Prediction of Cancer Symptom Trajectory Using Longitudinal Electronic Health Record Data and Long Short-Term Memory Neural Network.

IF 3.3 Q2 ONCOLOGY JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1200/CCI.23.00039
Sena Chae, W Nick Street, Naveenkumar Ramaraju, Stephanie Gilbertson-White
{"title":"Prediction of Cancer Symptom Trajectory Using Longitudinal Electronic Health Record Data and Long Short-Term Memory Neural Network.","authors":"Sena Chae, W Nick Street, Naveenkumar Ramaraju, Stephanie Gilbertson-White","doi":"10.1200/CCI.23.00039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Ability to predict symptom severity and progression across treatment trajectories would allow clinicians to provide timely intervention and treatment planning. However, such predictions are difficult because of sparse and inconsistent assessment, and simplistic measures such as the last observed symptom severity are often used. The purpose of this study is to develop a model for predicting future cancer symptom experiences on the basis of past symptom experiences.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective, longitudinal analysis using records of patients with cancer (n = 208) hospitalized between 2008 and 2014. A long short-term memory (LSTM)-based recurrent neural network, a linear regression, and random forest models were trained on previous symptoms experienced and used to predict future symptom trajectories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that at least one of three tested models (LSTM, linear regression, and random forest) outperform predictions based solely on the previous clinical observation. LSTM models significantly outperformed linear regression and random forest models in predicting nausea (<i>P</i> < .1) and psychosocial status (<i>P</i> < .01). Linear regression outperformed all models when predicting oral health (<i>P</i> < .01), while random forest outperformed all models when predicting mobility (<i>P</i> < .01) and nutrition (<i>P</i> < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We can successfully predict patients' symptom trajectories with a prediction model, built with sparse assessment data, using routinely collected nursing documentation. The results of this project can be applied to better individualize symptom management to support cancer patients' quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":51626,"journal":{"name":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10948138/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI.23.00039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Ability to predict symptom severity and progression across treatment trajectories would allow clinicians to provide timely intervention and treatment planning. However, such predictions are difficult because of sparse and inconsistent assessment, and simplistic measures such as the last observed symptom severity are often used. The purpose of this study is to develop a model for predicting future cancer symptom experiences on the basis of past symptom experiences.

Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective, longitudinal analysis using records of patients with cancer (n = 208) hospitalized between 2008 and 2014. A long short-term memory (LSTM)-based recurrent neural network, a linear regression, and random forest models were trained on previous symptoms experienced and used to predict future symptom trajectories.

Results: We found that at least one of three tested models (LSTM, linear regression, and random forest) outperform predictions based solely on the previous clinical observation. LSTM models significantly outperformed linear regression and random forest models in predicting nausea (P < .1) and psychosocial status (P < .01). Linear regression outperformed all models when predicting oral health (P < .01), while random forest outperformed all models when predicting mobility (P < .01) and nutrition (P < .01).

Conclusion: We can successfully predict patients' symptom trajectories with a prediction model, built with sparse assessment data, using routinely collected nursing documentation. The results of this project can be applied to better individualize symptom management to support cancer patients' quality of life.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用纵向电子健康记录数据和长短期记忆神经网络预测癌症症状轨迹
目的:能够预测症状严重程度和整个治疗轨迹的进展,将使临床医生能够提供及时的干预和治疗计划。然而,由于评估稀少且不一致,而且通常使用最后观察到的症状严重程度等简单的测量方法,因此很难进行此类预测。本研究的目的是根据过去的症状体验建立一个预测未来癌症症状体验的模型:我们利用 2008 年至 2014 年期间住院的癌症患者(208 人)的记录进行了回顾性纵向分析。基于长短期记忆(LSTM)的递归神经网络、线性回归和随机森林模型都是根据以往的症状经历进行训练的,并用于预测未来的症状轨迹:我们发现,在三个测试模型(LSTM、线性回归和随机森林)中,至少有一个模型的预测结果优于仅根据先前临床观察结果得出的预测结果。在预测恶心(P < .1)和社会心理状态(P < .01)方面,LSTM 模型的表现明显优于线性回归和随机森林模型。线性回归在预测口腔健康方面的表现优于所有模型(P < .01),而随机森林在预测活动能力(P < .01)和营养状况(P < .01)方面的表现优于所有模型:我们可以利用日常收集的护理文件,通过稀疏的评估数据建立预测模型,成功预测患者的症状轨迹。本项目的结果可用于更好地进行个性化症状管理,以提高癌症患者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
190
期刊最新文献
Increasing Power in Phase III Oncology Trials With Multivariable Regression: An Empirical Assessment of 535 Primary End Point Analyses. Validation of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Clinical Insights Using a Generalized Oncology Natural Language Processing Model. Acknowledgment of Reviewers 2024. Deep Learning Features Can Improve Radiomics-Based Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Prediction. Development and Optimization of a Bladder Cancer Algorithm Using SEER-Medicare Claims Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1