Guidelines for assistive technology service provision - A scoping review.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-12 DOI:10.1080/17483107.2024.2327515
Natasha Layton, Alice Spann, Mehedi Khan, Silvana Contepomi, Evert Jan Hoogerwerf, Diane Bell, Luc de Witte
{"title":"Guidelines for assistive technology service provision - A scoping review.","authors":"Natasha Layton, Alice Spann, Mehedi Khan, Silvana Contepomi, Evert Jan Hoogerwerf, Diane Bell, Luc de Witte","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2327515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite the high unmet need for effective AT provision, multiple service delivery models across different countries, and a shortage of personnel trained in this field, no widely useable and accepted Assistive Technology (AT) service provision guidelines currently exist. This review aims to provide an overview of the literature regarding AT service provision guidelines to inform the development of globally useable AT provision guidance, aligned with contemporary global initiatives to improve access to AT.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The rapid scoping review method used a two-tiered approach to identifying relevant publications: (1) systematic search of academic databases (Medline, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar); (2) consultation with international AT organisations and experts. The search was conducted in March 2023 with no date limitations. Analysis was guided by the TIDE-funded HEART research on quality AT provision and service delivery processes in Europe, as well as the WHO-GATE 5 P framework for strengthening access to AT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>35 publications were identified from various countries, and directed at differing assistive products, personnel, and provision contexts. No established guidelines for AT service provision currently exist. However, despite the variety in contexts, the range of assistive products and the range of stakeholders to whom guidelines are directed, several key service delivery steps were identified that may form part of such guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review offers a strong starting point for developing guidance for AT provision to meet global needs. Careful consideration of vocabulary, process, and application to the diversity of assistive products is recommended in systematizing globally applicable guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"2806-2817"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2327515","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Despite the high unmet need for effective AT provision, multiple service delivery models across different countries, and a shortage of personnel trained in this field, no widely useable and accepted Assistive Technology (AT) service provision guidelines currently exist. This review aims to provide an overview of the literature regarding AT service provision guidelines to inform the development of globally useable AT provision guidance, aligned with contemporary global initiatives to improve access to AT.

Materials and methods: The rapid scoping review method used a two-tiered approach to identifying relevant publications: (1) systematic search of academic databases (Medline, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar); (2) consultation with international AT organisations and experts. The search was conducted in March 2023 with no date limitations. Analysis was guided by the TIDE-funded HEART research on quality AT provision and service delivery processes in Europe, as well as the WHO-GATE 5 P framework for strengthening access to AT.

Results: 35 publications were identified from various countries, and directed at differing assistive products, personnel, and provision contexts. No established guidelines for AT service provision currently exist. However, despite the variety in contexts, the range of assistive products and the range of stakeholders to whom guidelines are directed, several key service delivery steps were identified that may form part of such guidelines.

Conclusions: This review offers a strong starting point for developing guidance for AT provision to meet global needs. Careful consideration of vocabulary, process, and application to the diversity of assistive products is recommended in systematizing globally applicable guidance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
辅助技术服务提供指南--范围界定审查。
目的:尽管有效提供辅助技术的需求尚未得到满足,不同国家存在多种服务提供模式,而且该领域训练有素的人员短缺,但目前尚不存在可广泛使用和公认的辅助技术(AT)服务提供指南。本综述旨在概述有关提供辅助技术服务指南的文献,以便为制定全球可用的辅助技术服务指南提供参考,同时与当代全球改善辅助技术获取途径的倡议保持一致:快速范围界定综述法采用两层方法来确定相关出版物:(1) 对学术数据库(Medline、CINAHL、SCOPUS 和 Google Scholar)进行系统检索;(2) 咨询国际盲人辅助器具组织和专家。检索在 2023 年 3 月进行,没有日期限制。分析以 TIDE 资助的 HEART 研究为指导,该研究涉及欧洲提供优质辅助器具和服务的过程,以及世界卫生组织-GATE 5 P 框架,旨在加强辅助器具的获取:结果:共发现 35 篇来自不同国家的出版物,针对不同的辅助产品、人员和提供环境。目前还没有关于提供辅助器具服务的既定指南。然而,尽管情况各异、辅助产品种类繁多、指南所针对的利益相关者范围广泛,但仍确定了几个关键的服务提供步骤,可作为此类指南的一部分:本综述为制定满足全球需求的辅助器具提供指南提供了一个坚实的起点。建议在将全球适用的指南系统化时,认真考虑词汇、流程以及对各种辅助产品的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
期刊最新文献
Higher education experts' perspectives on incorporating Universal Design (UD) and accessibility into Higher Education (HE) curricula. Effectiveness of the mobile learning HiSense Taxi App for improving taxi drivers' services for individuals with disabilities: a randomized controlled trial. Analysis of the effect of path cross slope on manual wheelchair propulsion. Impact of an omni-directional accessible design on caregiver's wheelchair operability. Agreement of the wheelchair triceps test in face-to-face and synchronous remote assessments in people with spinal cord injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1