Soil-specific outcomes in the OECD 216 Nitrogen Transformation Test

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management Pub Date : 2024-03-14 DOI:10.1002/ieam.4913
Christopher J. Sweeney, Melanie Bottoms, Lennart Schulz
{"title":"Soil-specific outcomes in the OECD 216 Nitrogen Transformation Test","authors":"Christopher J. Sweeney,&nbsp;Melanie Bottoms,&nbsp;Lennart Schulz","doi":"10.1002/ieam.4913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 216 test guideline investigates the impact of agrochemicals on soil nitrogen transformation. After an evaluation of 465 OECD 216 studies, we describe two distinct yet contrasting outcomes in control nontreated samples that are possible in this testing framework, which we term the “rise” (consistent increases in nitrate concentrations throughout the test period) and “dip” (initial decline in nitrate concentration between Days 0–7, followed by a net-generation of nitrate across Days 7–28) responses. We raise significant concerns that control data from standardized, internationally recognized test guidelines can demonstrate such dissimilar patterns. We propose that, when present, the dip response undermines the intended functioning of the test system and removes the ability to draw appropriate ecotoxicological inferences from the data. In this work, we hypothesize the dip response is a product of conducting the study in low nitrogen content soils. Our results indicate that the dip response can be alleviated by using ammonium sulfate as an immediately available inorganic nitrogen source in place of the guideline-mandated complex, organic lucerne meal, demonstrating the influence of nitrogen availability and accessibility. However, not all low nitrogen soils exhibited the dip response, indicating the involvement of additional unidentified factors. Using our data and real-world regulatory examples, we advocate that datasets displaying the dip response should not be considered valid OECD 216 studies due to the influence of soil properties precluding an assessment of whether any impacts observed are driven solely by the test compound in question or are instead a product of the soil used. We propose methods to account for these soil-specific responses that could be integrated into the conduct and interpretation of OECD 216 studies. Such amendments will improve the reliability and robustness of the study system and enhance confidence in ecotoxicological conclusions derived from OECD 216 datasets. <i>Integr Environ Assess Manag</i> 2024;20:1611–1624. © 2024 SETAC</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":"20 5","pages":"1611-1624"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ieam.4913","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 216 test guideline investigates the impact of agrochemicals on soil nitrogen transformation. After an evaluation of 465 OECD 216 studies, we describe two distinct yet contrasting outcomes in control nontreated samples that are possible in this testing framework, which we term the “rise” (consistent increases in nitrate concentrations throughout the test period) and “dip” (initial decline in nitrate concentration between Days 0–7, followed by a net-generation of nitrate across Days 7–28) responses. We raise significant concerns that control data from standardized, internationally recognized test guidelines can demonstrate such dissimilar patterns. We propose that, when present, the dip response undermines the intended functioning of the test system and removes the ability to draw appropriate ecotoxicological inferences from the data. In this work, we hypothesize the dip response is a product of conducting the study in low nitrogen content soils. Our results indicate that the dip response can be alleviated by using ammonium sulfate as an immediately available inorganic nitrogen source in place of the guideline-mandated complex, organic lucerne meal, demonstrating the influence of nitrogen availability and accessibility. However, not all low nitrogen soils exhibited the dip response, indicating the involvement of additional unidentified factors. Using our data and real-world regulatory examples, we advocate that datasets displaying the dip response should not be considered valid OECD 216 studies due to the influence of soil properties precluding an assessment of whether any impacts observed are driven solely by the test compound in question or are instead a product of the soil used. We propose methods to account for these soil-specific responses that could be integrated into the conduct and interpretation of OECD 216 studies. Such amendments will improve the reliability and robustness of the study system and enhance confidence in ecotoxicological conclusions derived from OECD 216 datasets. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;20:1611–1624. © 2024 SETAC

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
OECD 216 氮转化试验中的特定土壤结果。
经济合作与发展组织(OECD)216 测试指南调查了农用化学品对土壤氮转化的影响。在对 465 项 OECD 216 研究进行评估后,我们描述了在这一测试框架中可能出现的未处理对照样本中的两种截然不同但又截然相反的结果,我们称之为 "上升"(在整个测试期间硝酸盐浓度持续上升)和 "下降"(硝酸盐浓度在第 0-7 天开始下降,随后在第 7-28 天出现硝酸盐净生成)反应。我们对国际公认的标准化测试指南中的对照数据能显示出如此不同的模式表示严重关切。我们认为,一旦出现浸渍反应,就会破坏测试系统的预期功能,并使我们无法从数据中得出适当的生态毒理学推论。在这项工作中,我们假设浸渍反应是在含氮量低的土壤中进行研究的产物。我们的研究结果表明,使用硫酸铵作为立即可用的无机氮源来代替指南要求的复合有机苜蓿粉,可以缓解浸渍反应,这证明了氮的可用性和可及性的影响。然而,并非所有的低氮土壤都表现出浸渍反应,这表明还有其他不明因素的影响。利用我们的数据和现实世界中的监管实例,我们主张不应将显示浸渍反应的数据集视为有效的 OECD 216 研究,因为土壤特性的影响使我们无法评估观察到的任何影响是完全由相关测试化合物引起的,还是由所使用土壤的产物引起的。我们提出了考虑这些土壤特异性反应的方法,这些方法可纳入 OECD 216 研究的进行和解释中。这种修正将提高研究系统的可靠性和稳健性,并增强人们对从 OECD 216 数据集得出的生态毒理学结论的信心。Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;00:1-14。© 2024 SETAC.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCESTOXICOLOGY&nbs-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM) publishes the science underpinning environmental decision making and problem solving. Papers submitted to IEAM must link science and technical innovations to vexing regional or global environmental issues in one or more of the following core areas: Science-informed regulation, policy, and decision making Health and ecological risk and impact assessment Restoration and management of damaged ecosystems Sustaining ecosystems Managing large-scale environmental change Papers published in these broad fields of study are connected by an array of interdisciplinary engineering, management, and scientific themes, which collectively reflect the interconnectedness of the scientific, social, and environmental challenges facing our modern global society: Methods for environmental quality assessment; forecasting across a number of ecosystem uses and challenges (systems-based, cost-benefit, ecosystem services, etc.); measuring or predicting ecosystem change and adaptation Approaches that connect policy and management tools; harmonize national and international environmental regulation; merge human well-being with ecological management; develop and sustain the function of ecosystems; conceptualize, model and apply concepts of spatial and regional sustainability Assessment and management frameworks that incorporate conservation, life cycle, restoration, and sustainability; considerations for climate-induced adaptation, change and consequences, and vulnerability Environmental management applications using risk-based approaches; considerations for protecting and fostering biodiversity, as well as enhancement or protection of ecosystem services and resiliency.
期刊最新文献
Addressing Water Scarcity to Achieve Climate Resilience and Human Health. Application of artificial intelligence for nutrient estimation in surface water bodies of basins with intensive agriculture. Assessing bioaccumulation with biomagnification factors from dietary bioaccumulation tests. Metal-rich lacustrine sediments from legacy mining perpetuate copper exposure to aquatic-riparian food webs. Rhamnolipid: nature-based solution for the removal of microplastics from the aquatic environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1