Perceptions of critically ill individuals with acute and chronic spinal cord injury requiring a tracheostomy tube.

IF 0.7 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spinal Cord Series and Cases Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI:10.1038/s41394-024-00624-7
Christina Weckwerth, Christian Waydhas, Uwe Hamsen, Oliver Cruciger, Aileen Spieckermann, Thomas Armin Schildhauer, Mirko Aach, Robert Gaschler, Christopher Ull
{"title":"Perceptions of critically ill individuals with acute and chronic spinal cord injury requiring a tracheostomy tube.","authors":"Christina Weckwerth, Christian Waydhas, Uwe Hamsen, Oliver Cruciger, Aileen Spieckermann, Thomas Armin Schildhauer, Mirko Aach, Robert Gaschler, Christopher Ull","doi":"10.1038/s41394-024-00624-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Observational study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the perceptions of patients requiring a tracheostomy tube and to identify possible different perceptions in critically ill patients with tracheostomy tubes who have acute (ASCI) or chronic spinal cord injuries (CSCI).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Medical and surgical intensive care units (ICU) and intermediate care unit of the BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum, Germany.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who met the inclusion criteria completed a 25-item questionnaire on two consecutive days regarding their experiences and perceptions in breathing, coughing, pain, speaking, swallowing, and comfort of the tracheostomy tube.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 51 persons with ASCI (n = 31) and CSCI (n = 20) were included with a mean age of 53 years. Individuals with ASCI reported significantly more frequent pain and swallowing problems as compared to individuals with CSCI (p ≤ 0.014) at initial assessment. There were no differences between ASCI and CSCI reported with respect to speaking and overall comfort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is necessary to regularly assess the perceptions of critically ill patients with tracheostomy tubes with ASCI or CSCI in the daily ICU care routine. We were able to assess these perceptions in different categories. For the future, evaluating the perception of individuals with SCI and a tracheostomy should be implemented to their daily routine care.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>DRKS00022073.</p>","PeriodicalId":22079,"journal":{"name":"Spinal Cord Series and Cases","volume":"10 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10933252/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spinal Cord Series and Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-024-00624-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Observational study.

Objectives: To evaluate the perceptions of patients requiring a tracheostomy tube and to identify possible different perceptions in critically ill patients with tracheostomy tubes who have acute (ASCI) or chronic spinal cord injuries (CSCI).

Setting: Medical and surgical intensive care units (ICU) and intermediate care unit of the BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum, Germany.

Methods: Patients who met the inclusion criteria completed a 25-item questionnaire on two consecutive days regarding their experiences and perceptions in breathing, coughing, pain, speaking, swallowing, and comfort of the tracheostomy tube.

Results: A total of 51 persons with ASCI (n = 31) and CSCI (n = 20) were included with a mean age of 53 years. Individuals with ASCI reported significantly more frequent pain and swallowing problems as compared to individuals with CSCI (p ≤ 0.014) at initial assessment. There were no differences between ASCI and CSCI reported with respect to speaking and overall comfort.

Conclusions: It is necessary to regularly assess the perceptions of critically ill patients with tracheostomy tubes with ASCI or CSCI in the daily ICU care routine. We were able to assess these perceptions in different categories. For the future, evaluating the perception of individuals with SCI and a tracheostomy should be implemented to their daily routine care.

Trial registration: DRKS00022073.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
需要气管插管的急性和慢性脊髓损伤重症患者的看法。
研究设计观察性研究:评估需要使用气管造口管的患者对气管造口管的感知,并确定使用气管造口管的急性(ASCI)或慢性脊髓损伤(CSCI)重症患者可能存在的不同感知:地点:德国波鸿 Bergmannsheil BG 大学医院内科和外科重症监护病房(ICU)以及中级监护病房:符合纳入标准的患者连续两天填写了一份包含 25 个项目的问卷,内容涉及他们在呼吸、咳嗽、疼痛、说话、吞咽以及气管插管舒适度方面的体验和感受:共纳入 51 名 ASCI 患者(31 人)和 CSCI 患者(20 人),他们的平均年龄为 53 岁。与 CSCI 患者相比,ASCI 患者在初次评估时报告的疼痛和吞咽困难频率明显更高(P ≤ 0.014)。ASCI患者和CSCI患者在说话和总体舒适度方面没有差异:结论:在重症监护室的日常护理中,有必要定期评估带有气管造瘘管的 ASCI 或 CSCI 重症患者的感受。我们能够对这些感知进行不同类别的评估。今后,应将评估 SCI 和气管切开术患者的感知纳入其日常护理中:试验注册:DRKS00022073。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spinal Cord Series and Cases
Spinal Cord Series and Cases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
92
期刊最新文献
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the "impact on participation and autonomy" (IPA) questionnaire in Indian population with spinal cord injury. Combined nerve and tendon transfer strategy for the restoration of grasp in tetraplegia; a case report. Immediate effect of alone and combined virtual reality, gait-like muscle vibration and transcranial direct current stimulation on neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: a pilot study. Improving quality of care in traumatic spinal column/spinal cord injuries (TSC/SCI) in Iran: a policy brief. Improving the rehabilitation of individuals admitted to England's National Spinal Injuries Centre with traumatic brain injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1