Mapping creative territories with actors, partnerships, innovations, and regulatory mechanisms based on literature review

IF 3.7 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Cleaner and Responsible Consumption Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clrc.2024.100186
Ivan Bozhikin , Janaina Macke , Daniel Miri
{"title":"Mapping creative territories with actors, partnerships, innovations, and regulatory mechanisms based on literature review","authors":"Ivan Bozhikin ,&nbsp;Janaina Macke ,&nbsp;Daniel Miri","doi":"10.1016/j.clrc.2024.100186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Creative territories are geographic spaces of collaboration between different social actors, driving innovations and requiring regulatory mechanisms for sustainability and growth. This paper aims to synthesize available evidence on creative territories through a systematic literature review to analyze the significant actors in creative territories, the type of partnerships between them, the kind of innovations in creative territories, and the regulatory mechanisms for supporting these territories. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to ensure a transparent and systematic approach. A comprehensive search in the Scopus database, employing predefined search terms and inclusion criteria, included 86 articles. The findings revealed several key topics within the existing academic literature on creative territories, including i) the individual social players in creative territories and partnerships and collaborations among them, ii) the various innovations in these territories and sectors, iii) the regulatory mechanisms applied by government and non-government actors. These topics or aspects were further analyzed and categorized to provide a comprehensive overview of the research landscape. The discussion section presents a critical analysis and synthesis of the findings, highlighting that the government supports creative territories through 16 regulatory mechanisms, while the literature highlights at least 5 levels of government intervention. Additionally, private social actors can positively impact creative territories through various regulatory mechanisms, including firm self-regulation, industry self-regulation, and civil regulation, with at least 21 social actors classified into 5 groups collaborating through six types/forms of collaboration. Furthermore, several circumstances and factors should be available to prosper in a particular partnership/collaboration like a clear definition of responsibilities, well-defined rules, mutual benefits, equal collaboration, and solid authority. The findings underscore the importance of creative territories and serve as a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers, offering insights and directions for future research endeavors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34617,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner and Responsible Consumption","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100186"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666784324000196/pdfft?md5=f4e49323ac1faa76249082e5411b6ed8&pid=1-s2.0-S2666784324000196-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner and Responsible Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666784324000196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Creative territories are geographic spaces of collaboration between different social actors, driving innovations and requiring regulatory mechanisms for sustainability and growth. This paper aims to synthesize available evidence on creative territories through a systematic literature review to analyze the significant actors in creative territories, the type of partnerships between them, the kind of innovations in creative territories, and the regulatory mechanisms for supporting these territories. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to ensure a transparent and systematic approach. A comprehensive search in the Scopus database, employing predefined search terms and inclusion criteria, included 86 articles. The findings revealed several key topics within the existing academic literature on creative territories, including i) the individual social players in creative territories and partnerships and collaborations among them, ii) the various innovations in these territories and sectors, iii) the regulatory mechanisms applied by government and non-government actors. These topics or aspects were further analyzed and categorized to provide a comprehensive overview of the research landscape. The discussion section presents a critical analysis and synthesis of the findings, highlighting that the government supports creative territories through 16 regulatory mechanisms, while the literature highlights at least 5 levels of government intervention. Additionally, private social actors can positively impact creative territories through various regulatory mechanisms, including firm self-regulation, industry self-regulation, and civil regulation, with at least 21 social actors classified into 5 groups collaborating through six types/forms of collaboration. Furthermore, several circumstances and factors should be available to prosper in a particular partnership/collaboration like a clear definition of responsibilities, well-defined rules, mutual benefits, equal collaboration, and solid authority. The findings underscore the importance of creative territories and serve as a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers, offering insights and directions for future research endeavors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在文献审查的基础上,绘制具有参与者、伙伴关系、创新和监管机制的创意领地图
创意地域是不同社会行动者之间合作的地理空间,它推动创新,需要监管机制来实现可持续性和增长。本文旨在通过系统性文献综述,综合有关创意地域的现有证据,分析创意地域的重要参与者、他们之间的合作类型、创意地域的创新类型以及支持这些地域的监管机制。研究遵循了系统综述和元分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,以确保研究方法的透明性和系统性。在 Scopus 数据库中进行了全面搜索,采用了预先确定的搜索条件和纳入标准,共纳入了 86 篇文章。研究结果揭示了现有创意领地学术文献中的几个关键主题,包括 i) 创意领地中的各个社会参与者以及他们之间的伙伴关系和合作;ii) 这些领地和部门中的各种创新;iii) 政府和非政府参与者采用的监管机制。对这些主题或方面进行了进一步的分析和分类,以提供对研究情况的全面概述。讨论部分对研究结果进行了批判性分析和综合,强调政府通过 16 种监管机制支持创意领域,而文献则强调了至少 5 个层面的政府干预。此外,私人社会行动者也可以通过各种监管机制对创意领地产生积极影响,包括企业自律、行业自律和民间监管,至少有 21 个社会行动者分为 5 个群体,通过 6 种类型/形式的合作开展协作。此外,要在特定的伙伴关系/合作中取得成功,还需要具备一些条件和因素,如明确的责任界定、清晰的规则、互惠互利、平等合作和稳固的权威。研究结果强调了创造性领域的重要性,为研究人员、从业人员和政策制定者提供了宝贵的资源,为今后的研究工作提供了见解和方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cleaner and Responsible Consumption
Cleaner and Responsible Consumption Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
99 days
期刊最新文献
Emerging concerns in sustainability reporting: Disclosure of tertiary effects in the home appliance industry Green public procurement in construction: A systematic review Bridging gaps in the demand and supply for circular economy: Empirical insights into the symbiotic roles of consumers and manufacturing companies Tackling fashion waste from inside the wardrobe: The influence of personal factors on sustainable clothing use practice How to promote mobile phone recovery? Evaluation of a collection campaign in Belgian schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1