Air emission and health impacts of a US industrial energy efficiency program

IF 3.2 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Efficiency Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI:10.1007/s12053-024-10210-3
Elaheh Safaei Kouchaksaraei, Kerry Elizabeth Kelly
{"title":"Air emission and health impacts of a US industrial energy efficiency program","authors":"Elaheh Safaei Kouchaksaraei,&nbsp;Kerry Elizabeth Kelly","doi":"10.1007/s12053-024-10210-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Energy efficiency opportunities in the industrial sector can reduce air emissions and benefit human health. One national-level energy efficiency program, the Department of Energy (DOE)-funded Industrial Assessment Center (IAC), provides US manufacturing facilities with cost-effective energy efficiency recommendations. However, the effect of the IAC on air quality and human health has not been explored. While several studies have evaluated the health impacts of air emissions reduction associated with energy efficiency, most of them did not consider regional differences in electricity grid profiles. These differences can change both emissions and health outcomes. This study focuses on air quality and health impacts of electricity and natural gas-related recommendations from the IAC program in 2022. It estimates 248 GWh of electricity, and 1.1E6 MMBtu of natural gas savings will result from the recommendations. Using the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)’s Avoided Emissions and GeneRation Tool (AVERT) to estimate regional electricity emissions, published natural gas emission rates, and EPA’s co-benefit risk assessment (COBRA) tool, the total annual health outcomes associated with these savings range from 4.85 to 16.9 million USD (2023). This range includes different NO<sub>x</sub> emission rates and high and low COBRA estimates. Additionally, we introduce an energy savings health estimator (ESHE) tool that calculates air emissions and associated health outcomes of energy savings measures. We also apply it to the 2022 IAC recommendations and compare the health outcomes to those calculated using AVERT and COBRA separately. This tool can quickly estimate the health impacts of various energy efficiency projects or programs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":537,"journal":{"name":"Energy Efficiency","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Efficiency","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12053-024-10210-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Energy efficiency opportunities in the industrial sector can reduce air emissions and benefit human health. One national-level energy efficiency program, the Department of Energy (DOE)-funded Industrial Assessment Center (IAC), provides US manufacturing facilities with cost-effective energy efficiency recommendations. However, the effect of the IAC on air quality and human health has not been explored. While several studies have evaluated the health impacts of air emissions reduction associated with energy efficiency, most of them did not consider regional differences in electricity grid profiles. These differences can change both emissions and health outcomes. This study focuses on air quality and health impacts of electricity and natural gas-related recommendations from the IAC program in 2022. It estimates 248 GWh of electricity, and 1.1E6 MMBtu of natural gas savings will result from the recommendations. Using the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)’s Avoided Emissions and GeneRation Tool (AVERT) to estimate regional electricity emissions, published natural gas emission rates, and EPA’s co-benefit risk assessment (COBRA) tool, the total annual health outcomes associated with these savings range from 4.85 to 16.9 million USD (2023). This range includes different NOx emission rates and high and low COBRA estimates. Additionally, we introduce an energy savings health estimator (ESHE) tool that calculates air emissions and associated health outcomes of energy savings measures. We also apply it to the 2022 IAC recommendations and compare the health outcomes to those calculated using AVERT and COBRA separately. This tool can quickly estimate the health impacts of various energy efficiency projects or programs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国工业能效计划对空气排放和健康的影响
摘要 工业领域的节能机会可以减少空气排放,有益于人类健康。能源部(DOE)资助的工业评估中心(IAC)是一项国家级能效计划,它为美国的制造设施提供具有成本效益的能效建议。然而,IAC 对空气质量和人类健康的影响尚未得到探讨。虽然有几项研究评估了与能源效率相关的空气减排对健康的影响,但其中大多数都没有考虑电网分布的地区差异。这些差异会改变排放和健康结果。本研究重点关注 2022 年 IAC 计划中与电力和天然气相关的建议对空气质量和健康的影响。据估计,这些建议将节省 248 千兆瓦时的电力和 1.1E6 百万英热单位的天然气。利用环境保护局 (EPA) 的避免排放和基因重组工具 (AVERT) 估算区域电力排放量、已公布的天然气排放率以及 EPA 的共同效益风险评估 (COBRA) 工具,与这些节约相关的年度健康成果总额介于 485 万美元至 1690 万美元之间(2023 年)。这一范围包括不同的氮氧化物排放率以及高和低 COBRA 估计值。此外,我们还引入了节能健康估算工具(ESHE),用于计算空气排放和节能措施的相关健康结果。我们还将其应用于 2022 年 IAC 建议,并将健康结果与分别使用 AVERT 和 COBRA 计算得出的结果进行比较。该工具可快速估算各种能效项目或计划对健康的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Efficiency
Energy Efficiency ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.50%
发文量
59
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Efficiency covers wide-ranging aspects of energy efficiency in the residential, tertiary, industrial and transport sectors. Coverage includes a number of different topics and disciplines including energy efficiency policies at local, regional, national and international levels; long term impact of energy efficiency; technologies to improve energy efficiency; consumer behavior and the dynamics of consumption; socio-economic impacts of energy efficiency measures; energy efficiency as a virtual utility; transportation issues; building issues; energy management systems and energy services; energy planning and risk assessment; energy efficiency in developing countries and economies in transition; non-energy benefits of energy efficiency and opportunities for policy integration; energy education and training, and emerging technologies. See Aims and Scope for more details.
期刊最新文献
A step towards energy efficiency in G7 countries: analyzing the role of economic complexity and shadow economy on energy intensity Pathways to commercial building plug and process load efficiency and control Wind-driven and buoyancy effects for modeling natural ventilation in buildings at urban scale A mixed-method approach to study the impacts of energy micro-generation combined with appliance-level feedback on everyday practices Do environment-related technologies, urbanization, trade openness, and income impact energy consumption and intensity?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1