Retrospective analysis of medium-term outcomes following anterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery performed in a tertiary spinal surgical centre.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-13 DOI:10.1308/rcsann.2023.0082
T Srirangarajan, K Eseonu, B Fakouri, P Liantis, P Panteliadis, J Lucas, T Ember, M Harris, M Tyrrell, B Sandford, J R Panchmatia
{"title":"Retrospective analysis of medium-term outcomes following anterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery performed in a tertiary spinal surgical centre.","authors":"T Srirangarajan, K Eseonu, B Fakouri, P Liantis, P Panteliadis, J Lucas, T Ember, M Harris, M Tyrrell, B Sandford, J R Panchmatia","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) can treat spondylolisthesis, degenerative disc disease and pseudoarthrosis. This approach facilitates complete discectomy, disc space distraction, indirect decompression of neural foramina and placement of large interbody devices. Several intra- and postoperative complications can be attributed to the anterior approach: vascular/visceral injury, hypogastric plexus injury and urogenital consequences. Spine-specific complications include implant migration, graft failure, pseudoarthrosis and persistent symptomology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study reviewed patient demographics, medium-term outcomes and complication rates following ALIF surgery performed over a 5-year period. A total of 110 consecutive patients had undergone ALIF surgery at a single tertiary spinal centre. The database was reviewed with a primary outcome of identifying postoperative 90-day complications and whether a revision anterior operation was required after primary ALIF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No patients required revision anterior operation after their primary ALIF surgery by final follow-up. Out of 110 patients, 11 (10%) recorded a complication attributed to the anterior stage of their operation within 90 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our 90-day complication rate of 10% lies within the 2.6% acute complication and 40% overall complications rates described in previous literature. The risk of vascular/visceral injury is significant (3%) and we recommend that ALIF be performed as a dual surgeon procedure with a vascular-trained access surgeon accompanying the spinal surgeon. ALIF is a valid revision surgical option for failed posterior approaches leading to complications such as pseudoarthrosis. In our sample, 89% of patients were managed with posterior fixation to augment the anterior fusion as, biomechanically, this is a proven construct.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11217818/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2023.0082","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) can treat spondylolisthesis, degenerative disc disease and pseudoarthrosis. This approach facilitates complete discectomy, disc space distraction, indirect decompression of neural foramina and placement of large interbody devices. Several intra- and postoperative complications can be attributed to the anterior approach: vascular/visceral injury, hypogastric plexus injury and urogenital consequences. Spine-specific complications include implant migration, graft failure, pseudoarthrosis and persistent symptomology.

Methods: This retrospective study reviewed patient demographics, medium-term outcomes and complication rates following ALIF surgery performed over a 5-year period. A total of 110 consecutive patients had undergone ALIF surgery at a single tertiary spinal centre. The database was reviewed with a primary outcome of identifying postoperative 90-day complications and whether a revision anterior operation was required after primary ALIF.

Results: No patients required revision anterior operation after their primary ALIF surgery by final follow-up. Out of 110 patients, 11 (10%) recorded a complication attributed to the anterior stage of their operation within 90 days.

Conclusions: Our 90-day complication rate of 10% lies within the 2.6% acute complication and 40% overall complications rates described in previous literature. The risk of vascular/visceral injury is significant (3%) and we recommend that ALIF be performed as a dual surgeon procedure with a vascular-trained access surgeon accompanying the spinal surgeon. ALIF is a valid revision surgical option for failed posterior approaches leading to complications such as pseudoarthrosis. In our sample, 89% of patients were managed with posterior fixation to augment the anterior fusion as, biomechanically, this is a proven construct.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对一家三级脊柱外科中心进行的前路腰椎椎间融合手术中期疗效的回顾性分析。
导言:腰椎前路椎体间融合术(ALIF)可治疗脊柱滑脱症、椎间盘退行性病变和假关节。这种方法有利于进行完全椎间盘切除、椎间盘间隙牵开、神经孔间接减压和放置大型椎体间融合器。一些术中和术后并发症可归因于前路:血管/内脏损伤、胃下神经丛损伤和泌尿生殖系统后果。脊柱特有的并发症包括植入物移位、移植物失败、假关节和持续症状:这项回顾性研究回顾了 5 年间 ALIF 手术的患者人口统计学特征、中期疗效和并发症发生率。共有110名患者在一家三级脊柱中心接受了ALIF手术。对数据库进行审查的主要目的是确定术后90天的并发症以及初次ALIF术后是否需要进行翻修前路手术:结果:在最终随访中,没有患者在初次 ALIF 手术后需要进行翻修前路手术。在110名患者中,有11人(10%)在90天内发生了前路手术并发症:我们的 90 天并发症发生率为 10%,与之前文献中描述的 2.6% 的急性并发症发生率和 40% 的总体并发症发生率相当。血管/内脏损伤的风险很高(3%),因此我们建议ALIF手术应由两名外科医生共同完成,一名接受过血管入路培训的外科医生应与脊柱外科医生同行。对于导致假关节等并发症的失败后路手术,ALIF 是一种有效的翻修手术选择。在我们的样本中,89%的患者采用后路固定来增强前路融合,因为从生物力学角度来看,这是一种行之有效的结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
316
期刊介绍: The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England is the official scholarly research journal of the Royal College of Surgeons and is published eight times a year in January, February, March, April, May, July, September and November. The main aim of the journal is to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed papers that relate to all branches of surgery. The Annals also includes letters and comments, a regular technical section, controversial topics, CORESS feedback and book reviews. The editorial board is composed of experts from all the surgical specialties.
期刊最新文献
Impact of endoscopic laser cricopharyngeal myotomy on lower oesophageal sphincter physiology. Kommerell's diverticulum: an unusual cause of unilateral vocal cord palsy? The novel use of a vacuum-assisted closure dressing in the management of Fournier's gangrene. Quality assessment of online patient information on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using the modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients tool. A new setup for single surgeon paediatric supracondylar fracture pinning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1