Differences Between Farmers and Crop Protection Service Providers in the Use of Pesticides

IF 2.4 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Gesunde Pflanzen Pub Date : 2024-03-12 DOI:10.1007/s10343-024-00978-w
Andreas Heinzl, Roman Braun, Hubert Köppl, Siegfried Pöchtrager, Siegrid Steinkellner
{"title":"Differences Between Farmers and Crop Protection Service Providers in the Use of Pesticides","authors":"Andreas Heinzl, Roman Braun, Hubert Köppl, Siegfried Pöchtrager, Siegrid Steinkellner","doi":"10.1007/s10343-024-00978-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>EU-wide statistics on the use of pesticides in agriculture are available on the quantities placed on the market, but data on actual use in practice are limited. In this study, comparative data on pesticide use and resistance management were collected for a region with mixed agriculture (arable and animal husbandry) in Austria. Based on individual pesticide records of 30 farmers and 10 service providers who perform plant protection tasks for 30 farms, the average application rates of pesticides, the change of the active substance group as well as the shortfalls and exceedances of the maximum permissible application rate were compared. Most farmers and service providers usually make a well-considered change in the group of active substances to avoid the development of resistance. Exceedances and underdosing of authorised application rates were found for both groups of people, with farmers tending to deviate more often. The applications amounts were largely in compliance with the law, however, in 3.69% of the 2387 evaluated uses of pesticides, the authorised application rate was exceeded. This excess was found somewhat more frequently among farmers than service providers. The application rate excesses can be attributed to technical overruns due to differences between actually farmed and formally declared area, confusion caused by complex application instructions but also by intention. To avoid inadequate information on authorised application rates and to simplify information gathering, the development of databases and apps that take into account not only the indisputably essential aspect of correct registration, but especially the user and user-friendliness, would be of great benefit and value. Packaging sizes adapted to different requirements and farm sizes would also be advantageous. High priority should be given to the technical training of users and sales personnel. This can contribute to higher professionalism in the use of pesticides in terms of compliance and resistance management, but also to the reduction of pesticides.</p>","PeriodicalId":12580,"journal":{"name":"Gesunde Pflanzen","volume":"363 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesunde Pflanzen","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-024-00978-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

EU-wide statistics on the use of pesticides in agriculture are available on the quantities placed on the market, but data on actual use in practice are limited. In this study, comparative data on pesticide use and resistance management were collected for a region with mixed agriculture (arable and animal husbandry) in Austria. Based on individual pesticide records of 30 farmers and 10 service providers who perform plant protection tasks for 30 farms, the average application rates of pesticides, the change of the active substance group as well as the shortfalls and exceedances of the maximum permissible application rate were compared. Most farmers and service providers usually make a well-considered change in the group of active substances to avoid the development of resistance. Exceedances and underdosing of authorised application rates were found for both groups of people, with farmers tending to deviate more often. The applications amounts were largely in compliance with the law, however, in 3.69% of the 2387 evaluated uses of pesticides, the authorised application rate was exceeded. This excess was found somewhat more frequently among farmers than service providers. The application rate excesses can be attributed to technical overruns due to differences between actually farmed and formally declared area, confusion caused by complex application instructions but also by intention. To avoid inadequate information on authorised application rates and to simplify information gathering, the development of databases and apps that take into account not only the indisputably essential aspect of correct registration, but especially the user and user-friendliness, would be of great benefit and value. Packaging sizes adapted to different requirements and farm sizes would also be advantageous. High priority should be given to the technical training of users and sales personnel. This can contribute to higher professionalism in the use of pesticides in terms of compliance and resistance management, but also to the reduction of pesticides.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农民与作物保护服务提供商在使用农药方面的差异
欧盟范围内关于农药在农业中使用的统计数字是关于投放市场的数量,但关于实际使用的数据却很有限。本研究收集了奥地利一个混合农业(耕地和畜牧业)地区的农药使用和抗性管理比较数据。根据为 30 个农场提供植保服务的 30 位农民和 10 位服务提供商的个人农药使用记录,比较了农药的平均施用量、活性物质群的变化以及最大允许施用量的不足和超标情况。大多数农民和服务提供商通常会经过深思熟虑后更改活性物质组别,以避免产生抗药性。两类人都发现了超过和低于允许施用量的情况,其中农民往往偏离得更多。施用量基本符合法律规定,但在 2387 次农药使用评估中,有 3.69% 的施用量超过了授权施用量。与服务提供商相比,农民使用量超标的情况更多一些。施用量超标可归因于实际耕种面积与正式申报面积之间的差异造成的技术超标、复杂的施用说明造成的混淆,也可归因于有意为之。为避免授权施用量信息不足并简化信息收集,开发数据库和应用程序不仅要考虑到正确登记这一无可争议的基本方面,还要特别考虑到用户和用户友好性,这将大有裨益和价值。适应不同要求和农场规模的包装规格也将大有裨益。应高度重视对用户和销售人员的技术培训。这不仅有助于提高农药使用的专业性,使其符合要求和管理抗药性,还有助于减少农药的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gesunde Pflanzen
Gesunde Pflanzen 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
25.80%
发文量
152
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gesunde Pflanzen publiziert praxisbezogene Beiträge zum Pflanzenschutz in Landwirtschaft, Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau und öffentlichem Grün und seinen Bezügen zum Umwelt- und Verbraucherschutz sowie zu Rechtsfragen. Das Themenspektrum reicht von der Bestimmung der Schadorganismen über Maßnahmen und Verfahren zur Minderung des Befallsrisikos bis hin zur Entwicklung und Anwendung nicht-chemischer und chemischer Bekämpfungsstrategien und -verfahren, aber auch zu Fragen der Auswirkungen des Pflanzenschutzes auf die Umwelt, die Sicherung der Ernährung sowie zu allgemeinen Fragen wie Nutzen und Risiken und zur Entwicklung neuer Technologien. Jedes Heft enthält Originalbeiträge renommierter Wissenschaftler, aktuelle Informationen von Verbänden sowie aus der Industrie, Pressemitteilungen und Personalia. Damit bietet die Zeitschrift vor allem Behörden und Anwendern im Agrarsektor und Verbraucherschutz fundierte Praxisunterstützung auf wissenschaftlichem Niveau.
期刊最新文献
Nematicidal Potential of Enzymatic Extracts of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacillus cereus on Different Stages of Potato Cyst Nematode Globodera pallida A Critical Insight into the Breeding for Resistance to Bacterial Diseases in Pepper (Capsicum spp.) Genome-wide Analysis of Developmental Stage-specific Transcriptome in Spodoptera litura for the Identification of Effective Control Method Response of Cigar Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) Varieties to Low Potassium Stress and Dissecting Biochemical Determinants of Low Potassium Tolerance Mechanism Comparative Analysis of Alfalfa Mutants in Response to Drought Stress Applied After First Cutting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1