Secondary School Athletic Trainers' Experiences Managing Workplace Organizational-Professional Conflict.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Athletic Training Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.4085/1062-6050-0627.23
Alicia M Pike Lacy, Thomas G Bowman, Stephanie M Singe
{"title":"Secondary School Athletic Trainers' Experiences Managing Workplace Organizational-Professional Conflict.","authors":"Alicia M Pike Lacy, Thomas G Bowman, Stephanie M Singe","doi":"10.4085/1062-6050-0627.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Athletic trainers (ATs) face organizational-professional conflict (OPC), often surrounding return-to-sport decisions. To prioritize patient safety and establish a healthy work environment, OPC must be mitigated, yet few researchers have determined how ATs manage conflicts with stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore ATs' experiences with OPC in the secondary school setting.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Telephone interviews.</p><p><strong>Patients or other participants: </strong>Sixteen ATs (9 females, 7 males; age = 43 ± 11 years; years certified = 17 ± 9; years in their current positions = 9 ± 6).</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>We digitally recorded telephone interviews and had them professionally transcribed. Data saturation guided recruitment efforts and was met. To ensure rigor and trustworthiness of the data, we completed basic member checks along with multiple-analyst triangulation. We analyzed the qualitative data using an interpretive phenomenological approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes emerged effective communication, professional relationships, stakeholder education, and professional experience. Participants used effective communication described as frequent, open, and direct, during interactions with stakeholders to manage OPC. Organizational-professional conflict was reduced when ATs built professional relationships with stakeholders centered on trust and respect. Participants used stakeholder education as a primary strategy for managing OPC by educating stakeholders about prognosis and return-to-sport timelines postinjury and providing rationale for decisions made. Additionally, years of experience served as a mitigating factor of conflict, in that as ATs gained experience and confidence, they perceived less OPC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants suggested various interpersonal relationship development strategies that can be implemented to manage OPC, especially when starting a new position or building rapport with stakeholders. Specifically, educating various stakeholders on reasons for clinical decisions via effective communication and developing strong professional relationships built on mutual respect assisted in avoiding OPC. Since professional experience appears to alleviate conflict, OPC management strategies should be taught during professional preparation and used early during transition to autonomous practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":54875,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Athletic Training","volume":" ","pages":"1042-1049"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11537221/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Athletic Training","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0627.23","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Athletic trainers (ATs) face organizational-professional conflict (OPC), often surrounding return-to-sport decisions. To prioritize patient safety and establish a healthy work environment, OPC must be mitigated, yet few researchers have determined how ATs manage conflicts with stakeholders.

Objective: To explore ATs' experiences with OPC in the secondary school setting.

Design: Qualitative study.

Setting: Telephone interviews.

Patients or other participants: Sixteen ATs (9 females, 7 males; age = 43 ± 11 years; years certified = 17 ± 9; years in their current positions = 9 ± 6).

Data collection and analysis: We digitally recorded telephone interviews and had them professionally transcribed. Data saturation guided recruitment efforts and was met. To ensure rigor and trustworthiness of the data, we completed basic member checks along with multiple-analyst triangulation. We analyzed the qualitative data using an interpretive phenomenological approach.

Results: Four themes emerged effective communication, professional relationships, stakeholder education, and professional experience. Participants used effective communication described as frequent, open, and direct, during interactions with stakeholders to manage OPC. Organizational-professional conflict was reduced when ATs built professional relationships with stakeholders centered on trust and respect. Participants used stakeholder education as a primary strategy for managing OPC by educating stakeholders about prognosis and return-to-sport timelines postinjury and providing rationale for decisions made. Additionally, years of experience served as a mitigating factor of conflict, in that as ATs gained experience and confidence, they perceived less OPC.

Conclusions: Participants suggested various interpersonal relationship development strategies that can be implemented to manage OPC, especially when starting a new position or building rapport with stakeholders. Specifically, educating various stakeholders on reasons for clinical decisions via effective communication and developing strong professional relationships built on mutual respect assisted in avoiding OPC. Since professional experience appears to alleviate conflict, OPC management strategies should be taught during professional preparation and used early during transition to autonomous practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中学运动训练员处理工作场所组织与职业冲突的经验。
背景:运动训练师(ATs)面临着组织-职业冲突(OPC),通常是围绕重返运动场的决定。为了优先考虑患者安全并建立一个健康的工作环境,必须缓解组织-职业冲突,但很少有研究确定运动训练师如何处理与利益相关者的冲突:目的:探讨助产士在中学环境中处理 OPC 的经验:设计:定性研究:患者或其他参与者16 名助教(9 名女性,7 名男性;年龄 = 43±11 岁;获得资格证书的年数 = 17±9;担任当前职务的年数 = 9±6):我们对电话访谈进行了数字录音,并请专业人员进行了转录。数据饱和度指导了招募工作,并得到了满足。为确保数据的严谨性和可信度,我们完成了基本的成员检查和多个分析师的三角测量。我们采用解释现象学方法对定性数据进行了分析:出现了四个主题:有效沟通、专业关系、利益相关者教育和专业经验。在与利益相关者的互动中,参与者使用频繁、开放和直接的有效沟通来管理 OPC。当助产士与利益相关者建立起以信任和尊重为核心的专业关系时,OPC 的发生率就会降低。参与者将利益相关者教育作为管理 OPC 的主要策略,向利益相关者介绍预后和受伤后重返运动场的时间表,并提供所做决定的理由。此外,经验年限也是缓解冲突的一个因素,因为随着康复治疗师经验和信心的增加,他们对 OPC 的感知也会减少:与会者提出了各种人际关系发展策略,可用于管理开放式护理中心,特别是在开始一个新职位或与利益相关者建立友好关系时。具体来说,通过有效沟通教育各利益相关方临床决策的原因,并在相互尊重的基础上发展稳固的专业关系,有助于避免 OPC。由于专业经验似乎可以缓解冲突,因此应在专业准备期间教授 OPC 管理策略,并在过渡到自主实践期间尽早使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Athletic Training
Journal of Athletic Training 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
106
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Athletic Training is to enhance communication among professionals interested in the quality of health care for the physically active through education and research in prevention, evaluation, management and rehabilitation of injuries. The Journal of Athletic Training offers research you can use in daily practice. It keeps you abreast of scientific advancements that ultimately define professional standards of care - something you can''t be without if you''re responsible for the well-being of patients.
期刊最新文献
Cortical Changes of Dual Cognitive-Task Balance Training in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability: A Randomized Trial. Influence of Anterior Talofibular Ligament Injury and Ankle Anterior Displacement on Symptoms in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability. People With Patellofemoral Pain Have Bilateral Deficits in Physical Performance Regardless of Pain Laterality. Prediction of Recurrent Lateral Ankle Sprain and Ankle Pain Using Applied Care Strategies and Patient-Reported Outcomes. Single-Leg Hop Performance After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Ready for Landing but Cleared for Take-Off?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1