The whistle-blower as a private enforcement tool in the EU banking sector: call for clarity

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Banking Regulation Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI:10.1057/s41261-024-00238-x
Dimitrios Kafteranis
{"title":"The whistle-blower as a private enforcement tool in the EU banking sector: call for clarity","authors":"Dimitrios Kafteranis","doi":"10.1057/s41261-024-00238-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Following the financial crises and several scandals, the issue of whistleblowing has re-emerged for the banking and financial sector. These events led the EU to adopt provisions on whistleblowing in several EU legal acts concerning the banking sector such as in the Single Supervisory Mechanism. On October 2019, the EU adopted the Directive on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law (Directive on the protection of whistle-blowers). The EU decided to offer to the Member States a new enforcement tool, inspired, probably, by the long-existing US model on the use of whistle-blowers as private enforcers. The first part of the article will analyse the relationship between private enforcement and whistleblowing under EU law. In the second part of this article, whistleblowing in the EU banking sector will be scrutinised and it will be argued that the sectoral provisions in the banking sector should be replaced by the Directive to ensure clarity for whistle-blowers.</p>","PeriodicalId":15105,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Banking Regulation","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Banking Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-024-00238-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Following the financial crises and several scandals, the issue of whistleblowing has re-emerged for the banking and financial sector. These events led the EU to adopt provisions on whistleblowing in several EU legal acts concerning the banking sector such as in the Single Supervisory Mechanism. On October 2019, the EU adopted the Directive on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law (Directive on the protection of whistle-blowers). The EU decided to offer to the Member States a new enforcement tool, inspired, probably, by the long-existing US model on the use of whistle-blowers as private enforcers. The first part of the article will analyse the relationship between private enforcement and whistleblowing under EU law. In the second part of this article, whistleblowing in the EU banking sector will be scrutinised and it will be argued that the sectoral provisions in the banking sector should be replaced by the Directive to ensure clarity for whistle-blowers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将举报人作为欧盟银行业的私人执法工具:呼吁明确规定
在金融危机和几起丑闻之后,举报问题再次出现在银行和金融领域。这些事件促使欧盟在《单一监管机制》等几部与银行业有关的欧盟法案中通过了有关举报的规定。2019 年 10 月,欧盟通过了《关于保护违反欧盟法律的举报人的指令》(《关于保护举报人的指令》)。欧盟决定向成员国提供一种新的执法工具,其灵感可能来自美国长期存在的利用举报人作为私人执法者的模式。文章的第一部分将分析欧盟法律中私人执法与举报之间的关系。文章的第二部分将仔细研究欧盟银行业的举报问题,并认为银行业的部门规定应由《指令》取代,以确保举报人的知情权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Under the guidance of its highly respected Editors and an eminent and truly international Editorial Board?Journal of Banking Regulation?has established itself as one of the leading sources of authoritative and detailed information on all aspects of law and regulation affecting banking institutions.Journal of Banking Regulation?publishes in each quarterly issue detailed briefings analyses and updates which are of direct relevance to practitioners working in the field while meeting the highest intellectual standards.Journal of Banking Regulation?publishes the latest thinking and best practice on:Basel I II and IIIModels for banking supervisionInternational accounting standardsDeposit protectionEnforcement decisions in banking regulation and supervisionCross-border competition in banking servicesCorporate governance in banksHarmonisation in banking marketsSupervising credit riskAnti-money laundering legislation and regulationsMonetary integrationRisk capital and capital adequacySystemic risk in banking operationsCross-border regulationCross-border bank insolvencyModels for banking riskEssential reading for:central bankersbanking supervisorsfinancial regulatorsbankerscompliance officersheads of risk managementpolicy makersbank associationslawyers specialising in banking lawaccountantsinternal and external bank auditorsacademics and researchers
期刊最新文献
Assessment of banks' resilience and financial stress in countercyclical martial law conditions The impact of house prices on banking stability in Vietnam: the moderating role of investor sentiment Indebtedness and labor risk sorting across consumer lender types in Chile Enforcement of sanctions within the SSM by European and national authorities: unravelling jurisdiction and accountability under Union law The rise and fall of Silvergate Bank: lessons for prudential regulation of crypto-sector banking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1