Behavioural and ERP evidence of a contrary effect between active and passive suppression of facial expressions

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Biological Psychology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108774
Caifeng Wang , Wenjing Li , Dong Li , Yangtao Liu , Xiangbo Yan , Qian Cui , Zhongqing Jiang
{"title":"Behavioural and ERP evidence of a contrary effect between active and passive suppression of facial expressions","authors":"Caifeng Wang ,&nbsp;Wenjing Li ,&nbsp;Dong Li ,&nbsp;Yangtao Liu ,&nbsp;Xiangbo Yan ,&nbsp;Qian Cui ,&nbsp;Zhongqing Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There has been disagreement regarding the relationship among the three components (subjective experience, external performance, and physiological response) of emotional responses. To investigate this issue further, this study compared the effects of active and passive suppression of facial expressions on subjective experiences and event-related potentials (ERPs) through two experiments. The two methods of expression suppression produced opposite patterns of ERPs for negative emotional stimuli: compared with the free-viewing condition, active suppression of expression decreased, while passive suppression increased the amplitude of the late positive potential (LPP) when viewing negative emotional stimuli. Further, while active suppression had no effect on participants’ emotional experience, passive suppression enhanced their emotional experience. Among the three components of emotional responses, facial expressions are more closely related to the physiological response of the brain than to subjective experience, and whether the suppression was initiated by participants determines the decrease or increase in physiological response of the brain (i.e. LPP). The findings revealed the important role of individual subjective initiative in modulating the relationship among the components of emotional response, which provides new insights into effectively emotional regulation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55372,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051124000334","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There has been disagreement regarding the relationship among the three components (subjective experience, external performance, and physiological response) of emotional responses. To investigate this issue further, this study compared the effects of active and passive suppression of facial expressions on subjective experiences and event-related potentials (ERPs) through two experiments. The two methods of expression suppression produced opposite patterns of ERPs for negative emotional stimuli: compared with the free-viewing condition, active suppression of expression decreased, while passive suppression increased the amplitude of the late positive potential (LPP) when viewing negative emotional stimuli. Further, while active suppression had no effect on participants’ emotional experience, passive suppression enhanced their emotional experience. Among the three components of emotional responses, facial expressions are more closely related to the physiological response of the brain than to subjective experience, and whether the suppression was initiated by participants determines the decrease or increase in physiological response of the brain (i.e. LPP). The findings revealed the important role of individual subjective initiative in modulating the relationship among the components of emotional response, which provides new insights into effectively emotional regulation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主动和被动抑制面部表情之间存在相反效应的行为和 ERP 证据。
关于情绪反应的三个组成部分(主观体验、外部表现和生理反应)之间的关系一直存在分歧。为了进一步研究这个问题,本研究通过两个实验比较了主动和被动抑制面部表情对主观体验和事件相关电位(ERPs)的影响。在观看负面情绪刺激时,与自由观看条件相比,主动抑制表情会降低晚期正电位(LPP)的振幅,而被动抑制会增加晚期正电位(LPP)的振幅。此外,主动抑制对参与者的情绪体验没有影响,而被动抑制则增强了他们的情绪体验。在情绪反应的三个组成部分中,面部表情与大脑生理反应的关系比与主观体验的关系更为密切,而抑制是否由参与者发起决定了大脑生理反应(即 LPP)的减弱或增强。研究结果揭示了个体主观能动性在调节情绪反应各组成部分之间关系中的重要作用,这为有效的情绪调节提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Psychology
Biological Psychology 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
146
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Biological Psychology publishes original scientific papers on the biological aspects of psychological states and processes. Biological aspects include electrophysiology and biochemical assessments during psychological experiments as well as biologically induced changes in psychological function. Psychological investigations based on biological theories are also of interest. All aspects of psychological functioning, including psychopathology, are germane. The Journal concentrates on work with human subjects, but may consider work with animal subjects if conceptually related to issues in human biological psychology.
期刊最新文献
The impact of threat of shock on memory for threat-irrelevant information: Evidence for a role of reduced semantic organization. The association between interoception and olfactory affective responses. Corrigendum to: "Neural mechanisms of inhibitory control in preadolescent irritability: Insights from the ABCD study" [Biological Psychology 192 (2024) 108856]. Decreased inter-hemispheric connectivity predicts a coherent retrieval of auditory symbolic material. Subjective Cognitive Decline is associated with altered patterns of brain activity and connectivity during performance of an old/new recognition memory task.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1