Cardiovascular Safety of Romosozumab vs PTH Analogues for Osteoporosis Treatment: A Propensity-Score-Matched Cohort Study.

Abstract

Context: Romosozumab, a monoclonal sclerostin antibody, is a recently approved highly potent antiosteoporotic agent with osteoanabolic properties. Clinical use of romosozumab is hindered by the fear of adverse cardiovascular (CV) events raised following the pivotal ARCH trial.

Objective: This work aimed to assess real-world CV safety of romosozumab vs alternative osteoanabolic therapies used for treatment of severe osteoporosis.

Methods: Data were obtained from TriNetX, a global federated health research network including real-time electronic medical records from 113 health care organizations with 136 460 930 patients across 16 countries at time of analysis. Inclusion criteria were age 40 years or older, a diagnosis of osteoporosis and prescription of romosozumab or a parathyroid hormone (PTH) analogue (teriparatide/abaloparatide) during August 2019 through August 2022. Propensity-score-matched cohorts were created 1:1 using demographic variables, comorbidities, and medications. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the probability of the outcomes. Outcome measures included incident 3-point major adverse CV event or death (3P-MACE) during 1-year of follow-up after the initial prescription.

Results: A total of 5626 and 15 986 patients met the criteria for romosozumab and PTH analogue cohorts, respectively, with 5610 patients per group following propensity score matching. 3P-MACE was significantly less frequent in the romosozumab vs PTH analogue cohort (158 vs 211 patients with an outcome; P = .003) with reductions in the individual components of the composite outcome: myocardial ischemic events (31 vs 58; P = .003); cerebrovascular events 56 vs 79; P = .037; deaths (83 vs 104; P = .099).

Conclusion: In a diverse, real-world setting, prescription of romosozumab for osteoporosis is associated with fewer adverse CV events when compared to PTH analogue therapy.