Bioeconomy in countries of the Mekong region: Stakeholder understanding and perceptions in Thailand, Vietnam, and Laos

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECONOMICS Forest Policy and Economics Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103190
Radek Rinn , Martin Jankovský , Petra Palátová , Sandra Paola García-Jácome , Alice Sharp , Prasit Wangpakapattanawong , Nataša Lovrić , Manh Vu Van , Minh Doan Thi Nhat , Bounheuang Ninchaleune , Inta Chanthavong , Kongchan Doungmala
{"title":"Bioeconomy in countries of the Mekong region: Stakeholder understanding and perceptions in Thailand, Vietnam, and Laos","authors":"Radek Rinn ,&nbsp;Martin Jankovský ,&nbsp;Petra Palátová ,&nbsp;Sandra Paola García-Jácome ,&nbsp;Alice Sharp ,&nbsp;Prasit Wangpakapattanawong ,&nbsp;Nataša Lovrić ,&nbsp;Manh Vu Van ,&nbsp;Minh Doan Thi Nhat ,&nbsp;Bounheuang Ninchaleune ,&nbsp;Inta Chanthavong ,&nbsp;Kongchan Doungmala","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aimed to analyse, evaluate, and compare the status of the bioeconomy concept in the Mekong region in three countries, namely Thailand, Vietnam, and Laos. The research questions focused on the perception of the bioeconomy concept by the governments and industries, the barriers to its development, and the prerequisites for its development in the region, and also explored whether it is reflected in the related existing official strategic documents. The study used a combined methodology that included qualitative document analysis and an online questionnaire distributed to public and private sector representatives in all three countries, analysed through Advocacy Coalition Framework theory lenses. The results showed that while the bioeconomy is acknowledged in many institutions of the South-East Asian countries and closely connected to the sustainable development and circular economy, there is a lack of a clear bioeconomy vision, resulting in the absence of dedicated bioeconomy strategies in these countries. The results indicated that the bioeconomy concept is a new emerging concept in these countries, which was perceived as the most important barrier to its development. Unfortunately, there is limited expert knowledge of the bioeconomy, and insufficient support from the state-level, followed by low technological development. The study also highlighted the irreplaceable role of the forest-based sector in the bioeconomy concept. The authors suggest further research on the economic valuation of the bioeconomy to promote its adoption, as well as a greater involvement of key policymakers in the individual countries for its further development, specifically in Thailand and Vietnam, or a further comparison with selected European countries. The study also suggests several possible assumptions for the development of the bioeconomy in the studied countries, based on their different levels of technological development and industrialization.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124000431/pdfft?md5=73b852f2b3117ee6e95e3b99147262e2&pid=1-s2.0-S1389934124000431-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124000431","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to analyse, evaluate, and compare the status of the bioeconomy concept in the Mekong region in three countries, namely Thailand, Vietnam, and Laos. The research questions focused on the perception of the bioeconomy concept by the governments and industries, the barriers to its development, and the prerequisites for its development in the region, and also explored whether it is reflected in the related existing official strategic documents. The study used a combined methodology that included qualitative document analysis and an online questionnaire distributed to public and private sector representatives in all three countries, analysed through Advocacy Coalition Framework theory lenses. The results showed that while the bioeconomy is acknowledged in many institutions of the South-East Asian countries and closely connected to the sustainable development and circular economy, there is a lack of a clear bioeconomy vision, resulting in the absence of dedicated bioeconomy strategies in these countries. The results indicated that the bioeconomy concept is a new emerging concept in these countries, which was perceived as the most important barrier to its development. Unfortunately, there is limited expert knowledge of the bioeconomy, and insufficient support from the state-level, followed by low technological development. The study also highlighted the irreplaceable role of the forest-based sector in the bioeconomy concept. The authors suggest further research on the economic valuation of the bioeconomy to promote its adoption, as well as a greater involvement of key policymakers in the individual countries for its further development, specifically in Thailand and Vietnam, or a further comparison with selected European countries. The study also suggests several possible assumptions for the development of the bioeconomy in the studied countries, based on their different levels of technological development and industrialization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
湄公河地区国家的生物经济:泰国、越南和老挝利益相关者的理解和看法
本研究旨在分析、评估和比较湄公河地区三个国家(泰国、越南和老挝)的生物经济概念现状。研究问题主要集中在政府和行业对生物经济概念的认识、生物经济发展的障碍、生物经济在该地区发展的先决条件等方面,同时还探讨了生物经济概念是否反映在现有的相关官方战略文件中。研究采用了一种综合方法,包括定性文件分析和向所有三个国家的公共和私营部门代表发放在线调查问卷,并通过宣传联盟框架理论进行分析。研究结果表明,虽然东南亚国家的许多机构都承认生物经济,并将其与可持续发展和循环经济紧密联系在一起,但这些国家缺乏明确的生物经济愿景,因此没有专门的生物经济战略。研究结果表明,生物经济概念在这些国家还是一个新兴概念,这被认为是生物经济发展的最大障碍。遗憾的是,生物经济方面的专家知识有限,国家层面的支持不足,其次是技术发展水平较低。研究还强调了以森林为基础的部门在生物经济概念中不可替代的作用。作者建议进一步研究生物经济的经济价值,以促进生物经济的采用,并让各个国家的主要决策者更多地参与生物经济的进一步发展,特别是在泰国和越南,或进一步与选定的欧洲国家进行比较。本研究还根据所研究国家不同的技术发展和工业化水平,为生物经济在这些国家的发展提出了几种可能的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Policy and Economics
Forest Policy and Economics 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
148
审稿时长
21.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.
期刊最新文献
Actors, discourses and relations in the Finnish newspapers' forest discussion: Enabling or constraining the sustainability transition? Leveraging the value chain-landscape governance nexus for non-wood forest products and tropical forest restoration Forest fire causes and prevention strategies in Portugal: Insights from stakeholder focus groups Trends in forest livelihoods research – Taking stock in 2024 The legally binding agreement on forests in Europe – Analyzing the unsuccessful attempts at regional regime creation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1