A comprehensive performance evaluation, comparison, and integration of computational methods for detecting and estimating cross-contamination of human samples in cancer next-generation sequencing analysis

IF 4 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Journal of Biomedical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-03-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104625
Huijuan Chen , Bing Wang , Lili Cai , Xiaotian Yang , Yali Hu , Yiran Zhang , Xue Leng , Wen Liu , Dongjie Fan , Beifang Niu , Qiming Zhou
{"title":"A comprehensive performance evaluation, comparison, and integration of computational methods for detecting and estimating cross-contamination of human samples in cancer next-generation sequencing analysis","authors":"Huijuan Chen ,&nbsp;Bing Wang ,&nbsp;Lili Cai ,&nbsp;Xiaotian Yang ,&nbsp;Yali Hu ,&nbsp;Yiran Zhang ,&nbsp;Xue Leng ,&nbsp;Wen Liu ,&nbsp;Dongjie Fan ,&nbsp;Beifang Niu ,&nbsp;Qiming Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cross-sample contamination is one of the major issues in next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based molecular assays. This type of contamination, even at very low levels, can significantly impact the results of an analysis, especially in the detection of somatic alterations in tumor samples. Several contamination identification tools have been developed and implemented as a crucial quality-control step in the routine NGS bioinformatic pipeline. However, no study has been published to comprehensively and systematically investigate, evaluate, and compare these computational methods in the cancer NGS analysis. In this study, we comprehensively investigated nine state-of-the-art computational methods for detecting cross-sample contamination. To explore their application in cancer NGS analysis, we further compared the performance of five representative tools by qualitative and quantitative analyses using <em>in silico</em> and simulated experimental NGS data. The results showed that Conpair achieved the best performance for identifying contamination and predicting the level of contamination in solid tumors NGS analysis. Moreover, based on Conpair, we developed a Python script, Contamination Source Predictor (ConSPr), to identify the source of contamination. We anticipate that this comprehensive survey and the proposed tool for predicting the source of contamination will assist researchers in selecting appropriate cross-contamination detection tools in cancer NGS analysis and inspire the development of computational methods for detecting sample cross-contamination and identifying its source in the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046424000431","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cross-sample contamination is one of the major issues in next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based molecular assays. This type of contamination, even at very low levels, can significantly impact the results of an analysis, especially in the detection of somatic alterations in tumor samples. Several contamination identification tools have been developed and implemented as a crucial quality-control step in the routine NGS bioinformatic pipeline. However, no study has been published to comprehensively and systematically investigate, evaluate, and compare these computational methods in the cancer NGS analysis. In this study, we comprehensively investigated nine state-of-the-art computational methods for detecting cross-sample contamination. To explore their application in cancer NGS analysis, we further compared the performance of five representative tools by qualitative and quantitative analyses using in silico and simulated experimental NGS data. The results showed that Conpair achieved the best performance for identifying contamination and predicting the level of contamination in solid tumors NGS analysis. Moreover, based on Conpair, we developed a Python script, Contamination Source Predictor (ConSPr), to identify the source of contamination. We anticipate that this comprehensive survey and the proposed tool for predicting the source of contamination will assist researchers in selecting appropriate cross-contamination detection tools in cancer NGS analysis and inspire the development of computational methods for detecting sample cross-contamination and identifying its source in the future.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症新一代测序分析中检测和估计人类样本交叉污染的计算方法的综合性能评估、比较和整合。
跨样本污染是基于新一代测序(NGS)的分子检测中的主要问题之一。这类污染即使含量很低,也会严重影响分析结果,尤其是在检测肿瘤样本中的体细胞改变时。作为常规 NGS 生物信息管道中的关键质量控制步骤,已经开发并实施了几种污染识别工具。然而,目前还没有任何研究对这些计算方法在癌症 NGS 分析中的应用进行全面系统的调查、评估和比较。在本研究中,我们全面调查了九种最先进的检测跨样本污染的计算方法。为了探索这些方法在癌症 NGS 分析中的应用,我们进一步使用硅学和模拟实验 NGS 数据,通过定性和定量分析比较了五种代表性工具的性能。结果表明,在实体瘤 NGS 分析中,Conpair 在识别污染和预测污染程度方面表现最佳。此外,在 Conpair 的基础上,我们开发了一个 Python 脚本--污染源预测器(ConSPr)--来识别污染源。我们希望这项全面的调查和所提出的污染源预测工具能帮助研究人员在癌症 NGS 分析中选择合适的交叉污染检测工具,并激励他们在未来开发用于检测样本交叉污染和识别污染源的计算方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Journal of Biomedical Informatics 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
243
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.
期刊最新文献
FuseLinker: Leveraging LLM’s pre-trained text embeddings and domain knowledge to enhance GNN-based link prediction on biomedical knowledge graphs Clinical outcome-guided deep temporal clustering for disease progression subtyping. Cross-domain visual prompting with spatial proximity knowledge distillation for histological image classification Advancing cancer driver gene identification through an integrative network and pathway approach Proxy endpoints — bridging clinical trials and real world data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1