Enhancing pneumococcal bacteraemia diagnosis: A comparative assessment of culture-independent assays (MALDI–TOF–MS Sepsityper® module and a lateral flow inmunochromatography test)

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eimc.2024.02.001
{"title":"Enhancing pneumococcal bacteraemia diagnosis: A comparative assessment of culture-independent assays (MALDI–TOF–MS Sepsityper® module and a lateral flow inmunochromatography test)","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.eimc.2024.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Pneumococcal bacteraemia is a major contributor to global morbidity and mortality. Traditional culture-based methods lack sensitivity and are time-consuming. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of two culture-independent assays, the MALDI–TOF–MS Sepsityper® module and the lateral flow inmunochromatography test (LFICT) with the Standard F® <em>Streptococcus pneumoniae</em>, directly from positive blood culture (BC) bottles.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective study was conducted from December 2021 to July 2022. For all BC positives for <span><span>S. pneumoniae</span></span> a double centrifugation protocol was implemented. The resulting pellet was subsequently processed using both techniques.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The LFICT showed exceptional performance with 100% sensitivity and specificity, outperforming the MALDI–TOF–MS Sepsityper® module, which achieved 85.2% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Nevertheless, the combination of these assays offers a robust and comprehensive approach to diagnosis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The simultaneous use of both techniques offers a promising alternative that can be integrated into routine practices directly from BC samples.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11608,"journal":{"name":"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica","volume":"42 7","pages":"Pages 377-379"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213005X24002040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Pneumococcal bacteraemia is a major contributor to global morbidity and mortality. Traditional culture-based methods lack sensitivity and are time-consuming. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of two culture-independent assays, the MALDI–TOF–MS Sepsityper® module and the lateral flow inmunochromatography test (LFICT) with the Standard F® Streptococcus pneumoniae, directly from positive blood culture (BC) bottles.

Methods

A prospective study was conducted from December 2021 to July 2022. For all BC positives for S. pneumoniae a double centrifugation protocol was implemented. The resulting pellet was subsequently processed using both techniques.

Results

The LFICT showed exceptional performance with 100% sensitivity and specificity, outperforming the MALDI–TOF–MS Sepsityper® module, which achieved 85.2% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Nevertheless, the combination of these assays offers a robust and comprehensive approach to diagnosis.

Conclusions

The simultaneous use of both techniques offers a promising alternative that can be integrated into routine practices directly from BC samples.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加强肺炎球菌菌血症诊断:独立于培养的检测方法(MALDI-TOF-MS Sepsityper® 模块和侧流免疫层析检测)的比较评估
肺炎球菌菌血症是导致全球发病率和死亡率的一个主要因素。传统的培养法缺乏灵敏度且耗时。本研究旨在评估两种独立于培养的检测方法的有效性,即直接从阳性血培养物(BC)瓶中检测MALDI-TOF-MS Sepsityper®模块和使用标准F®的侧流免疫层析检测(LFICT)。2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 7 月期间进行了一项前瞻性研究。对所有 BC 阳性样本都采用了双重离心方案。随后使用这两种技术对得到的颗粒进行处理。LFICT 显示出卓越的性能,灵敏度和特异性均达到 100%,优于 MALDI-TOF-MS Sepsityper® 模块,后者的灵敏度为 85.2%,特异性为 100%。尽管如此,将这些检测方法结合起来可提供一种可靠而全面的诊断方法。同时使用这两种技术提供了一种很有前景的替代方法,可以直接从 BC 样品中整合到常规实践中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
8.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Hoy está universalmente reconocida la renovada y creciente importancia de la patología infecciosa: aparición de nuevos agentes patógenos, de cepas resistentes, de procesos con expresión clínica hasta ahora desconocida, de cuadros de una gran complejidad. Paralelamente, la Microbiología y la Infectología Clínicas han experimentado un gran desarrollo como respuesta al reto planteado por la actual patología infecciosa. Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española SEIMC. Cumple con la garantía científica de esta Sociedad, la doble función de difundir trabajos de investigación, tanto clínicos como microbiológicos, referidos a la patología infecciosa, y contribuye a la formación continuada de los interesados en aquella patología mediante artículos orientados a ese fin y elaborados por autores de la mayor calificación invitados por la revista.
期刊最新文献
Resultados de la encuesta nacional de REIV-TOXO sobre el cribado gestacional de la toxoplasmosis en España Knowledge, attitudes and practices in HIV-related chronic inflammation and cardiovascular risk in Spain Utilidad predictiva de mortalidad de las escalas qSOFA, NEWS y GYM en el paciente anciano con infección en urgencias: estudio EDEN-5 Análisis de los motivos de solicitud de serología del virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH) en urgencias diferentes a los definidos en la estrategia de detección dirigida del programa «Urgències VIHgila» y su potencial inclusión en un futuro documento de consenso Are these lesions contagious?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1