛋白配方方案。初始处方为 0.5 毫升/千克/小时 IBW 的 100 克/升蛋白质和 1260 千卡/升配方,并在可能的情况下通过间接热量测定法更加强调能量目标。测量结果包括蛋白质、能量和输送量:共有 114 名参与者(标准方案 48 人;高蛋白方案 66 人)接受了 1324 天的营养支持。目标方案和标准方案期间蛋白质、能量和容量输送的中位数(95% CI)差异分别为 0.08 克/千克/天(-0.02 至 0.18 克/千克/天)、-1.71 千卡/千克/天(-3.64 至 0.21 千卡/千克/天)和-1.5 毫升/千克/天(-2.9 至-0.1 毫升/千克/天)。33 名患者(标准方案,7 人;高蛋白方案,26 人)进行了 44 次间接热量测定评估。随着时间的推移,测得的能量消耗没有差异(增加了 0.49 千卡/千克/天 [-0.89 至 1.88 千卡/千克/天]):结论:对 COVID-19 患者实施高蛋白配方方案可适度减少给药量,但不会影响蛋白质和能量的输送。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (JPEN) is the premier scientific journal of nutrition and metabolic support. It publishes original peer-reviewed studies that define the cutting edge of basic and clinical research in the field. It explores the science of optimizing the care of patients receiving enteral or IV therapies. Also included: reviews, techniques, brief reports, case reports, and abstracts.
期刊最新文献
Knowledge assessment tool for pediatric parenteral nutrition: A validation study. Association between longitudinal changes in phase angle and mortality rate in adults critically ill with COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study. Association between SMOF lipid and parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis compared with Intralipid in extremely low birth weight infants: A retrospective cohort study. Effects of parenteral nutrition supplemented with beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate on gut-associated lymphoid tissue and morphology in mice. Intravenous tigecycline with selected multichamber bag parenteral nutrition: A compatibility study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1