Impacts of on-farm water sanitation practices on microbial hygiene in poultry waterlines and efficacy of sodium hypochlorite-based product on foodborne pathogens
{"title":"Impacts of on-farm water sanitation practices on microbial hygiene in poultry waterlines and efficacy of sodium hypochlorite-based product on foodborne pathogens","authors":"Rabin Raut , Agnes Kilonzo-Nthenge , Tobenna Aniume , Ashesh Basnet , Susan Watkins , Pramir Maharjan","doi":"10.1016/j.japr.2024.100425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The microbial water quality of poultry water supplies can be correlated to bird health, livability, overall performance, and human food safety. On-farm microbial evaluations were conducted to understand microbial hygiene of poultry waterlines based on water sanitation practices. With on-farm study I, 2 farms were selected: Farm A and Farm B; that did not practice water sanitation consistently during the flock grow-out period. Prevalence tests for specific pathogens- <em>Salmonella, E coli, Campylobacter, Listeria,</em> and <em>Staphylococcus</em> were performed for both farms by collecting swab samples post bird harvest from waterlines and plating in specific growth media. With the on-farm study II, 1 broiler farm with 4 barn units that treated water (Chlorine [<strong>Cl</strong>]= ∼ 1 ppm) during the flock grow-out period and flushed waterlines between flocks using concentrated chlorine solution (>1,000 ppm) was selected. Swab samples (1 from each barn, n = 4; each sampling occasion) were collected on 3 occasions-before flushing, after flushing, and at the end of the grow-out period (d 42) to understand biofilm growth nature in poultry waterlines. Additionally, a separate in-vitro study was conducted to understand the efficacy of a commonly used poultry drinking water sanitizer product (sodium hypochlorite, 8.25%) against specific foodborne pathogens<em>: Salmonella</em> Enteritidis (<strong>SE</strong>), <em>E. coli</em> and <em>Listeria</em>. Results from the on-farm study I showed that Farm A and Farm B were positive for <em>Listeria</em> and <em>Staphylococcus,</em> whereas these farms were found negative for other species tested. The findings from on-farm study II showed that biofilm reestablished (>4 log<sub>10</sub> cfu/mL) in waterlines by the end of grow-out cycle despite waterline cleaning and consistent water sanitation during flock grow-out period. The in-vitro test showed that the efficacy of chlorine-based water sanitizer at the field application dose rates was affected by pathogen load in water and pathogen types. The overall results from on-farm or in-vitro studies indicated that poultry growers need to emphasize consistent and robust poultry drinking water sanitation practice in their farms to keep the acceptable bacterial levels in poultry water supplies or water systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Poultry Research","volume":"33 3","pages":"Article 100425"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056617124000242/pdfft?md5=34b46e4c9d312dddcfd4ff4e1d30be70&pid=1-s2.0-S1056617124000242-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Poultry Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056617124000242","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The microbial water quality of poultry water supplies can be correlated to bird health, livability, overall performance, and human food safety. On-farm microbial evaluations were conducted to understand microbial hygiene of poultry waterlines based on water sanitation practices. With on-farm study I, 2 farms were selected: Farm A and Farm B; that did not practice water sanitation consistently during the flock grow-out period. Prevalence tests for specific pathogens- Salmonella, E coli, Campylobacter, Listeria, and Staphylococcus were performed for both farms by collecting swab samples post bird harvest from waterlines and plating in specific growth media. With the on-farm study II, 1 broiler farm with 4 barn units that treated water (Chlorine [Cl]= ∼ 1 ppm) during the flock grow-out period and flushed waterlines between flocks using concentrated chlorine solution (>1,000 ppm) was selected. Swab samples (1 from each barn, n = 4; each sampling occasion) were collected on 3 occasions-before flushing, after flushing, and at the end of the grow-out period (d 42) to understand biofilm growth nature in poultry waterlines. Additionally, a separate in-vitro study was conducted to understand the efficacy of a commonly used poultry drinking water sanitizer product (sodium hypochlorite, 8.25%) against specific foodborne pathogens: Salmonella Enteritidis (SE), E. coli and Listeria. Results from the on-farm study I showed that Farm A and Farm B were positive for Listeria and Staphylococcus, whereas these farms were found negative for other species tested. The findings from on-farm study II showed that biofilm reestablished (>4 log10 cfu/mL) in waterlines by the end of grow-out cycle despite waterline cleaning and consistent water sanitation during flock grow-out period. The in-vitro test showed that the efficacy of chlorine-based water sanitizer at the field application dose rates was affected by pathogen load in water and pathogen types. The overall results from on-farm or in-vitro studies indicated that poultry growers need to emphasize consistent and robust poultry drinking water sanitation practice in their farms to keep the acceptable bacterial levels in poultry water supplies or water systems.
家禽供水的微生物水质与家禽的健康、宜居性、整体性能和人类食品安全息息相关。为了解家禽水线的微生物卫生状况,我们根据水卫生实践进行了农场微生物评估。农场研究 I 选择了两个农场:养殖场 A 和养殖场 B 在鸡群生长期间没有持续进行水卫生处理。两个养殖场都在禽类收获后从水线上采集拭子样本,并在特定生长培养基中进行培养,从而对特定病原体进行流行测试。在农场研究 II 中,选择了一家拥有四个鸡舍单元的肉鸡场,该鸡场在鸡群生长期对水进行处理(氯 (Cl)= ∼ 1 ppm),并在鸡群之间使用浓氯溶液(>1000 ppm)冲洗水线。在冲洗前、冲洗后和生长期结束时(第 42 天)三次采集拭子样本(每个禽舍一个,n=4;每次采样),以了解家禽水线中生物膜的生长性质。此外,还进行了一项单独的研究,以了解常用的家禽饮用水消毒剂产品(次氯酸钠,8.25%)对特定食源性病原体肠炎球菌(SE)和......的功效。农场研究 I 的结果表明,A 农场和 B 农场的肠道病毒和其他病原体呈阳性反应,而这两个农场的其他病原体呈阴性反应。养殖场研究 II 的结果表明,尽管在鸡群生长期间进行了水线清洁和持续的水质卫生,但在生长周期结束时,生物膜在水线中重新形成(> 4 log cfu/ml)。测试表明,氯基水消毒剂在田间施用剂量率下的功效受水中病原体负荷和病原体类型的影响。农场试验的总体结果表明,家禽饲养者需要在其农场中强调持续和有力的家禽饮用水卫生措施,以保持家禽供水或供水系统中可接受的细菌水平。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Applied Poultry Research (JAPR) publishes original research reports, field reports, and reviews on breeding, hatching, health and disease, layer management, meat bird processing and products, meat bird management, microbiology, food safety, nutrition, environment, sanitation, welfare, and economics. As of January 2020, JAPR will become an Open Access journal with no subscription charges, meaning authors who publish here can make their research immediately, permanently, and freely accessible worldwide while retaining copyright to their work. Papers submitted for publication after October 1, 2019 will be published as Open Access papers.
The readers of JAPR are in education, extension, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, veterinary medicine, management, production, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Nutritionists, breeder flock supervisors, production managers, microbiologists, laboratory personnel, food safety and sanitation managers, poultry processing managers, feed manufacturers, and egg producers use JAPR to keep up with current applied poultry research.